Quote:
Originally Posted by CDM
Totally agree!!
Had to laugh at Bargs saying that the race should have been red flagged earlier. Whats the point of that?? Would have only have hugely disadvantaged those that took the gamble (that paid off in this case) to start on wets. The rest should have either slowed down for the conditions or pitted during the race to change...
|
I guess it's a question of safety.
It does strike me is a little strange that for the sake of safety, if the race is declared wet you must your rain light operating. But if it starts hosing down halfway through a race and guys are on slicks, you're not required to have your rain light going and their quite happy to have everyone running around until there's carnage. I'd suggest that what was alllowed to happen in Race 2 was far far far far more dangerous than a non operational rain light.