|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
19 Nov 2010, 18:52 (Ref:2793193) | #226 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 544
|
|||
__________________
Louise: Is the track Slippery when Wet? DC: I didn't know you were a Bon Jovi fan |
19 Nov 2010, 20:43 (Ref:2793243) | #227 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 874
|
Quote:
It's worrying to think that the whole Lotus brand (Group Lotus, Team Lotus, whatever) could be set to tar F1 with this warring over the rights. Me no like. |
|||
__________________
Belgian GP commentary: "Friday morning was nice and sunny - but not for Erik Comas, who crashed heavily." |
19 Nov 2010, 20:50 (Ref:2793245) | #228 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 11,221
|
So, Gascoyne's team will effectively become "Proton" and the current Renault team will become "Team Lotus"?
|
||
|
19 Nov 2010, 20:50 (Ref:2793246) | #229 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,100
|
Quote:
To me that's why I've getting a few truck loads of salt delivered to my place to take with that news story. Not as if I'd trust a local paper - even if it's a Norfolk one - to produce such high level motorsport news before Autosport et al. |
|||
__________________
Marbot : "Ironically, the main difference between a Red Bull and a Virgin is that Red Bull can make parts of its car smaller and floppier." |
20 Nov 2010, 18:11 (Ref:2793522) | #230 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,107
|
Apparently Joe Saward doesn't read the Norfolk paper! Who seem to have everything the wrong way around, incidentally. There is no way Renault F1 will be called Team Lotus unless they bought the rights to do so off David Hunt and/or Fernandes, which would have been big news.
And 'Proton 1 Malaysia F1'? The same Proton Fernandes is having legal battles with over the Lotus name. Nonsense, surely. |
||
|
20 Nov 2010, 18:22 (Ref:2793524) | #231 | |||
Race Official
20KPINAL
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 23,339
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
"If you're not winning you're not trying." Colin Chapman. |
20 Nov 2010, 18:25 (Ref:2793526) | #232 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,100
|
Come to think of it, the local newspaper might have got everything wrong and got things right in the same way in Renault becomes Proton 1Malaysia F1 (the worst team name I've heard in motorsport ever). Out of interest I have whoised saveteamlotus.com, like most things these days it's with anonymous domain hosting (and I can't blame anyone), but it was registered last Sunday (for readers in the future - the 14th of November 2010). Sadly any long statement of an opinion in the format of a website will remind viewers of Time Cube, but even so, this looks largely factually accurate, and if it is it looks damning.
As a fan of motorsport and a person who appreciates good engineering, I'd probably be more confident if the Lotus road car operation - in my opinion, in terms of name (admittedly largely cultivated through motorsport) second only to Ferrari - was in the hands of Tony Fernandes rather than Proton. I have a great deal of respect for what Tony Fernandes has achieved. Before he entered F1, he bought a failing airline from the Malaysian government for less than the amount of change I have in my pocket (he bought it for about 50p or something) a few months after 9/11 wiped huge amounts of money out of the airline industry and turned it in to a roaring success. His F1 team has been run well, a genuine resurrection of what is one of England's greatest sports teams ever, getting 10th in the WCC despite having the least preparation. Together with Mike Gascoyne (and I feel that they have a great working relationship from what I've seen outside, he's finally found a team where they'll let him actually design a car) they have built up a great team that can do great things in the future (certainly next year I would not be surprised if they are right on the back of the main pack or in it, although they would not be failures if that was not the case). It would be a shame if some suits in Kuala Lumpur or the new CEO they have just hired, aiming to pursue a risky strategy of trying to enter a crowded market place where his former employer was a big player, wrecked this good work. Last edited by duke_toaster; 20 Nov 2010 at 18:33. |
||
__________________
Marbot : "Ironically, the main difference between a Red Bull and a Virgin is that Red Bull can make parts of its car smaller and floppier." |
20 Nov 2010, 19:06 (Ref:2793533) | #233 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,107
|
What I find really damming is all the Group Lotus promotional material featuring Team Lotus cars that the website brings up. It would be hilarious if, as a result of pressing the matter of 'Team Lotus' through the courts, the ended up having to pay compensation for improper use of TL trademarks
|
||
|
20 Nov 2010, 19:08 (Ref:2793535) | #234 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,100
|
That would have to be a separate legal case, but it would still be interesting to see if Team Lotus won, the reaction amongst the suits in Kuala Lumpur would be pay per view material.
|
||
__________________
Marbot : "Ironically, the main difference between a Red Bull and a Virgin is that Red Bull can make parts of its car smaller and floppier." |
20 Nov 2010, 20:25 (Ref:2793570) | #235 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 7,979
|
||
|
21 Nov 2010, 11:58 (Ref:2793797) | #236 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,100
|
Quick point, Group Lotus appear to have the teamlotus.com web domain, a quick whois shows they updated it on the 27th of October this year. I remember a while ago teamlotus.com going to one of those "this domain is free, meanwhile here's a dodgy search" things.
|
||
__________________
Marbot : "Ironically, the main difference between a Red Bull and a Virgin is that Red Bull can make parts of its car smaller and floppier." |
21 Nov 2010, 13:59 (Ref:2793829) | #237 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 335
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
21 Nov 2010, 18:57 (Ref:2793913) | #238 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 827
|
Now there is a website dedicated to the matter.http://www.saveteamlotus.com some fairly entrenched opinions there.
|
|
|
21 Nov 2010, 19:32 (Ref:2793926) | #239 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,100
|
I've heard that that account is based on David Hunt.
|
||
__________________
Marbot : "Ironically, the main difference between a Red Bull and a Virgin is that Red Bull can make parts of its car smaller and floppier." |
21 Nov 2010, 20:27 (Ref:2793944) | #240 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,385
|
perhaps the more significant element is that Lotus Racing (TF) had licensed the name from Group Lotus. If it could not enter under Lotus Racing it would have to lose the money it had earned under the 2010 season for 10th team in the championship, just as the money earned by Honda was forfeited when it had to apply for entry under the name Brawn.
Lotus Racing would have to reapply under a new name, and in doing so forfeit what it had earned from the 2010 campaign. If there was a fight between TF and bahar over some thing and the licencing thing was a deliberate atttempt to hurt TF by exposing his racing team than Bahar has even less of my respect. |
|
|
21 Nov 2010, 20:59 (Ref:2793951) | #241 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,100
|
What if it was a straight transition to Team Lotus without any of this Group Lotus interference? Supposedly there is some form of historical payments system that makes the fact that supposedly Lotus Racing/Team Lotus have been considered a Cleveland Browns style continuous entity with Team Lotus prior to 1995 a relevant issue for prize money.
|
||
__________________
Marbot : "Ironically, the main difference between a Red Bull and a Virgin is that Red Bull can make parts of its car smaller and floppier." |
21 Nov 2010, 21:02 (Ref:2793953) | #242 | |||
Race Official
20KPINAL
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 23,339
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
"If you're not winning you're not trying." Colin Chapman. |
21 Nov 2010, 21:07 (Ref:2793955) | #243 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,100
|
Teamlotus.net is registered by tucows.com, was created in 1999, updated on the 19th of April and expires in April. TeamLotus.my, however, redirects to LotusRacing.my (bearing in mind some of Tony Fernandes' previous comments, I reckon they will probably go .com rather than .my in future).
|
||
__________________
Marbot : "Ironically, the main difference between a Red Bull and a Virgin is that Red Bull can make parts of its car smaller and floppier." |
21 Nov 2010, 22:07 (Ref:2793988) | #244 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,100
|
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/88452
Mike Gascoyne : "They [Group Lotus] seem to have announced that they're going to join every racing series around the world, and the only question is who's going to pay for it? ... Because they seem to want to do every racing series that there is, and for a loss-making car company, that seems to be slightly perplexing. But if that's what they want to do, good luck to them." Also, http://www.who.is/dns/saveteamlotus.com/ (link from someone on Joe Saward's blog) indicates that the Save Team Lotus site DNS servers are based in Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA. Can't think that any participant would have a particular link to Fort Lauderdale to be honest other than web hosting companies. Teamlotus.com (the one that is being owned, or if David Hunt is legally correct, squatted, by Group Lotus) has the DNS servers in Scottsdale, AZ, USA. Lotusracing.my has been jumping around more than someone who thought that the House of Pain song was a literal instruction. EDIT : In other news, this is what Dani Behr thinks about the new Lotus models having had a whirlwind romance with the cream cakes - according to those stats the New Elise is over 200kg heavier! Last edited by duke_toaster; 21 Nov 2010 at 22:22. |
||
__________________
Marbot : "Ironically, the main difference between a Red Bull and a Virgin is that Red Bull can make parts of its car smaller and floppier." |
21 Nov 2010, 22:48 (Ref:2794005) | #245 | |||
Race Official
20KPINAL
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 23,339
|
Quote:
"What we tried to do with the Lotus brand is to pay our heritage and our past justice. I believe our heritage is all about motor racing. As you could see, this is all about motor racing. We believe that our road car should have a significant connection with the motorsports program. That's why we have also announced recently we will be going and racing in LeMans, GT2, GT4 car racing, obviously IndyCar." The whole interview is here if you want to read, though it does mainly pertain to Lotus's IndyCar involvement: http://www.indycar.com/news/show/55-...ms-with-lotus/ |
|||
__________________
"If you're not winning you're not trying." Colin Chapman. |
22 Nov 2010, 00:16 (Ref:2794023) | #246 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 544
|
LMP, GT2 and GT4 I completely understand as LMP can offer a way of developing technology, GT2 is where all of Lotus's rivals compete and GT4 is for lightly modified track racers, which is (or at least was) very much Lotus's way of doing things. I can also understand sponsoring a team in Indycar and designing an aerokit as it's a good way to appeal to the American market and there is a history of Lotus and Indycar. I can also understand Formula 1 although a) I don't like the way they are trying to bully their way into the name and b it seems very ambitious and will require a lot of money.
What I can't understand is GP2 and GP3. Would anyone decide to buy a Lotus after seeing a few cars in their colours in junior formulae? I also have no idea why they're building an engine for Indycar as they don't build engines for their road cars. Really, All I think Lotus should be doing is Indycar aero and team sponsorship for the American market and GT4 and GT2 as this showcases their models. |
||
__________________
Louise: Is the track Slippery when Wet? DC: I didn't know you were a Bon Jovi fan |
22 Nov 2010, 01:52 (Ref:2794044) | #247 | |||
Race Official
20KPINAL
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 23,339
|
Quote:
As for GP2 and GP3, I wonder if they have a customer car in mind like the 125 'F1' customer car? The Lotus IndyCar engine is a rebadged Cosworth. |
|||
__________________
"If you're not winning you're not trying." Colin Chapman. |
22 Nov 2010, 02:15 (Ref:2794053) | #248 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,216
|
Danny Bahar is going to turn Group Lotus into a huge liability with so many race programs. The group will go bust and then someone friendly to him will pick it up for a few quid.
|
||
|
22 Nov 2010, 08:48 (Ref:2794149) | #249 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,385
|
There is no way this is a realistic engineering or development programme by group lotus. They don't have the money or the resources to support it nor is Lotus profitable enough to sustain that sort of spending. It has to be underwritten by the the parent company (Proton) and they are part owned by the government so ultimately it is taxpayer dollars under writing the whole programme.
Bahar may talk it up but he has to get results and frankly I'll be waiting for him to deliver.... He'll have to or it will be a complete failure and may even force the Group to the wall. |
|
|
22 Nov 2010, 09:31 (Ref:2794163) | #250 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 785
|
The Group Lotus top guys come from Red Bull's and Ferrari-Maserati's race departments; they are used to big programmes that look unlikely to succeed and that's why I don't underestimate what's going on there, whatever it is exactly that explains and backs these projects. I think these guys means business and will achieve a lot things (first in court and then on the racetrack) and that will give us a lot of interesting race programs.
|
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[Team] BBC : Renault lumps for Lotus next year, "Team Lotus" may return | duke_toaster | Formula One | 66 | 17 Sep 2010 20:50 |
Lotus Switxh To Renault Engines | diddy100 | Formula One | 3 | 12 Jul 2010 12:43 |
Team Lotus | Andrew Kitson | Motorsport Art & Photography | 7 | 15 Nov 2004 02:09 |
Team Lotus | angst | Formula One | 8 | 7 Aug 2000 14:35 |
Civil war | ozywoodwards | National & Club Racing | 11 | 3 Aug 2000 09:10 |