Quote:
Originally Posted by ACFlinn
Wouldn't it be actually just the opposite with even MORE teams contesting the four NAEC-only endurance rounds?
Wouldn't these races be just as important if not more important - and more exciting - than the other Tudor USCC races next year?
Andy Flinn
|
The way everything is going, it's looking like it's going to be that way.alll everybody seems to care about is the enduros.every thing is " select rounds next year" and we all know what they are talking about.almost every one here seems to care more about damn p2 s and gte's from Europe just to see them run 4 races just to run back to Europe like they have done before.the way it is those 4 races will be the impart ant and exciting races next year, they haven't even mentioned the normal rounds race durations, all the have mentioned is a mess of a schedule with races only having to classes or splitting the classes into two races.as a fan I would feel ripped off not watching all four at the same time and hard to stay interested.the naec is a poor gimmick grand am came up and realy didn't turn into much,grand am was good even with out it all it gained for it was some more grid spots that were "also rans" anyways.i just want to see more full season efforts not select rounds announcements blowing smoke looking for funding.