Thread: Driver Parity: To Be Or Not To Be?
View Single Post
Old 1 Nov 2007, 10:56 (Ref:2056731)   #20
crmalcolm
Subscriber
Veteran
 
crmalcolm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Nepal
Exactly where I need to be.
Posts: 12,377
crmalcolm will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famecrmalcolm will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famecrmalcolm will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famecrmalcolm will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famecrmalcolm will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famecrmalcolm will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famecrmalcolm will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famecrmalcolm will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famecrmalcolm will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famecrmalcolm will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famecrmalcolm will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Fame
Quote:
Originally Posted by NickoGP
Remove the concept of the constructor's championship, rejig the way prize money is awarded so that it is based on driver position, and then there will be no need for team orders unless it comes down to a driver's championship win. It's in their interest to have the two drivers as far up the list as possible and who wins doesn't matter as long as one of them gets the driver's title.
Would depend on how the money is structured. Would a 2nd and 12th be more beneficial than 5th and 6th. If the former, then teams would definitely favour 1 driver with the 2nd purely as a support.
crmalcolm is offline  
Quote