webers or throttle bodies soundwise?

graham bahr
30 Jun 2005, 12:52
i've been an injection and throttle body convert for years now, but having just aquired a mk2 RS2000, i felt it would be a waste not to fit my old 45 dcoe's that used to be on the beemer, the carbs may not have the really sharp bark and throttle responce or even generally nice manors of throttle bodies, but in the sound department they win the battle hands down, what do you all think?

Kev_205
30 Jun 2005, 13:01
carbs definetly sound meatier on idle and low revs, but I'd never trade in my throttle bodies

graham bahr
30 Jun 2005, 13:09
carbs definetly sound meatier on idle and low revs, but I'd never trade in my throttle bodies

niether would i, but i now find myself driving the RS just to listen to the carbs, sad or what?

that said, if i had a spare set of bodies and ecu i'd fit them instead

R59
30 Jun 2005, 21:10
Also depends on the bellmouths - like a tuned musical instrument.

Al Weyman
30 Jun 2005, 21:58
Or a shrieking Banshee, this always griped me when I used to get comments from the sound scrutineer about the chevy being 'marginal' but when on the track compared to cars on throttle bodies it was a quiet pussycat.

thatorangething
5 Jul 2005, 00:16
Hi Graham; two things come to mind; Lotus Sunbeam gargling on on 48 Dellortos. Oh yes...
Or,maybe a 289 Ford powered Griffith, trying to suck wildlife down it's Holley. Carbs it is!
No further questions M'lud! :rotate:

andypipe
29 Jul 2005, 16:00
Graham, carry on with the RS and you may stay out of the gravel :innocent: :evillaff:




Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antill. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2006 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Visit our news site www.parcferme.com
One of the largest message boards on the web !

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum