 |
|
6 Jul 2012, 09:12
|
#286
|
|
Llama Assassin and Sheep Botherer
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2002
|
International Sheep Ambassador |
Posts: 3,140
|
Quote:
|
There is also the operational conflict with the horse racing and training that Counties Racing Club undertakes at the same location. The Counties Racing Club is a horse racing club so their heart is not in motor racing.
|
Only thing I've ever heard from them is there delighted to have another revenue stream,the hayburners arent a huge pot of gold.
Parking no problem,get the guys who organised the A1GP to do it,parking at Taupo was a breeze.
Hampton Downs is in the wrong county,they need to move it a kilometer to the west over the Auckland City boundary,they'll never get any funds out of Waikato.Actually heard someone on the radio ask the question today "why did they ever build it,when theres another track so close?."
Looking on google earth theres a big empty paddock at the end of the main straight,just buy it and extend the run off so theres no chicane.
|
|
__________________
Statistics show the average F1 fan thinks about sheep 1.8 times a day.
|
6 Jul 2012, 09:55
|
#287
|
|
Racer
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 237
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RogerH
As a taxpayer and ratepayer it is a concern that some of "my" money is being given to a private organisation (Counties Racing Club) to improve their asset.
|
From my understanding ATEED already had a budget of $xxx to spend on attracting tourism to Auckland.
They looked at where to spend it to get good tourism to Auckland and decided that this was a good way to do it.
Those that think they should not spend it.
what would they rather do with it?
Support 200 local community events at 10K each?
The money would still get spent, just on lots of lesser events.
ATEED managed the coordination of Auckland Council’s $102 million towards ensuring Auckland businesses were prepared to maximise the economic benefit opportunities presented by the RWC.
$2m to an internation event is probably not much to them.
|
|
|
6 Jul 2012, 10:57
|
#288
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 728
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DX20VT
From my understanding ATEED already had a budget of $xxx to spend on attracting tourism to Auckland.
They looked at where to spend it to get good tourism to Auckland and decided that this was a good way to do it.
|
exactly. i don't hear to much vocal negativity regarding thier investment in a central south island gravel basher
|
|
|
6 Jul 2012, 23:34
|
#289
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
|
Sthrn Highlands NSW, Australie |
Posts: 2,703
|
Puke
Quote:
Originally Posted by RogerH
From a competitor perspective it will be good to see Pukekohe upgraded into a more user friendly track. It is disappointing that the main quality of Pukekohe being it's history and character is being detrimentally effected by the addition of a chicane on the back straight.
As a taxpayer and ratepayer it is a concern that some of "my" money is being given to a private organisation (Counties Racing Club) to improve their asset.
The figures put out by ATEED to justify Auckland City's investment seem a bit hard to believe. I suppose it is the old bureaucratic trick of altering the figures related to the proposed benefits in order to give the answer that you need - its all based on assumptions on top of assumptions.
Pukekohe has some inherent issues that seem to have been ignored. It is now in a location that is becoming increasing developed. This reduces the land available for such things as car parking and places environmental pressures with neighbours over such things as noise pollution - these issues will only get worse.
There is also the operational conflict with the horse racing and training that Counties Racing Club undertakes at the same location. The Counties Racing Club is a horse racing club so their heart is not in motor racing.
The traffic access to the Pukekohe track is much worse than Hampton Downs. The track is some 20 minutes off the motorway (when travelling from Auckland) and any large spectator attendance will quickly congest the Manakau and Buckland Road accesses.
On balance it seems that the financial and operational aspects are a bit suspect.
|
Just a few comments from an Aussie....
Sad that they are adding the chicane...and you can bet it will be a "Mickey Mouse" affair... I hope they check the local geology after years of liquifaction by those trains rumbling past ;-)
The fact that Puke is largely controlled by the horse racing fraternity will always be an issue....however, there is absolutely no reason why improvements can't be carried out just about everywhere at the track....any facilty can be rejuvenated (assuming politics don't get on the way)
As for Hampton Downs...well what a crying shame your local body didn't go for two rounds, alternate rounds or some other arrangement where the magnificent HD circuit could step up a notch...it is better than a few Aussie tracks in terms of facilities...
I'll get my coat! (said a man from Parmy once :-)
|
|
__________________
The good old days sure seem like a long time ago!!
|
9 Jul 2012, 04:40
|
#290
|
|
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 211
|
Quote "It is disappointing that the main quality of Pukekohe being it's history and character is being detrimentally effected by the addition of a chicane on the back straight."
They ran with a chicane on the back straight and on top of the hill in the 70's around the time that they changed from F5000s to Pacifics. I remember Brian Redman running through both on the first lap in has Pacific car. Crowd loved it. Certainly created some action on top of the hill when they used it. A few spins etc under braking.
Would be better reopening the hill stand one and leaving the back straight as it is.
Can see it here in this pic;
|
|
|
11 Jul 2012, 00:15
|
#291
|
|
Racer
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 396
|
I understand that as well as the chicane in the back straight the configuration of the track at the "hill" is going to be altered so that the speed coming onto the front straight is reduced. Evidently the same is happening at other parts of the track - maybe going onto the back straight. Additionally the existing armco is going to be replaced with the Hamilton concrete barriers expect on the front straight as the barriers would interrupt the view to the horse racing track.
Sounds like a lot of the character and speed of the existing Pukekohe track is going to be lost.
|
|
|
11 Jul 2012, 00:33
|
#292
|
|
10-10ths offical Trekkie
Veteran
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3,356
|
To be honest, I always thought most of Pukekohe was a single file track with the only decent passing opportunity was the back straight hairpin. Little sad to see a chicane on the straight himself but it's in the interest of safety and if it present's itself as a passing opportunity I'm for it. In terms of the alterations at the final turn up the crest, I'm all for it as I've always seen it as a one line, single file track that if a driver goes offline they're gonna be deep into the barrier and a decent chance to roll the car back onto the track. (What Brad Jones and Paul Morris did back in 2007)
|
|
__________________
Didn't look out below so watch the window, right out the window, what it meant to be, will eventually be a memory of a WINDOW
|
11 Jul 2012, 02:03
|
#293
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 1,885
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Razor
To be honest, I always thought most of Pukekohe was a single file track with the only decent passing opportunity was the back straight hairpin. Little sad to see a chicane on the straight himself but it's in the interest of safety and if it present's itself as a passing opportunity I'm for it. In terms of the alterations at the final turn up the crest, I'm all for it as I've always seen it as a one line, single file track that if a driver goes offline they're gonna be deep into the barrier and a decent chance to roll the car back onto the track. (What Brad Jones and Paul Morris did back in 2007)
|
I agree that the speed onto the front straight could be reduced (or the camber or line altered) because that is one spot where if you get it wrong you are all over the show and even over the safety fence, as I saw Mitch(?) Evans do one year in a GT3. Really lucky nobody was on the other side of that fence at the time, 50 metres further and it could have been 20 kids that were hurt or worse.
But I disagree that there is only one passing spot at Puke, there is the hairpin under brakes, yes, but also the front straight out of the corner, the Castrol Esses and the back straight itself - I've seen people pass every which way (and loose) around there, just takes a bit of skill and balls of steel...
|
|
__________________
Great movie quotes number 225 - "Are you okay?"
"No man, I'm pretty ****in' far from okay!"
|
11 Jul 2012, 02:21
|
#294
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,942
|
Swap Mitch Evans with Dean Fulford, Goaty!
|
|
__________________
The voices inside my head may not be real, but some of their ideas are absolutely brilliant!!!
|
11 Jul 2012, 03:35
|
#295
|
|
Racer
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 107
|
So how do you Aucklandrers fare when you help pay 6.6m to do up a horse track in Pukekohe that has no impact on yourself, remember that having a race in the middle of Auckland and Hamilton wont help sell hotel beds as its only an hour away anyway and then........how do you feel that part of your 6.6m donation is buying back pit buildings and infastructure from V8 Supercars that they nicked from Hamilton for 1.1m? Another example of Cochrane bullying people that have no value of money and clearly on this occasion along with Hamilton, has Aced Auckland city councillors. How does this happen?
|
|
|
11 Jul 2012, 03:41
|
#296
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 8,478
|
Are they buying the stufff back from V8 supercars Racer Mike
isnt that something v8 supercars are bringing to the table as their part of the upgrade.
something they purchased for $1.1 million
|
|
__________________
I've been debating what was more memorable. the 1977 ford 1-2 at Bathurst or Armstrong landing on the moon
|
11 Jul 2012, 05:47
|
#297
|
|
Racer
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 107
|
Thats what I've been told and not for 1.1m either.
|
|
|
11 Jul 2012, 06:22
|
#298
|
|
Racer
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 205
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Racer Mike
So how do you Aucklandrers fare when you help pay 6.6m to do up a horse track in Pukekohe that has no impact on yourself, remember that having a race in the middle of Auckland and Hamilton wont help sell hotel beds as its only an hour away anyway and then........how do you feel that part of your 6.6m donation is buying back pit buildings and infastructure from V8 Supercars that they nicked from Hamilton for 1.1m? Another example of Cochrane bullying people that have no value of money and clearly on this occasion along with Hamilton, has Aced Auckland city councillors. How does this happen?
|
COOL....so based on the size of the supercity catchment the v8sc at puke is gonna cost you about $5 as a rate payer over 5 years......awesome...you should be stoked and go and enjoy the weekend.......and you as a rate payer also score the hamilton infrastructure to boot....even beter ...WOOHOO ...bring it on...
if you are still not happy PM me and i will be happy to give you 5 bucks....
|
|
|
11 Jul 2012, 09:34
|
#299
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 765
|
yeah actually as a rate payer and a petrol head i dont mind paying for some of this, i just want to see the V8SC's back in NZ so agree with harcey totally
next big question for me though, if they are adding more chicanes and effectively taking the real high speed nature out of Puke then what will V8SC lap times be like compared to a V8ST?
|
|
|
11 Jul 2012, 10:13
|
#300
|
|
Racer
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 237
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NZSTfan
big question for me though, what will V8SC lap times be like compared to a V8ST?
|
Why would it matter, they are not going to be in the same race????
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|