|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
5 Mar 2010, 23:32 (Ref:2645871) | #426 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,311
|
These are the three guys who's judgement I would trust the most about building a proper IndyCar.
The persentation is a bit underwhelming though, don't you think? Better renderings and more specific detail about engineering and subcontractor sourcing might have been a good idea. As far as timing goes, there didn't seem to be a rush to get this out to the public: a lot of the new chassis debate has tapered off, and releasing this proposal a day or two after the Brazil race would have been just fine. |
||
|
5 Mar 2010, 23:42 (Ref:2645875) | #427 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,965
|
I certainly agree about the presentation, the renderings hardly sell the concept well. I don't find its shape attractive, I must say.
|
||
|
5 Mar 2010, 23:46 (Ref:2645877) | #428 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 809
|
Well that certainly looks the least impressive computer model out of them! Looks quite good, but not as nice as the Lola or Swift, and not as revolutionary as the Delta Wing.
EDIT: Sorry, didn't see the posts above! |
||
|
5 Mar 2010, 23:55 (Ref:2645880) | #429 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,311
|
Glad you pitched in awrb, its good to take the temperature of the room (and the world !) on issues.
I think this general shape, like the Swift #32 or Dallara #3, is where it will shake out in the long run. There is too much concern about safety from the IICS standpoint to allow a fully open wheel design, IMO. |
||
|
6 Mar 2010, 00:34 (Ref:2645893) | #430 | ||
Race Official
20KPINAL
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 23,317
|
I quite like the BAT mobile. It has a great engineering pedigree and as I've said before when it comes to this sort of engineering you can't beat the English. They've been responsible for most of the innovations in race car and engine design. However, there has to be more than one chassis, otherwise it's just another spec series.
|
||
__________________
"If you're not winning you're not trying." Colin Chapman. |
6 Mar 2010, 04:03 (Ref:2645931) | #431 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,885
|
I say there needs to be certain set parameters for things like safety and then let people build what they want. If they want to race tricycles, quad turbos, Lola's, Swift's, BAT's, whatever. Whatever they want. Open the rules all the way and it will turn motorsport on it's head and you'll have so much interest you wouldn't believe.
Instead what will happen at some point in the future, is that there will be another boring press conference, with the same boring people talking, and making the announcement of another boring one make series chassis and engine package. |
|
__________________
Wolverines! |
6 Mar 2010, 06:49 (Ref:2645946) | #432 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,229
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
8 Mar 2010, 08:00 (Ref:2647237) | #433 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,512
|
Quote:
i.e. to make more money isn't it? |
|||
__________________
You got to learn how to fall, before you learn to fly P.Simon |
8 Mar 2010, 09:12 (Ref:2647269) | #434 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,311
|
Come on, climb,
Everyone knows Chip and Roger go IndyCar racing just so they can give young American drivers a shot at the bigtime. Oh, wait a minute.... I gue$$ you're right. |
||
|
9 Mar 2010, 18:50 (Ref:2648414) | #435 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,704
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
Chase the horizon |
19 Mar 2010, 00:03 (Ref:2655256) | #436 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,965
|
The always entertaining Radio Le Mans/Midweek Motorsport crew (hello Sam!) conducted some interesting interviews about the next car:
'Indycar: State of the Series special' includes interviews with Peter McCool (Lola), Ben Bowlby (Delta Wing) and Brendan Kennelly/Chris Norris (Swift) - download podcast from: http://rlm08.0157.org/mwm.php Extended interviews with the above: http://rlm08.0157.org/specials.php I haven't listened to the extended interviews yet, but hearing Peter McCool speaking in the main special I understand Lola's performance matched dual body style a bit better now. He said along the lines of: if there are two engine manufacturers, the different body style could be used to distinguish between them; alternatively if there was still only one engine, different drivers within a team could run with a different body style. Also, I think it was already assumed (and maybe known for sure), but Kennelly & Norris confirmed that Swift's concept is based around their existing Formula Nippon chassis. |
||
|
19 Mar 2010, 00:10 (Ref:2655261) | #437 | ||
Race Official
20KPINAL
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 23,317
|
The latter, 'Swift's concept is based around their existing Formula Nippon chassis' doesn't surprise me. The Lola concept is refreshing.
|
||
__________________
"If you're not winning you're not trying." Colin Chapman. |
22 Mar 2010, 03:37 (Ref:2657596) | #438 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,311
|
I didn't see the TV broadcast myself, and perhaps one of you did and could add some additional detail...
Randy Bernard was on Speed T.V.'s "Wind Tunnel" on Sunday night, and someone wrote that he made a bit of an announcement. Apparently he has decided to name a seven-member panel to write the new vehicle specifications, and Brian Barnhart is not included at the table. This man has been named to chair the group: http://www.af.mil/information/bios/bio.asp?bioID=6229 One of the seven chairs will also be filled by a representative elected by the team owners. This is going to get interesting, and probably drawn out in length? |
||
|
22 Mar 2010, 04:20 (Ref:2657603) | #439 | ||
Race Official
20KPINAL
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 23,317
|
I suppose they would rather have time to consider the situation than make a hasty descision; there's alot riding on this. Fingers crossed and they get it right.
|
||
__________________
"If you're not winning you're not trying." Colin Chapman. |
22 Mar 2010, 05:09 (Ref:2657609) | #440 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,296
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
22 Mar 2010, 05:19 (Ref:2657610) | #441 | |||
Race Official
20KPINAL
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 23,317
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
"If you're not winning you're not trying." Colin Chapman. |
22 Mar 2010, 08:03 (Ref:2657655) | #442 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,311
|
Cheers Canada, thanks for the first hand news. Mr. Bernard is certainly making a good impression so far, and I think he owns some credit for resolving the Comcast issue.
Johnson, I'm guessing you are right and that the May deadline will soon be forgotten. Penske has suggested as much, and Bernard made a comment is an interview the other day that points to the same conclusion. Problem is, that closes the window for new chassis in competition for 2012. And still no word on any interim changes to the current spec. |
||
|
22 Mar 2010, 08:13 (Ref:2657659) | #443 | ||
Race Official
20KPINAL
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 23,317
|
|||
__________________
"If you're not winning you're not trying." Colin Chapman. |
22 Mar 2010, 17:26 (Ref:2657950) | #444 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,296
|
Another step in the right direction:
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/82295 The question for me now is: Now that the owners have a voice will they choose a single make formula or an open one with the lesser teams risking losing out in a development arms race between chassis and engine manufacturers? |
||
|
22 Mar 2010, 18:56 (Ref:2658008) | #445 | ||
Race Official
20KPINAL
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 23,317
|
The easy answer is, "Who knows?", which is a question in itself. The current economic climate would suggest a single chassis and engine. However, it's just under 2 years before the 2012 season and if things pick up, then that gives more room for maneuver.
After what has happened to open wheel racing since 1996, I don't think anyone really wants to see a repeat of that, so they'll look long term and hopefully opt for multiple chassis and engines. I see a third option and that is to start with one chassis, etc. but keep it open so other manufacturers can join later on, similar to when CART opened up the series to chassis and engine designers. |
||
__________________
"If you're not winning you're not trying." Colin Chapman. |
23 Mar 2010, 01:58 (Ref:2658323) | #446 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,296
|
Quote:
The lack of posters in this section is a small indication how many fans still care about this series though. They will come back if there are cars they can be passionate about. I am not saying anything any of us has not said a million times, but I actually am not pessimistic about this series for the first time in a long time and that is a good feeling. Having TG gone has washed away all the bad blood too. |
|||
|
23 Mar 2010, 02:14 (Ref:2658328) | #447 | ||
Race Official
20KPINAL
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 23,317
|
I think what's helped was a successful race at Sao Paulo despite the odds and a rather lack lustre Bahrain GP. It also looks like Randy Bernard seems to be doing a good job, though it's early days yet, but it all adds to a very positive mix. I just hope come July, when they make decision they will have had the time to really think it through.
|
||
__________________
"If you're not winning you're not trying." Colin Chapman. |
23 Mar 2010, 04:49 (Ref:2658359) | #448 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 99
|
IRL committee to advise on new car
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/82295
I'm surprised nobody is talkiing about the interview with the bull rider chief on Speed TV's Wind tunnel show with Robin Miller about a new group to decide the chassis/engine rules |
||
|
23 Mar 2010, 05:19 (Ref:2658367) | #449 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,311
|
Post #438 above and subsequent.
Seating a team owner's representative is a move to satisfy the Delta Wing owners group, who have stated that they expect to have a continuing and powerful voice in the drafting of new regulations. This move helps, but won't be sufficient to produce the level of control they expect. Announcing that neither Brian Barnhart nor Terry Angstadt will have a chair on the board is another political move in the right direction. The question is who the other members will be in addition to General Looney. The only other indications that have been mentioned are that the chassis selection has been pushed back from the most recent promise of May, and that the engine specification is no closer to a resolution. Barnhart previously stated that an early decision was necessary for finalized design, prototyping and testing of a new chassis if it was to be mass produced and raced in 2012. Manufacturers acknowledged that 18 months was a timetable they could work with. An August or September decision...which should enable completion of the Delta Wing prototype...gives me the impression that new chassis will not enter competition until 2013. Indeed, that is what Roger Penske has suggested as a more appropriate timetable. There does not appear to be an engine manufacturer, other than Honda, who is actively involved in discussing the future specification. Lotus/ Cosworth's anounced sponsorship gives rise to hope that they will be involved as an engine supplier, but no signs of that have been reported to my knowledge. So if the new "ICONIC" board is also charged with writing a new engine specification, at least Honda and any other manufacturers will know what is expected of them. Two years of "round table" discussions on the subject of engine specs with any interested manufacturer has produced exactly zero results. And although I continue to raise the issue in front of anyone who won't listen, nobody can build a racecar until they know what the configuration and requirements of the engine are going to be. |
||
|
23 Mar 2010, 06:21 (Ref:2658382) | #450 | ||
Race Official
20KPINAL
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 23,317
|
Quote:
|
||
__________________
"If you're not winning you're not trying." Colin Chapman. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Interesting Controversy in Today's Indy Star | Tim Northcutt | Indycar Series | 21 | 24 Apr 2010 01:17 |
Interesting 2006 Venue News in Indy Star | Tim Northcutt | IRL Indycar Series | 18 | 6 Apr 2005 01:24 |
From Indy Star - Another Bias?? | racinthestreets | ChampCar World Series | 11 | 17 Feb 2004 21:25 |
Interesting item about Franchittii | MolsonBoy | ChampCar World Series | 7 | 17 Aug 2002 10:16 |