|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
4 Dec 2001, 16:59 (Ref:182154) | #1 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 714
|
How come no new car changes
We've had the same car templates for 2 seasons now, how come they havn't changed?
In 1998 Ford introduced the Taurus and a remodify for 2000 also Chevy introduced the new Monte Carlo for 2000 How come there isn't any new changes for 2002? Or is it 2003 that the new bodies will be introduced? |
||
|
4 Dec 2001, 18:48 (Ref:182224) | #2 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,318
|
Don't know dude-
This is the kind of question that I usually wait for YOU to answer! |
||
|
4 Dec 2001, 18:56 (Ref:182233) | #3 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 714
|
The only reason I can think of is that they continually upgrade their racecars.
Maybe Ford introduced a 2000 model to counteract Chevy's 2000 MC. 'Ford is doing stuff to the cars that NASCAR has to yet to get its head around yet!' Robert Yates |
||
|
5 Dec 2001, 00:14 (Ref:182365) | #4 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 400
|
The reason is simple, there have been no new models to come out of Detroit. The new bodies should come out in 03 or 04. You'll see changes then, unless the new bodies are not as good as the present models.
|
||
|
5 Dec 2001, 01:26 (Ref:182376) | #5 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 714
|
How soon before the manufacturers design their road cars around their racing cars?
Then maybe everyone will be able to buy a genuine NASCAR car for the road |
||
|
5 Dec 2001, 01:44 (Ref:182380) | #6 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 400
|
Don't know how to answer that one. In the old days, it wass like that, the cars raced were pretty much similar to what was forun on the street, but as for now, well no way to know.
|
||
|
5 Dec 2001, 12:58 (Ref:182475) | #7 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 752
|
Personally, I think when they stopped using "stock" cars, they should have stopped calling them Stock Cars. There isn't anything "stock" in NASCAR anymore.
|
||
|
5 Dec 2001, 14:24 (Ref:182512) | #8 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 400
|
A more approprite term might be "stock-appearing", but it would be somewhat awkard, "hey, we're going to a stock-appearing car race today." I think "stock car" is the most effective term that they can use to identify with a full-bodied race car. Besides, they aren't trying to deceive anyone, today's fans know that a car runing around Daytona or Bristol shares very little, besides the name-plate with what they drive on the street.
|
||
|
6 Dec 2001, 07:37 (Ref:182843) | #9 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 1,370
|
Quote:
Last edited by Joe Fan; 6 Dec 2001 at 07:39. |
|||
|