|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
11 Oct 2023, 13:12 (Ref:4180992) | #1 | ||
Race Official
20KPINAL
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 23,337
|
Penalties and their effectiveness.
Penalties and their effectiveness.
In the aftermath of the Quatar Grand Prix and the plethora of penalties handed out for drivers exceeding the track limits, how effective are the penalties? |
||
__________________
"If you're not winning you're not trying." Colin Chapman. |
11 Oct 2023, 14:57 (Ref:4181004) | #2 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 3,564
|
Most races go by without track limit infringements. And other races such as Qatar and Austria and a small number of others have seemingly regular / constant infringements by many / most drivers at some point over the weekend. It's largely the fault of the track layout combined with the interpretation taken of what constitutes an infringement.
Either relax the rules and let ALL the drivers find the fastest way around the track OR put in some way of slowing the cars down if they venture off track - such as slippery Astroturf or raised kurbs. I doubt any fan wants to see situations where loads of qualy times are deleted and loads of drivers get penalties during the race for venturing one inch over a painted white line. |
||
__________________
It's just my opinion. |
11 Oct 2023, 19:00 (Ref:4181025) | #3 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,914
|
Quote:
The classic example of all of this being solved (rather harshly) is street circuits such as Monaco in which "track limits" is frequently defined by a barrier. As to timeliness of the penalty, is it immediate as you know you have hit the wall. As to effectiveness of the penalty it is also very effective as typically be over right on the spot. This topic has been discussed ad nauseum. With solutions ranging from walls to various surface such as gravel and low grip AstroTurf. In the "Rate the GP" thread, Teretonga mentioned the use technology to implement a virtual wall. We have talked on/off about geofencing as well. I like the idea of geofencing, but it would take some work to implement and make it accurate. As I call out above, there needs to be nearly instantaneous detection and penalty application. I feel like at the moment that the escalation from warning to penalty is too lenient. As mentioned above, the walls at Monaco don't give warnings. Maybe the closest thing to a warning at Monaco is a close brush that doesn't do damage to your car. But a barrier doesn't care if it was your first or tenth mistake on a particular corner. As mentioned above, it seems some circuits have this problem more than others. And clearly there will be some circuits in which the most optimal line will result in pushing the envelope with regards to track limits which other circuits that optimal line may not create that same level of risk. You could revise circuits so that the risk is reduced or removed, but I think that takes away part of the skill of driving. That part of that is knowing that you sometimes have to give it up in a corner to stay on the circuit as the alternative might be a DNF. So in short, I like the idea of geofencing if it can be realized in a cost effective and accurate way. I think penalties should be dealt with quickly and maybe even in an automated way (no need for stewards to "review") if the geofencing technology is showing track boundary issues (remember it needs to be accurate... few if any false positives) then the penalty should be costly and immediately applied. As to what that penalty is, I can't say. I think in a perfect world, it would be something like an automatic reduction in car power for a specific period of time. There would need to be work to implement that in a safe and controlled way (you don't want to drop power and cause a car to unexpectantly slow in front of a following driver, or cause the car to become unstable and loose control, etc.) All of this is looking for a lot of complicated technical solutions. I think they are achievable, but probably cutting edge and maybe not what F1 would want to tackle right now. Richard |
||
__________________
To paraphrase Mark Twain... "I'm sorry I wrote such a long post; I didn't have time to write a short one." |
11 Oct 2023, 19:06 (Ref:4181027) | #4 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 1,096
|
Quote:
|
||
__________________
Ten-tenths Predictions Contest World Champion of 2022 |
11 Oct 2023, 19:25 (Ref:4181031) | #5 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,914
|
Quote:
Richard |
||
__________________
To paraphrase Mark Twain... "I'm sorry I wrote such a long post; I didn't have time to write a short one." |
11 Oct 2023, 20:30 (Ref:4181034) | #6 | |
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 129
|
The reason they can do it at Monaco is that the physical barrier is visible from where they sit whereas the painted line is not. Why is anyone surprised they go over a painted line, in some cases by millimetres, when they can’t see the line as they get nearer to it? I get that there is a large element of risk v reward so drivers will take much more risk with a painted line track limit than they will with a barrier but even when there was real risk of qualifying being ruined, we still saw lots of extremely capable drivers go over the limit by a tiny amount.
|
|
|
11 Oct 2023, 19:04 (Ref:4181026) | #7 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 1,096
|
Quote:
Quote:
The penalty system that most annoys me at the moment is the five second penalties for causing a collision that totally destroys another driver's race at no cost to your own, like Hamilton on Piastri in Monza, Perez on Albon in Singapore. In Suzuka, Lando Norris' best chance of winning would be to accidentally punt Verstappen out of the race at Spoon curve in such a way that doesn't damage his own car, as all he would have got would be a five-second penalty and his margin over Oscar Piastri was much greater than that. Which is a complete joke. |
|||
__________________
Ten-tenths Predictions Contest World Champion of 2022 |
11 Oct 2023, 21:40 (Ref:4181038) | #8 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 110
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
12 Oct 2023, 10:40 (Ref:4181085) | #9 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 3,564
|
Everyone seems to be using Monaco with its walls as the basis for comparisons. Monaco is a freak track, and at the risk of annoying absolutely everyone on this thread, I don't think that is the best comparison at all.
We don't tend to get multiple track limit infringements at plenty of "normal" tracks that don't have walls. Why is that? |
||
__________________
It's just my opinion. |
12 Oct 2023, 17:22 (Ref:4181144) | #10 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,914
|
Quote:
Quote:
Imagine if there were little or no curbs on circuits and everything was well paved. Just painted lines. Chicanes would be shortcut to the fullest extent. Everyone would run super wide on fast sweepers that lead to long straights in attempts to carry as much speed through and out of the corner. And not all corners are equal with respect to impact on lap time. So we will see some corners be problems more than others. Richard |
|||
__________________
To paraphrase Mark Twain... "I'm sorry I wrote such a long post; I didn't have time to write a short one." |
13 Oct 2023, 08:41 (Ref:4181231) | #11 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 3,564
|
Quote:
Blame drivers if just one of two of them transgress. But when you have hundreds of transgressions by all or almost all the drivers then a solution must be found rather than simply blaming the drivers. |
|||
__________________
It's just my opinion. |
13 Oct 2023, 08:50 (Ref:4181233) | #12 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 5,645
|
Quote:
If you are referring to the GP at Qatar, then I do believe that only 3 out of 20 drivers were penalised during the race. I appreciate that you may be exaggerating for effect, so I do believe that you can blame the drivers. I find it difficult to agree with your proposition that it is always the fault of the circuit, when you can often, or maybe usually, see that the drivers that set the fastest laps of a race are not those that do not constantly abuse track limits. So it does prove that it is the drivers at fault. |
|||
|
13 Oct 2023, 10:01 (Ref:4181244) | #13 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 3,564
|
Quote:
In Austria there were 1,200. Simply telling the drivers to not do it will not work. https://www.autosport.com/f1/news/fi...n-gp/10490773/ |
|||
__________________
It's just my opinion. |
13 Oct 2023, 13:15 (Ref:4181263) | #14 | ||||||||||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,914
|
Quote:
You ask for comments regarding a circuit such as Silverstone. Of which I do explain in that same post. However I talk generically. But if you want specifics, then here is my thoughts regarding Silverstone. But first, a small pre-amble. Generally when track limits are exceeded it is either cutting a corner on the inside or running wide on the exit. And the main issue we see is running wide on exists. But I will talk a bit to both. Silverstone seems to primarily stop this by strategic red sausage curbs. These are not tempting to ride as the circuit is quick and you typically will have the car on edge and riding those high curbs at speeds will risk damage or crashing. A few corners have walls on the inside such as Copse, but in reality it really is the placement of sausage curbs. I also think the circuit design doesn't have much in then way of "running wide gains time" except for maybe the exit of Stowe. And if I remember correctly this is exactly a place where track limits can be a problem at Silverstone. Lastly, I "think" Silverstone is one of the wider tracks. So the wider the track, the more likely that the naturally fast line will NOT exceed the limits of the circuit. If you were to trim off the outside width on some corners you probably would increase the likelyhood for track limit violations. Especially if the ability to run wide was not risky to the car. I say all of this without really being particularly knowledgeable of Silverstone and might have missed some details. At the end of the day, the same issues apply at Silverstone. I just use Monaco as the example because it is an extreme example with many of it's "curbs" being barriers. Ok, so apologies for this string of quotes and replies. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I will try to shut up on this topic. I think I have voiced my displeasure enough. I frankly am not really upset about it. I am more interested in potential solutions than arguing details as to the cause. Apologies if my forceful arguments came across as unfriendly as well. Richard Last edited by Richard C; 13 Oct 2023 at 13:21. |
||||||||||
__________________
To paraphrase Mark Twain... "I'm sorry I wrote such a long post; I didn't have time to write a short one." |
13 Oct 2023, 13:44 (Ref:4181267) | #15 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 5,645
|
Richard, you make the valid point that the drivers do not actually have to see where the edge of the track is because they should already have that planted firmly in their minds - I mean, what is the point of drivers doing track walks if not to understand where every things is? - and this is an argument that I have had in various threads concerning our BTCC saloons.
A few of the tracks that these cars race at have tyre stacks at known track limit problems, usually chicanes. Unfortunately, if hit, they cause damage to the cars, but what I have tried to explain is that these stack are static - they don't jump out to catch out the unwary, so the drivers are, or should be, fully aware of them. But they all drive so close to them that it doesn't take long for them to be hit, often by multiple cars in one incident because following drivers, rather than driving their own race, are totally focused on the car/s in front of them. |
||
|
12 Oct 2023, 12:58 (Ref:4181098) | #16 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 11,221
|
Every track should have a minimum of 2 metre strip of grass which lines the track. What you then have beyond that (tarmac or gravel) is open to discussion but as a means of controlling track limits I can think of no better solution.
|
||
|
12 Oct 2023, 15:19 (Ref:4181121) | #17 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 5,645
|
Quote:
As we saw on Sunday with the BTCC, grass is not necessarily the answer, and that grass was at least damp if not wet; it certainly was wet on the other side of the track. |
|||
|
12 Oct 2023, 16:34 (Ref:4181136) | #18 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,899
|
I agree that grass is not slippery enough. In my head I am picturing some sort nylon or teflon plates screwed down into a tarmac or concrete base. Then if necessary they could be removed for MotoGP. However the bikes are also beginning to demonstrate a track limits problem and that slippery border would definitely be a serious disincentive to running wide. Unfortunately deliberately installing something that will almost certainly cause bikes to crash may be a step too far.
|
||
__________________
The older I get, the faster I was. |
12 Oct 2023, 15:43 (Ref:4181128) | #19 | |||
Race Official
20KPINAL
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 23,337
|
Quote:
MotoGP shares some circuits with F1, Quatar is one of them. I confess I know very little about MotoGP, however would not a 2 meter grass strip lining the track be dangerous for riders? |
|||
__________________
"If you're not winning you're not trying." Colin Chapman. |
13 Oct 2023, 09:26 (Ref:4181238) | #20 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 11,221
|
|||
|
13 Oct 2023, 14:54 (Ref:4181277) | #21 | ||
Race Official
20KPINAL
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 23,337
|
|||
__________________
"If you're not winning you're not trying." Colin Chapman. |
13 Oct 2023, 06:56 (Ref:4181223) | #22 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,662
|
I'm (just) old enough to remember race circuits (or have at least seen films/pictures) where there were no kerbs at the edge of the track. I seem to think that they were introduced to prevent the grass at the edge of the track being worn down by drivers cutting the corner and creating a dangerous hole at the side of the circuit.
I've also seen a picture somewhere of Copse Corner at Silverstone from the mid to late 60's (it was of a Mark 1 Escort Saloon Car) where the inside edge of the track was lined with square breeze blocks! You wouldn't want to go near to those... |
||
__________________
Incognito: An Italian phrase meaning Nice Gearchange! |
13 Oct 2023, 09:10 (Ref:4181234) | #23 | ||
Team Crouton
20KPINAL
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 39,623
|
Well, on a very simplistic level, the drivers are the ones with a steering wheel and control over where they put the car on the circuit, aren't they.....? I'm going out this morning down to the shops, I could drive over the curbs here and there and drive over the pavement in places to get me past traffic and potentially get me there fractionally quicker, but I don't, as that would be foolish and it's not allowed as I am supposed to drive on the road. I know that. So do all the other drivers. The fact that the pavement might look inviting to me or give me some advantage due to the design of the road is neither here nor there.
|
||
__________________
23 days... |
13 Oct 2023, 09:27 (Ref:4181239) | #24 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 18,459
|
The problem is the tracks these days allow drivers to get away with more than they did back in the day. But what's worse is now there are places where using the runoff is quicker. So they need to get rid of it in places where an advantage can be gained. It's that simple in my book. These track limit penalties are too much and clearly aren't a deterrent
|
|
__________________
He who dares wins! He who hesitates is lost! |
13 Oct 2023, 15:45 (Ref:4181283) | #25 | ||
Team Crouton
20KPINAL
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 39,623
|
But are they such minor infringements when they happen so often? What do you do when drivers are incapable of applying the discipline to drive on the actual circuit? Just ignore it and let them do it? Then you effectively 'punish' those who actually drive where they're supposed to. That's far more nonsensical, surely?
|
||
__________________
23 days... |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Reducing the effectiveness of a brake servo | Greystone | Racing Technology | 11 | 14 Aug 2007 14:47 |
Did the Astons/Corvettes run with any ballast/penalties to their cars? | Mindspin13B | Sportscar & GT Racing | 10 | 18 Jun 2007 15:31 |
Change to Stop and go penalties (merged) | Inigo Montoya | Formula One | 29 | 19 Jan 2004 09:50 |
Weight Penalties | Lee Purnell | National & Club Racing | 1 | 1 May 2000 22:21 |