View Single Post
Old 11 Apr 2024, 08:25 (Ref:4204581)   #242
V8 Fireworks
Veteran
 
V8 Fireworks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,950
V8 Fireworks should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridV8 Fireworks should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridV8 Fireworks should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taxi645 View Post
One of the reasons why the side wall is now higher than originally planned for the 18'' wheels was because the feedback from F1 teams was that the low side wall was going to have a too much of a negative effect on the suspension performance.
But that's because F1 cars have piddly torsion bar springs and not proper springs. We don't have such issues on WRC cars with their 500mm of coil sprung strut suspension travel, even on 18"tarmac tyres.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Taxi645 View Post
This link I shared earlier in the thread from James Allison in 2020 on his view to the move of lower side walls on a F1 car.
https://www.racefans.net/2020/06/04/...lower-allison/
1969 March 15" front tyre:


Looks low profile to me...

So it should be Allison on the return to low profile tyres, no?

13" was only ever due to the rules. Who says F1 tyre suppliers would not have gone to increasing larger diameter wheels & lower profile tyres than 15" of the late 1960's, if they had been allowed to?

Yes, the constructors used the balloonish 13"tyres as an opportunity to design more compact suspension systems with minimal travel, but who says that was inevitable if tyre development had run its course? That didn't happen in sportscar prototype racing after all -- they went to larger and larger wheels up to 18", while using comparatively long travel suspension systems.

Last edited by V8 Fireworks; 11 Apr 2024 at 08:36.
V8 Fireworks is offline  
Quote