DanJR1
7 Apr 2003, 15:25
what do you think is quicker around a general racetrack? The McLaren F1 or the Dax rush Turbo Hayabusa. The F1 manages about 500bhp/per ton but the Dax has about 770bhp/per ton.wot u lot think?
|
|||
|
|
|||
whats quicker?DanJR1 7 Apr 2003, 15:25 what do you think is quicker around a general racetrack? The McLaren F1 or the Dax rush Turbo Hayabusa. The F1 manages about 500bhp/per ton but the Dax has about 770bhp/per ton.wot u lot think? paul-collins 7 Apr 2003, 15:47 The Dax doesn't look like it has much in the way of aero. That said, its handling and launch should make up for the top-end penalty. What would its top end be? Dan Friel 7 Apr 2003, 21:37 Too many variables! But if we were talkign 'average' everything.. (conditions, track, driver etc) The Mclaren gfm 7 Apr 2003, 21:47 McLaren was 1150 kg (wet) and 627 bhp. Are we talking road-going trim or what? Hobson 9 Apr 2003, 10:07 Which track? To make a guess with whats on offer here, I'd say the Dax. avsfan733 10 Apr 2003, 06:02 well you could always use the mclaren to make sure you win |
| ||
|
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antill. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2006 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved. Visit our news site www.parcferme.com ![]() |
|||
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum