Thread: USCC (leave your axe outside)
View Single Post
Old 23 Apr 2014, 22:28 (Ref:3397484)   #6739
TRspitfirefan
Veteran
 
TRspitfirefan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
United States
Posts: 1,250
TRspitfirefan should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridTRspitfirefan should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridTRspitfirefan should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridTRspitfirefan should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by TRspitfirefan View Post
http://www.racer.com/imsa/item/10296...totype-chassis
This news is gutting.
A common spec chassis, with brand specific "decorations" and different engines.

The 2017 P2 car will be dreadful! What are they thinking?
Some clarification of the proposed 2017 P2 spec from Scot Elkins on Twitter.
https://twitter.com/scotelkins?origi...45399238119424
It may not be as bad as it first sounded.
Quote:
Scot Elkins ‏@scotelkins All, pls realize that for the 2017 car, spec is specification-not single make-all p1 tubs are same specification-exactly the same idea
Quote:
Scot Elkins ‏@scotelkins Actually the idea is to use the p1 specification for the tub of the new car-latest safety spec And room for taller drivers
Quote:
Scot Elkins ‏@scotelkins Actually the idea is to use the p1 specification for the tub of the new car-latest safety spec And room for taller drivers
It is really helpful that some are taking the time to interact with fans.
TRspitfirefan is offline