Quote:
Originally Posted by Al Weyman
Not sure about this one as it seems like a rust worms charter. Maybe an annual structual condition only would have made more sense IMHO.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Mallett
If you consider that a major portion of these cars will have; no windscreen washers, in some cases no windscreen, cable operated drum brakes, no catalytic converter, lights on cycle pods, ash frames etc. then the MOT makes no sense anyway.
|
Surely that means that some sort of testing should still be used? Removing the need for pre-1960 vehicles to undergo an MOT would surely lead to some very dangerous vehicles being on the road - just look at some of the vehicles on the roads in America where an MOT style test is not required.