Thread: Rumours Active Suspension ....
View Single Post
Old 17 Apr 2014, 09:57 (Ref:3393763)   #19
Pingguest
Veteran
 
Pingguest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Netherlands
Heemstede, The Netherlands
Posts: 3,192
Pingguest should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by wnut View Post
I'd say your first concern is justified!

Active suspension will be eye wateringly expensive!
Endless fettling and infinite improvement!

Computer controls, valves, sensors, software, processing speeds, tuning, infinite adjustability!
The cost of developing an active suspension system is probably minimal compared to the expenses of the current passive and interconnected suspensions, that require of development, simulation and setup work before and during the race weekends as well as completely different parts developed for different tracks.
The passive front and rear suspensions have been interconnected since a couple years now. Interconnected suspensions are a true masterpiece of engineering but also very expensive, as it is quite difficult to develop a well-functioning basic system and different parts for each track with specific properties are necessary. An active suspension would most likely allow teams to develop just one suspension system for the entire year, as changes needed to cope with different tracks properties throughout the season - if any - can be implemented by simply uploading new software.
Pingguest is offline  
__________________
'Aerodynamics are for people who can't build engines.' - Enzo Ferrari
Quote