|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
31 Dec 2013, 21:23 (Ref:3349321) | #2901 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 409
|
Quote:
The biggest market for exotic cars! And Honda has been trying to expand the brand for a while,Russia and Middle East(Gulf States) is next for Acura. |
||
|
1 Jan 2014, 03:04 (Ref:3349357) | #2902 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 734
|
Hummmm, in fact Acura is pretty close to dead in China with its pricing way above Lexus, Infiniti and even Audi, BMW and Benz, which is ridiculous.
|
||
__________________
Eat, sleep, race, repeat. |
1 Jan 2014, 08:46 (Ref:3349383) | #2903 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,419
|
||
|
3 Jan 2014, 06:02 (Ref:3349903) | #2904 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,214
|
Completely ignoring the questionable usefulness of this testbedding, these are not really even the same organizations/departments. HPD is a subsidiary of American Honda Motor Company and it is in California but the F1 engines are going to come from Japan. Also as general automotive/racing tech companies Wirth and McLaren Group could be direct competitors. This daydream has a bit too much wishful thinking
Last edited by deggis; 3 Jan 2014 at 06:10. |
|
|
3 Jan 2014, 06:44 (Ref:3349912) | #2905 | |
Racer
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 409
|
There was a rumor that Honda has hired Brawn(who told the press he was taking a year vacation from F1) to run the test program of the 2015 Honda F1 engine and then run Mclaren in 2015.The hardest part of the new F1 power-unit isn't the engine(that is the easy part) but everything else(ECU,DI,TURBO,MGU-H,MGU-K,FUEL MILEAGE,WEIGHT AND BALANCE,HEAT Management,COOLING,INTERCOOLING,ELECTRIC MOTORS,BATTERIES,ETC and the PACKAGING).
So the HPD P1 2.2 V6T can be the test bed of that technology with-out breaking F1 rules because it is a different engine.If they do it we should see the car(P1 Coupe) around Le Mans 24hr with them testing by Summer and maybe doing some late WEC races(Japan,China,Gulf State races) for in race development(some things never happen/go wrong during testing). |
|
|
3 Jan 2014, 09:08 (Ref:3349932) | #2906 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,406
|
|||
|
3 Jan 2014, 16:17 (Ref:3350039) | #2907 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 409
|
Quote:
One is 72 degree V angle and the other is 90 degree V angle. One was design to rev to 12,000 rpm and the other to 15,000 rpm(fuel meter to about max 12,000 rpm). But the Indy HR22t will have to be redesigned to race in WEC P1. The only thing thats not going to change is the block, EVERYTHING THING ELSE WITH THE ENGINE WILL BE NEW! It will be closer to its F1 cousin than to the new Indy HR22tt. |
||
|
3 Jan 2014, 19:15 (Ref:3350102) | #2908 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 243
|
|||
|
3 Jan 2014, 19:17 (Ref:3350103) | #2909 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 15,823
|
Yes the list of differences between the engines seems substantial. Not sure what the argument is for saying they are the same
|
||
|
3 Jan 2014, 19:22 (Ref:3350104) | #2910 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,711
|
Honda in DP?
Quote:
http://www.racer.com/imsa-roar-befor...icle/327784/2/ |
|||
__________________
It's great to be here! |
4 Jan 2014, 00:28 (Ref:3350211) | #2911 | |
Racer
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 409
|
The customer program that HPD was trying to sell to P1 teams in 2013 was going to use the HR22t engine with ERS.
1)the ERS was delayed because plans changed(from partial to a full system,kinetic and heat recovery,2wd or 4wd) 2)when there was no buyers,HondaF1 was talking about taking over the program...thats all I can say....sorry. |
|
|
4 Jan 2014, 05:06 (Ref:3350236) | #2912 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,350
|
Thanks for the hints you give. It sounds like there may be something pretty exciting in the pipeline '
|
||
|
4 Jan 2014, 10:38 (Ref:3350282) | #2913 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,222
|
Quote:
Assuming that Honda F1 will take over that program, now make sense why the other F1 manufacturers are not so happy. Honda will be able the test for the F1 program while the others are not allowed. One thing I know, I don´t care the F1 problems, all i want is Honda in P1. Is because of this indecision that Highcroft is so quiet ??... do you have answer for this question |
|||
|
4 Jan 2014, 21:53 (Ref:3350419) | #2914 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 4,755
|
Honda could potentially be able to test sure if what is being said is true but the other manufacturers are going to be able to actually race their engines. I don't see why they should be so sour. Honda is still at a loss as long as they aren't actually in the sport.
|
|
|
7 Jan 2014, 17:53 (Ref:3351306) | #2915 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,203
|
Honda can test its F1 engine in a car (even a 2014 F1 car if they happen to have one) 24/7 every day in 2014 as the are as much an F1 entrant as me and you! It's not 2015 yet. So why test with the irrelevant 2.2l Indycar engine?
|
||
|
10 Jan 2014, 16:38 (Ref:3352484) | #2916 | |
Racer
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 409
|
Wirth is re-working the 2014 HPD P1 Coupe to P2 specs.
HPD is also working on an all new P2 Engine. Look for a announcement this Spring(around 24hrs of Le Mans). The HPD P1 Coupe and Power-Unit is way too expensive for a privateer team to run(if they run it in 2015,it will be factory or team with Honda backing,the chances of this happening goes up with Nissan going LMP1 in 2015) |
|
|
10 Jan 2014, 17:08 (Ref:3352492) | #2917 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,873
|
That's really depressing.
A wheel hasn't turned yet but already, the new regs seem even worse for privateers, if anything. How many more of these P1s are going to turn into P2s? |
||
|
10 Jan 2014, 19:04 (Ref:3352544) | #2918 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 4,755
|
I'm ready for a new HPD P2 engine. They current Oddysey engine isn't as competitive as the nissan-zytek engines.
|
|
|
10 Jan 2014, 19:22 (Ref:3352549) | #2919 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,240
|
New LMP1 regs are dramatically restrictive for privateers. Before 2011, for a private team was enough to buy one or two lola chassis + judd V10 leasing to start a competitive full/partial LMS + LM program. Now privates need to find a chassis manufacturer to build an lmp1, and then need of an engine supplier/tuner to have a motor that respect fuel flow restrictions. Actually is hard to find any real good and serious reason to enter in lmp1 for a private team. I fear that in future LMP1 class will be reserved only for manufacturers work team and LMP2 class will be reserved only for private teams.
|
|
|
10 Jan 2014, 19:33 (Ref:3352553) | #2920 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 409
|
Quote:
Nick Wirth at the Autosport Show. |
||
|
10 Jan 2014, 19:39 (Ref:3352558) | #2921 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 798
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
10 Jan 2014, 21:53 (Ref:3352602) | #2922 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,921
|
I think like you, the ACO should give more rules benefits to private to attract more P1. The privateers LMP1 must be in 800 Kg or 775 kg, to have a chance at competing for overall victories, at least in some WEC circuits with more curves than Le Mans.
|
||
|
10 Jan 2014, 22:00 (Ref:3352606) | #2923 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,208
|
IMHO ACO would never let privateers to go for overall wins aganist the manufacturers. Manufacturers bring a lot of money and media focus to the races.
There is always the threat of a works car disguised as privateer (Dauer Porsche) using the privateer loophole. I would scrap the Silver drivers in the LMP2 for the WEC and Le Mans like in the TUSCC. I understand that Ams have been always there in endurance racing but I don't want to see reserved seats for them. Or drivers with factory support like the Nissan Academy ones acting as Ams. |
||
|
10 Jan 2014, 22:59 (Ref:3352630) | #2924 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 9,011
|
Quote:
|
||
__________________
For when your year runs from June to June - '11/'12/'13/'14/'15/'16/'17/'18/'19/xx/'21/'22/'23 Instagram: rsmotorsportmedia |
10 Jan 2014, 23:46 (Ref:3352648) | #2925 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,208
|
Quote:
If there is a place for privateers is LMP2 and leave LMP1 to factory supported teams. I'm really concerned if privateers will be able to handle all the new LMP1 hybrid technology. |
|||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NASCAR Car of the Future Plans | kingfloopy | NASCAR & Stock Car Racing | 24 | 18 Jan 2006 10:31 |
PI Future plans revealed | inpitlane | Australasian Touring Cars. | 14 | 26 Nov 2005 06:54 |
TC's plans for the future... | retro | Australasian Touring Cars. | 17 | 17 Aug 2004 03:33 |
PG's Plans for Future of OWRS ?!?! | zerO | ChampCar World Series | 19 | 9 Jan 2004 16:30 |
Future Plans | racer69 | Australasian Touring Cars. | 9 | 12 Jun 2001 17:35 |