Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Single Seater Racing > National & International Single Seaters

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 6 Oct 2002, 10:31 (Ref:396765)   #51
Morcilman
Racer
 
Morcilman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Spain
Spain
Posts: 357
Morcilman should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
If his career is over or harmed, is only his fault, nobodys else. If he has not smoked wich is unlikelly (because if the substance shows because passive smoking it shows in some determined quantities, and enges was like 10 times more)is still his fault. I know many drivers that leave a building if somebudy is smoking drugs. If he was having a parti with pot smokers arrownd him is still a big mistake and his own.
Morcilman is offline  
Quote
Old 6 Oct 2002, 16:11 (Ref:396960)   #52
Don K
Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,727
Don K has a lot of promise if they can keep it on the circuit!
Quote:
Originally posted by Morcilman
I know many drivers that leave a building if somebudy is smoking drugs.
How do they know? Are all drivers supposed to recognize the smell?

Quote:
If he has not smoked wich is unlikelly (because if the substance shows because passive smoking it shows in some determined quantities, and enges was like 10 times more) is still his fault.
And what if someone drugged him, for instance by offering him a piece of space cake? Are all drivers supposed to recognize space cake on sight/smell/taste/whatever?
Are all friends and relatives of sportsmen supposed to know which food items (like coffee, poppy seed bread, ...) may contain illegal ingredients?
Suppose it happened during an event organized by his sponsor (or his teams' sponsor). Would his contract allow him to leave the building whenever he suspects someone is using some illegal substance?
Don K is offline  
Quote
Old 6 Oct 2002, 23:42 (Ref:397205)   #53
paul-collins
Veteran
 
paul-collins's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Canada
Mosport on a good day
Posts: 5,147
paul-collins should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridpaul-collins should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridpaul-collins should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Quote:
Originally posted by Morcilman
If he has not smoked wich is unlikelly (because if the substance shows because passive smoking it shows in some determined quantities, and enges was like 10 times more)is still his fault.
Really? I know nothing about the numbers. In fact, I didn't even see his test quantity.

Could you enlighten me on this?
paul-collins is offline  
__________________
... Since all men live in darkness, who believes something is not a test of whether it is true or false. I have spent years trying to get people to ask simple questions: What is the evidence, and what does it mean?

-Bill James
Quote
Old 7 Oct 2002, 10:06 (Ref:397388)   #54
Ria
Rookie
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location:
Somewhere on Planet Earth!
Posts: 17
Ria should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Some of you have failed to notice that Tomas was NOT sponsored by Coca-Cola 2002 season.....Coke were still sponsoring Nordic Racing.

For what it's worth....in my opinion....Tomas is a true Champion in every sense of the word!!!

Last edited by Ria; 7 Oct 2002 at 10:06.
Ria is offline  
Quote
Old 7 Oct 2002, 10:52 (Ref:397416)   #55
Super Tourer
Subscriber
Veteran
 
Super Tourer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
United Kingdom
East Anglia
Posts: 4,304
Super Tourer should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridSuper Tourer should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridSuper Tourer should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridSuper Tourer should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Thomas won the series fair and square, cannabis is not a performance enhancing drug, whatever the circumstances are that allowed it to enter his body, it doesn't diminsh the job he did on the track.

Can't help feeling that there is an element of double standard with the FIA. They have used the letter of the law in Enge's case, yet let Arrows miss Grand Prix with out a word, when they are clearly in breach of the concorde agreement - in which case they should have been excluded with the usual right to appeal if they have a case....But then again Thomas is only 1 driver and Arrow's are team.
Super Tourer is offline  
__________________
'I've seen it, but still don't believe it.....'
Quote
Old 8 Oct 2002, 10:44 (Ref:398211)   #56
TTT
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I think it was a political decision, rather than a sporting one.

We all know Enge won the championship, we all know cannabis does not enhance performance. We also know that motor racing has a carefully manicured PR image to uphold regardless of cost. Corporations (sponsors) do not want to be associated with "drug use" because they are (ahem) all so squeaky clean and non corrupt themselves and this could damage their own "holier than thou" reputations. . . .
 
Quote
Old 8 Oct 2002, 10:52 (Ref:398215)   #57
DanFlag
Veteran
 
DanFlag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Canada
Montréal, Québec, Canada
Posts: 1,473
DanFlag should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridDanFlag should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally posted by TTT
I think it was a political decision, rather than a sporting one.

We all know Enge won the championship, we all know cannabis does not enhance performance. We also know that motor racing has a carefully manicured PR image to uphold regardless of cost. Corporations (sponsors) do not want to be associated with "drug use" because they are (ahem) all so squeaky clean and non corrupt themselves and this could damage their own "holier than thou" reputations. . . .
While I completely agree with Liz comments on page 1, I agree with yours too TTT
DanFlag is offline  
Quote
Old 8 Oct 2002, 12:05 (Ref:398289)   #58
JohnSSC
Veteran
 
JohnSSC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Slovenia
Pittsburgh
Posts: 5,073
JohnSSC has a real shot at the podium!JohnSSC has a real shot at the podium!JohnSSC has a real shot at the podium!JohnSSC has a real shot at the podium!JohnSSC has a real shot at the podium!
I think there should be a thread started to discuss the "Is the drug in question good or bad?"

As has been stated before (and I would like to see the wording in the regs, not what it is "assumed" to be), if the rules say you cannot use certain drugs, then you cannot use them - period. Whether the rest of the world agrees or not or if medical science agrees or not is a specious arguement. The governing body dumped on him because he broke the rules.

I know as a former competitor that I would have a real low tolerance for another driver who had been using recently and all the bickering here about how X is really not that bad or as bad as Y - bottom line is anything that could even remotely dull performance is a bad thing when you are wheel-to-wheel at 150 mph. Tomas knew better. He knew the rules. He knew the potential consequences. He did it anyway so he (and we) should accept the punishment.

As far as bringing up Al, Jr. or Hunt - if the sanctioning bodies knew about it (particularly Al) at the time then Al would never have hit the track. I do not think that the regs governing F1 in Hunt's day even addressed this.
JohnSSC is offline  
__________________
"He's still a young guy and I always think, slightly morbidly, the last thing you learn is how to die and at the end of the day everybody learns every single day." - The Ever-Cheerfull Ron Dennis on Lewis Hamilton.
Quote
Old 8 Oct 2002, 14:07 (Ref:398380)   #59
paul-collins
Veteran
 
paul-collins's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Canada
Mosport on a good day
Posts: 5,147
paul-collins should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridpaul-collins should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridpaul-collins should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Quote:
Originally posted by JohnSSC
As has been stated before (and I would like to see the wording in the regs, not what it is "assumed" to be), if the rules say you cannot use certain drugs, then you cannot use them - period. Whether the rest of the world agrees or not or if medical science agrees or not is a specious arguement. The governing body dumped on him because he broke the rules.
Which I think everyone is agreeing to, here. As did Tomas.
Quote:
Originally posted by JohnSSC
I know as a former competitor that I would have a real low tolerance for another driver who had been using recently and all the bickering here about how X is really not that bad or as bad as Y - bottom line is anything that could even remotely dull performance is a bad thing when you are wheel-to-wheel at 150 mph.
But this is the crux of the argument. If the marijuana is detectable 2, 4, even 6 weeks (as some have asserted here) after consumption, then what does detection mean? It certainly won't have any correlation with effect on performance.
paul-collins is offline  
__________________
... Since all men live in darkness, who believes something is not a test of whether it is true or false. I have spent years trying to get people to ask simple questions: What is the evidence, and what does it mean?

-Bill James
Quote
Old 8 Oct 2002, 19:42 (Ref:398629)   #60
Morcilman
Racer
 
Morcilman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Spain
Spain
Posts: 357
Morcilman should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
My information and a really good article about it cames from the Auto Hebdo French magacine, it was very clear the complete procss and the quantities. I dont have it any more, does somebody have it? can he translate it?
Morcilman is offline  
Quote
Old 10 Oct 2002, 00:28 (Ref:399845)   #61
Mekola
Veteran
 
Mekola's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Kiribati
Atlantis
Posts: 6,635
Mekola should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridMekola should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridMekola should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
When I read that Enge was proved positive in doping, I was
afraid that his title will be in risk. And I was right to be afraid. Tomas won the title on the road but lose it in the laboratory: the positive doping in Hungary dropped his race win and bring the title to Sebastien Bourdais.
I know one precedent in lower formula, when in 1999 Gabriele Varano also tested positive (also for cannabis) after the Binetto round of the Italian F3 of that year. The consequences were more terrible than Enge's case: Varano lost all his points of that year (losing also the Melandri trophy for rookies) and was banned for racing for six months.
Varano don't lose the place into motorsport for the doping: next year Piercarlo Ghinzani contracted him for his Italian (now Euro) F3000 team, but must wait until the fourth race to giving him the ride. Later he bring up to International F3000 at the start of 2001 with Prost, and some time after lose the seat and went back to Euro F3000 for a while.
At last, I think it was a shame that a great eastern european driver like Enge lost a title in this form. But the rules are the rules.
Mekola is offline  
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Enge loses F3000 title Bibendum Formula One 79 8 Oct 2002 16:40
Tomas Enge 2002 F3000 Champ!! Popas National & International Single Seaters 15 15 Sep 2002 16:08
F3000 Title decider: Who will win? Mark F1 National & International Single Seaters 11 14 Sep 2002 01:42
Tomas Enge racer69 Formula One 3 14 Nov 2001 19:32
F3000: Tomas Scheckter replaces Sarazin Gerard National & International Single Seaters 3 18 Jul 2000 22:32


All times are GMT. The time now is 17:49.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.