View Single Post
Old 25 Apr 2012, 18:20 (Ref:3065509)   #747
MulsanneMike
Veteran
 
MulsanneMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
United States
Posts: 1,831
MulsanneMike has a real shot at the podium!MulsanneMike has a real shot at the podium!MulsanneMike has a real shot at the podium!MulsanneMike has a real shot at the podium!
Quote:
Originally Posted by alexkiller8 View Post
when has been said that they will use the same rear end? the will use the same rear end of the same tub but the rear section of the bodykit where is anchored the base of the rear wing is just a bodykit part that can be attached/detached to the rear area of the chassis/tub, is not an integral part of nothing. To explain better, see these 2 holes in the pic where in my opinion will be anchored the 2 supports of the swan neck. If they really used the AMR-one configuration simply there wasn't any exigence to do these suspect holes. Simple no?
Disagree: holes appear to be small latch buckets. The optimum aero is for a single mount. And if the AMR-One already has provisions for such there's no point in double mounts.
MulsanneMike is offline  
Quote