2 Mar 2010, 03:45 (Ref:2643096)
|
#929
|
Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 46
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bjohnsonsmith
There was a problem with sponsors money but the real problem was with MasterCard wanting the car to race in 1997 not 1998 as was intended and as a result the car was never tested in the wind tunnel. You might want to read this.
http://www.f1rejects.com/teams/lola/profile.html
|
Yes, I've read it.
Quote:
The MasterCard deal was said to be 'innovative', in that it depended upon using Lola's racing activities to draw in customers to the credit card program. This was never a guaranteed success in the first place, and it meant that cash was only trickling rather than flowing into the team.
|
Quote:
Both drivers went to Brazil, only to read in the newspapers that their team had collapsed. In the space of a few short months, Lola's Grand Prix arm had built up some 6 million pounds in debt, half of which was owed to parent company Lola Cars. The risky sponsorship program with MasterCard had not helped things at all.
|
The car was awful because of the timetable shift. The team folded because it had no sponsor money.
|
|
|