View Single Post
Old 22 Jul 2010, 09:50 (Ref:2730531)   #139
gwyllion
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Belgium
Posts: 8,738
gwyllion is going for a new world record!gwyllion is going for a new world record!gwyllion is going for a new world record!gwyllion is going for a new world record!gwyllion is going for a new world record!gwyllion is going for a new world record!gwyllion is going for a new world record!
Quote:
Originally Posted by hcl123 View Post
sorry to reply out of order,but... ACO thinks so... 9 liter less for diesels tanks is justified by saying that diesel has 10% higher BTU for the same fuel volume.
Just compare the density of the 2 racing fuels provided by Shell: 834 kg/m3 for diesel (see here) vs 754 kg/m3 for petrol (see here).That is a difference of 10%. Could this be a coincidence?
Quote:
Originally Posted by hcl123 View Post
which is a lie of course... unless diesels where running JP8 kind of aircraft fuel which is very doubtful for a lot of reasons...
As far as I can tell the only advantage of JP-8 fuel is that it works better in low temperature conditions (does not gel). It has a lower cetane number than regular diesel and hence a longer ignition delay. In fact, the Shell race diesel is a blend of petroleum based diesel and synthetic GTL in order to have a higher cetane number (59.4) than regular diesel.
Quote:
Originally Posted by hcl123 View Post
Ok here goes my stance for the R18

Spider open concept
Audi has found out from racing the Peugeot 908 that closed car have an aero advantage. Next year, with the reduced power this will be even more important. See http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/84533
Quote:
Originally Posted by hcl123 View Post
4 wheel drive with 4 small electric motor/generators in each wheel hub, perhaps in the range of 20 HP each, not more...
I think a setup like the hybrid Toyota Supra is more sensible: 2 small in-wheel electric motors at the front and at the rear 1 bigger electric motor integrated in the gearbox (like Zytek solution/F1 KERS). In-wheel motors at the rear will be messy because the driveshafts are also going to the wheels.
Quote:
Originally Posted by hcl123 View Post
A Litium ion battery pack that will allow to store the max amount of energy, in electric form as permitted by the rules.
It is not clear whether a chemical battery is the best solution. Toyota used supercapacitors and Porsche a flywheel battery. You need to do a lot of charge/discharge cycles during 24 hours.
Quote:
Originally Posted by hcl123 View Post
Main engine a 3.7 Liter V8 biturbo diesel with double head camshaft and 4 valves cylinder
Rumors suggest Audi will go for a V6 configuration. See http://www.racecar-engineering.com/n...prototype.html
Quote:
Originally Posted by hcl123 View Post
It would be a clever trick!... the rules have holes and blanks... but 2 of the electric hub motors can be made to run constantly from cruising to acceleration, perhaps the front wheel motors with power generated and delivered directly from the other 2 wheel hub motors acting as generators on the rear axle, by-passing that way the batteries.
Why would you want to drive the front wheels "constantly"? Isn't it better to do this on demand i.e. when the rear wheels lose grip?
gwyllion is offline  
Quote