Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Saloon & Sportscar Racing > Sportscar & GT Racing

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 17 May 2011, 21:38 (Ref:2881861)   #126
AndrewF31
Veteran
 
AndrewF31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Canada
Spain
Posts: 1,525
AndrewF31 should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridAndrewF31 should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
I was at Portimão the weekend of the race. Love the GT3s. Their sound is lower than the GT1s but not too high for you to understand the differences between the cars.

I was at the VIP Tower at the beginning of the lap and witnessed the almost disaster that envolved the Ferrari and the Mercedes SLS, that went flying into the crash site the lap after the Ferrari stopped on the side of the track. Track workers were preparing to remove the Ferrari when the Mercedes got involved in a tussle with another SLS at the top of the crest and it lost control. A lot of luck meant the SLS inserted itself to the right of the Ferrari, hitting the wall. Thankfully nothing more than a scare for the 2 track workers that ran for their lives when they saw the SLS swerving towards them.
AndrewF31 is offline  
__________________
*jingle* The New York Mets have a new left fielder... Duda, Duda
“It's fine that F1 goes all over the world, but we must not exaggerate by going to race in deserts or where there is no culture for racing," di Montezemolo continued
Quote
Old 17 May 2011, 22:29 (Ref:2881885)   #127
Jameson
Racer
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 233
Jameson should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Racenut View Post
20kg in the Z4 would make a noticeable difference. But if you take away all the GT3 restrictions and added a flat floor, got the aero working, the Z4 is still short on capacity compared to other GT1 cars. It would be competitive at some tracks so it would be interesting to see.
Noticeable? Sure 20kg makes a small difference in lap time but even though the GT1 and GT3 cars might be somewhat close in general, we still speak about a clear performance difference. Other GT3 cars have 25, 50 and even 100kg of ballast, so Z4 is possibly the least penalized car at the moment, hence beating the opponents in the 1st FIA GT3 race.

OK, that's another story, but if you see the qualifying times of Portimao (a circuit where the gaps are famously close comparing to some other circuits) qualifying time of the best Z4 was 4 seconds short of the GT1 pole. I bet 20kg makes 1 tenth, approximately, if you stretch it we might settle in 0,2 seconds but surely not more.

In any case, 1210kg of the Z4 is exactly in the ballpark of all today's GT1 cars (Lambo lightest of all with 1190 and Nissan heaviest of all with 1235kg, ref. FIA website), so if they'd step up to GT1, do not expect to get rid of a lot of weight.

Of course, GT1 might have a bit quicker drivers (although some top GT1 guys like Maxime Martin also race in GT3), the tyres might be a bit quicker (although I believe they are basically the same, just a step softer), carbon brakes, aero, flat floor etc.

However, someone smarter than me has to calculate if all the above easily equalizes to finding that missing 4 seconds. And how much would it cost for a privateer team to upgrade an existing GT3 car to GT1 spec?
Jameson is offline  
Quote
Old 17 May 2011, 23:41 (Ref:2881906)   #128
Racenut
Racer
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Australia
Posts: 280
Racenut should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Ok lets have a more detailed look at what I was talking about with the Z4 and what is required to upgrade it to GT1.

Remove the ballast = 1190kg
Remove the restrictor = 550hp approx
Power to weight = 2.16
Install flat floor
Reduce ride height by 10mm = a lot more downforce
Softer tyres (double the allowance)
Carbon brakes (make a difference in first 10 metres or so) better initial bite

I think all of that would make for a very quick car (probably about 4 seconds).

Nissan power to weight approx 2, which is better than Z4 but nissan has a bigger frontal area which gives more drap. more drag needs more power.

Thats just my observation, I am sure BMW have looked into it, they dont enter any category unless they can win.

BTW I would not call Schubert a privateer team, they have been racing at the top level for a long time. It wouldnt take them much to make the Z4 competitive in GT1.
Racenut is offline  
Quote
Old 18 May 2011, 20:10 (Ref:2882314)   #129
Danny_GT2
Veteran
 
Danny_GT2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Ireland
Lucan, Ireland
Posts: 520
Danny_GT2 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Would be nice to see a Z4 GT1 but it won't happen, mainly because of the fact that having the smaller Z4 more powerful than the bigger GT2 M3 would look ridiculous, unless BMW make a Z4 M with an M3 engine! Also on the subject of BMW in GT1, what happened to the Alpina B6 project or was that just words??
Danny_GT2 is offline  
Quote
Old 30 May 2011, 12:33 (Ref:2888156)   #130
Valker
Veteran
 
Valker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Finland
Tampere, Finland
Posts: 1,208
Valker should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
FIA GT3 race at Smolenskring is cancelled (as well as Formula Surperleague round at the same circuit).
http://openracing.ru/news/4496
Valker is offline  
Quote
Old 30 May 2011, 13:34 (Ref:2888185)   #131
skells22
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,978
skells22 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
any replacement?
skells22 is offline  
Quote
Old 30 May 2011, 16:02 (Ref:2888266)   #132
Marcel ten Caat
Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Netherlands
The Netherlands
Posts: 2,757
Marcel ten Caat should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridMarcel ten Caat should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Mind you that no official statement has come from SRO on this subject yet.

In the meantime the FIA has confirmed 28 cars on the GT3 entry list for Silverstone.
Marcel ten Caat is offline  
Quote
Old 30 May 2011, 19:44 (Ref:2888376)   #133
helgi
Veteran
 
helgi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Russian Federation
Sergiev Posad, Moscow Region, Russian Fe
Posts: 1,546
helgi should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridhelgi should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridhelgi should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Very disappointed.
helgi is offline  
__________________
ACO-Ratel-Lotti group of "entertainpreneurs" soon will make you think that Reverse-Gear-Racing is the most professional series in the world. "Faccio il pane con la farina che ho".
Quote
Old 31 May 2011, 15:49 (Ref:2888814)   #134
Marcel ten Caat
Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Netherlands
The Netherlands
Posts: 2,757
Marcel ten Caat should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridMarcel ten Caat should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Official statement is there and the race is off for 2011.

"We will continue to work to have a race in Russia in the near future, probably in 2012. We will be announcing the alternative venue for Round 5 as soon as we have finalised everything with the new circuit." - Stephane Ratel
Marcel ten Caat is offline  
Quote
Old 31 May 2011, 17:30 (Ref:2888883)   #135
AndrewF31
Veteran
 
AndrewF31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Canada
Spain
Posts: 1,525
AndrewF31 should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridAndrewF31 should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Too ambitious and costly to haul the cars all the way to Russia?
AndrewF31 is offline  
__________________
*jingle* The New York Mets have a new left fielder... Duda, Duda
“It's fine that F1 goes all over the world, but we must not exaggerate by going to race in deserts or where there is no culture for racing," di Montezemolo continued
Quote
Old 31 May 2011, 17:56 (Ref:2888901)   #136
helgi
Veteran
 
helgi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Russian Federation
Sergiev Posad, Moscow Region, Russian Fe
Posts: 1,546
helgi should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridhelgi should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridhelgi should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
A local sponsor pulled out suddenly. Freacking ridiculous (c)
helgi is offline  
__________________
ACO-Ratel-Lotti group of "entertainpreneurs" soon will make you think that Reverse-Gear-Racing is the most professional series in the world. "Faccio il pane con la farina che ho".
Quote
Old 22 Jul 2011, 03:29 (Ref:2929667)   #137
Purist
Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
United States
Wichita, Kansas, USA
Posts: 5,892
Purist is going for a new world record!Purist is going for a new world record!Purist is going for a new world record!Purist is going for a new world record!Purist is going for a new world record!Purist is going for a new world record!
The replacement is the Slovakia Ring, and it seems they will be using the full ~6km layout. I have to say that this track might well be an improvement over the Smolensk Ring. It's not so tight and confined, and has multiple straights of enough length to give some real overtaking potential. Slovakia even has a some elevation changes, which is always nice.
Purist is offline  
__________________
The only certainty is that nothing is certain.
Quote
Old 28 Aug 2011, 23:34 (Ref:2947392)   #138
Deleted
Registered User
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 10,744
Deleted will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameDeleted will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameDeleted will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameDeleted will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameDeleted will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameDeleted will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameDeleted will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameDeleted will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameDeleted will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Fame
I thought GT3E and ADAC GT Masters were running with the same BoP, but apparently not

BMW Z4
FIA GT3: 1x85mm / 1245kg (1210kg at the start of the season)
ADAC: 1x85mm / 1225kg

Corvette Z06 GT3
FIA GT3: 1x49mm / 1350kg
ADAC: 1x49mm / 1280kg (1330kg at the start of the season)

Too bored to list the others but no wonder Callaway quit FIAsco GT3, obviously it's still not fair with that ridiculous restrictor but at least the weight is more tolerable
Deleted is offline  
Quote
Old 29 Aug 2011, 04:08 (Ref:2947435)   #139
Nick6
Racer
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
United States
Posts: 409
Nick6 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I know I have said this before but BOP is a disaster!
Nick6 is offline  
Quote
Old 29 Aug 2011, 09:49 (Ref:2947559)   #140
Jameson
Racer
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 233
Jameson should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chiana View Post
I thought GT3E and ADAC GT Masters were running with the same BoP, but apparently not

BMW Z4
FIA GT3: 1x85mm / 1245kg (1210kg at the start of the season)
ADAC: 1x85mm / 1225kg

Corvette Z06 GT3
FIA GT3: 1x49mm / 1350kg
ADAC: 1x49mm / 1280kg (1330kg at the start of the season)

Too bored to list the others but no wonder Callaway quit FIAsco GT3, obviously it's still not fair with that ridiculous restrictor but at least the weight is more tolerable
I think there are 2 main BoPs: one for the FIA GT3 (sprint races, softer tyres) and one for the Blancpain Endurance Series (endurance races, harder tyres).

I don't know how all the national championships are doing it (ADAC, FFSA, UK sprint races, Belcar longer races), but they all do use the same tyre as Blancpain so it would make sense to follow that instead of the FIA one, if they are allowed, that is..

Personally, I think that the FIA GT3 BoP has been a disaster and in Blancpain + national series, it's fairly good. I'm sure there are lots of people disagreeing...

As for the Corvette, I think it's not fair it has been killed like that in FIA GT3. On the other hand, it was far too fast in most parts of 2010 and therefore got the title with a too easy BoP and now pays for it with a one that is too strict.
Jameson is offline  
Quote
Old 29 Aug 2011, 09:51 (Ref:2947560)   #141
Jameson
Racer
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 233
Jameson should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick6 View Post
I know I have said this before but BOP is a disaster!
It is, very much so. But without it, these championships would not exist and the GT3 concept would not be this popular. So, our choice is not to have GT3 or live with the BoP.

Personally, I just hope that they'd make the BoP in a better way. After all, it works fairly well in ALMS/LMS, GT1 etc.
Jameson is offline  
Quote
Old 29 Aug 2011, 11:57 (Ref:2947602)   #142
Deleted
Registered User
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 10,744
Deleted will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameDeleted will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameDeleted will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameDeleted will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameDeleted will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameDeleted will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameDeleted will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameDeleted will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameDeleted will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Fame
The one and only reason that kept Callaway in the hunt for drivers trophy (not teams) last year was the fact that the line-up of the lead car was superior. FIA started raping them harder after Brno and by september they were the heaviest car (loaded with succcess ballast and 80kg BoP weight, reduced from July's 100kg) with easily the smallest restrictor on the field. So no, they didn't get that title "with too easy" BoP

Z4 on the other hand will

Last edited by Deleted; 29 Aug 2011 at 12:04.
Deleted is offline  
Quote
Old 29 Aug 2011, 12:55 (Ref:2947633)   #143
Nick6
Racer
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
United States
Posts: 409
Nick6 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jameson View Post
It is, very much so. But without it, these championships would not exist and the GT3 concept would not be this popular. So, our choice is not to have GT3 or live with the BoP.

Personally, I just hope that they'd make the BoP in a better way. After all, it works fairly well in ALMS/LMS, GT1 etc.
I like the class, the problem I find is GT3 is a very expensive "flavor of the day" type of class. The car to have 2 seasons ago is no longer competitive and not to mention that in a mere 5 years European GT3 has lost Maserati, Lotus (might join again?), Ascari, Morgan, Alpina, Chrysler, and now Corvette.

Remember the GT3 "concept" when it first started the standard Porsche cup car was the base platform?
Nick6 is offline  
Quote
Old 30 Aug 2011, 06:29 (Ref:2948115)   #144
pez
Rookie
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 24
pez should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
agreed 2 things need to change soon...

1) GT3 cars should be contained at current speeds. I believe the GT3 cars of today are some 6 secs a lap faster at somewhere like SPA than GT3 in its inaugural year

2) Costs.The newest GT3 cars cost Euro 300k ++++ and that is just the base car. Add a couple of options and a base spares package and you're looking closer to 450K.... This is just insane !

I think GT3 has moved to GT2 territory i.e far from its initial purpose
"The FIA GT3 European Championship was launched in 2006 as a way to expand manufacturer involvement in motorsports as well as to help amateur drivers across Europe."

so what replaces GT3 as the supposed entry? GT4? it could do but there seems to be little focus on this level certainly from the SRO.
pez is offline  
Quote
Old 30 Aug 2011, 08:48 (Ref:2948174)   #145
Jameson
Racer
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 233
Jameson should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by pez View Post
agreed 2 things need to change soon...

1) GT3 cars should be contained at current speeds. I believe the GT3 cars of today are some 6 secs a lap faster at somewhere like SPA than GT3 in its inaugural year

2) Costs.The newest GT3 cars cost Euro 300k ++++ and that is just the base car. Add a couple of options and a base spares package and you're looking closer to 450K.... This is just insane !

I think GT3 has moved to GT2 territory i.e far from its initial purpose
"The FIA GT3 European Championship was launched in 2006 as a way to expand manufacturer involvement in motorsports as well as to help amateur drivers across Europe."

so what replaces GT3 as the supposed entry? GT4? it could do but there seems to be little focus on this level certainly from the SRO.
I agree with everything you say.

The 1st round of GT3 cars cost something like €100-150.000. Already the 2nd year (2007?) Matech's Ford GT among some others was costing €300.000 and that remained the basic/max price of all cars for the next couple of years. Now, the new ones go for around €400.000. Why has this been allowed? I thought there used to be a maximum price set by the rules, €260.000 or around that, at the time when Audi brought the R8 in the picture.

GT3 is cool because of the variety of cars. However, it needs stricter technical rules to keep the development in some control. Maybe a standard ECU? Any other ideas?

Also, the manufacturers are basically allowed to do anything they want, so some of them have opted to develop a superior car and then hope not to be hit too hard with the BoP. This is the expensive way.

The fact that the cars are now several seconds per lap quicker than a few years ago is bringing no advantage to anyone. Just costing more.

I've heard that the budgets the team's ask for FIA GT3 season have in worst cases reached and exceeded €400.000. If you are a gentleman driver who have to cover it all because the "pro" or "gold" you want to race with has no money, it's just crazy for a championship like that. They could probably do ILMC in an LMP car, including Le Mans, with that kind of money.

So, why would they stay in a championship where they can choose whatever car but have to wait until the 1st race to know if BoP is on their side or against and effectively drive either a competitive car or not. Also, if you are a gentleman driver, you anyway don't have a chance to win in FIA GT3, because every year the races and title are won by Silver-Silver pairings, which is another big problem of this championship.

In short, I think BoP is necessary and those driver categorizations (pro-am) is a good idea, but if they are done the way it's done now, it just doesn't work.
Jameson is offline  
Quote
Old 30 Aug 2011, 10:14 (Ref:2948217)   #146
TheNewBob
Veteran
 
TheNewBob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
England
Lincs, UK
Posts: 2,555
TheNewBob should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridTheNewBob should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick6 View Post
I like the class, the problem I find is GT3 is a very expensive "flavor of the day" type of class. The car to have 2 seasons ago is no longer competitive and not to mention that in a mere 5 years European GT3 has lost Maserati, Lotus (might join again?), Ascari, Morgan, Alpina, Chrysler, and now Corvette.

Remember the GT3 "concept" when it first started the standard Porsche cup car was the base platform?
I was hoping that some of these 'lost' cars would surface again in the Blancpain series, at least a couple of Vipers, Corvettes and Alpinas. I guess they're just limited to the Dutch Supercar Challenge now.
TheNewBob is offline  
Quote
Old 30 Aug 2011, 10:53 (Ref:2948230)   #147
Speed-King
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location:
Wuerzburg,Germany
Posts: 7,326
Speed-King has a real shot at the podium!Speed-King has a real shot at the podium!Speed-King has a real shot at the podium!Speed-King has a real shot at the podium!
The Alpinas are actually super-competitive this year in ADAC GT-Masters...
Speed-King is offline  
Quote
Old 30 Aug 2011, 20:57 (Ref:2948577)   #148
Speed-King
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location:
Wuerzburg,Germany
Posts: 7,326
Speed-King has a real shot at the podium!Speed-King has a real shot at the podium!Speed-King has a real shot at the podium!Speed-King has a real shot at the podium!
Quote:
The 1st round of GT3 cars cost something like €100-150.000. Already the 2nd year (2007?) Matech's Ford GT among some others was costing €300.000 and that remained the basic/max price of all cars for the next couple of years. Now, the new ones go for around €400.000. Why has this been allowed? I thought there used to be a maximum price set by the rules, €260.000 or around that, at the time when Audi brought the R8 in the picture.
Another kind of random thought: There's an upside to the evolution of GT3 - could anyone see the GT3 cars of 2006 becoming an international top-class?

Imagine GT1 dying and being replaced by Cup-Porsches!
Speed-King is offline  
Quote
Old 31 Aug 2011, 06:45 (Ref:2948708)   #149
lms
Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 750
lms should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Speed-King View Post

Imagine GT1 dying and being replaced by Cup-Porsches!
now that's a disturbing thought
lms is offline  
Quote
Old 3 Sep 2011, 06:04 (Ref:2950226)   #150
rich07
Veteran
 
rich07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Australia
Victoria
Posts: 8,611
rich07 has a real shot at the podium!rich07 has a real shot at the podium!rich07 has a real shot at the podium!rich07 has a real shot at the podium!rich07 has a real shot at the podium!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Speed-King View Post
Imagine GT1 dying and being replaced by Cup-Porsches!
I had some wisdom teeth removed a couple of days ago and Im in enough pain atm without thinking of that thanks
rich07 is offline  
__________________
Somebody asked if the McLaren F1 was going to be like the Ferrari F40, Gordon Murray replied, "I don't think so, there's no one at McLaren who can weld that badly."
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Super Taikyu Series ST-X Class (GT3 Japan) 2011 Race Calander Monkey Head Sportscar & GT Racing 30 21 Dec 2011 10:01
[FIA GT] GT3 American Championship proposed I Rosputnik Sportscar & GT Racing 27 10 Dec 2010 22:03
[FIA GT] FIA GT3 Championship 2008 Sportscarguy08 Sportscar & GT Racing 2 15 Jan 2008 23:09
[FIA GT] FIA GT3 Championship New Jaguar photos Revealed thebullet Sportscar & GT Racing 7 25 Jan 2007 16:50
European Championship Rd 1 Gasman17 Kart Racing 4 29 May 2002 14:31


All times are GMT. The time now is 14:39.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.