|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
15 Nov 2011, 22:52 (Ref:2986979) | #126 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,958
|
This car is basically the Pratt & Miller design for the LMP-EVO category, designed in 2008, for introduction in 2010, before the ACO changed their minds.
From most angles, it is a decent looking car. It does appear to have a sizeable aero advantage over current cars, and will be very hard to equalize, particularly at races like Daytona. But I am just a casual observer, and you`d be best to wait on an educated opinion from Fuller on this. |
||
|
15 Nov 2011, 23:11 (Ref:2986990) | #127 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,958
|
|||
|
15 Nov 2011, 23:25 (Ref:2987000) | #128 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 932
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
|
15 Nov 2011, 23:28 (Ref:2987004) | #129 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,958
|
Just a correction on my post above... that isn't a clay model, it is a fully functioning wind tunnel model I'm told, that saw time in the wind tunnels.
Last edited by Fogelhund; 15 Nov 2011 at 23:35. |
||
|
15 Nov 2011, 23:40 (Ref:2987008) | #130 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 7,175
|
That is absolutely GORGEOUS.
|
||
|
15 Nov 2011, 23:50 (Ref:2987009) | #131 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,419
|
^Comparitively speaking? I think the carbon fiber model is gorgeous but not so much the Vette dp3. Looks better than the current DP's though.
|
|
|
15 Nov 2011, 23:56 (Ref:2987011) | #132 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,958
|
Quote:
It's the same basic design. What's the difference? One was going to race at LM, and was therefore gorgeous, and the other in Grand Am so ugly? |
|||
|
16 Nov 2011, 00:49 (Ref:2987027) | #133 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,025
|
Quote:
Chris |
|||
__________________
Member: Ecurie Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch. EFR & Greg Pickett fan. |
16 Nov 2011, 01:44 (Ref:2987043) | #134 | |||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 15,829
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
16 Nov 2011, 03:33 (Ref:2987078) | #135 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,203
|
Look at the greenhouse for starters, it's taller and the side windows are much more vertical (this feature always made DP cars look like tanks to me). The rear fenders are completely different too. The DP car is not as curvy. It's basically GTP vs. DP
|
||
|
16 Nov 2011, 03:50 (Ref:2987084) | #136 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,958
|
In my opinion, some people made their mind up knowing that it was for Grand Am, and a tube framer. Had the same design been a carbon fibre chassis, for LM, people would be saying how great it looks. It's just that kind of world.
|
||
|
16 Nov 2011, 05:00 (Ref:2987090) | #137 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,767
|
Exactly. If this were a venture by anyone else, and had Team Corvette working on a car for it, it would be hailed as a serious challenger to the ALMS.
|
|
|
16 Nov 2011, 05:56 (Ref:2987094) | #138 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,419
|
I actually like Grand Am, so before you think the reason for my opinions is that you're wrong. It does look SOMEWHAT like the carbon model, but only in shape. The model is lower, looks wider, more complex and something that should be running at the front of the field at LaSarthe. The new Vette DP looks good, but not nearly like the model would look like if it were the real deal.
|
|
|
16 Nov 2011, 12:27 (Ref:2987198) | #139 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 312
|
Like it or not, this car is a step in the right direction, even if it's just asthetics for the most part. GA is actively trying to attact prospects, whereas our beloved ALMS just relys on the well oiled machine (ha!). ALMS needs to react to the slap in the face it just got (PLM exclusion) and show the series is a real player in today's sport car world. Complacency is a death wish.
|
||
|
16 Nov 2011, 14:27 (Ref:2987236) | #140 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 15,829
|
Exactly, GA took a big step forward with the DPG3 regs. One of the big complaints about DP's was that they were ugly, GM has certainly turned that perception around for many of us. For me, aesthetics were only one issue with the DP's, now that they look better we can focus on the other deficiencies!
|
||
|
16 Nov 2011, 17:35 (Ref:2987317) | #141 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 7,175
|
Makes me wish GM Goodwrench was still around...just to get the old Corvette GTP livery back on.
|
||
|
16 Nov 2011, 17:39 (Ref:2987320) | #142 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,025
|
Quote:
Chris |
|||
__________________
Member: Ecurie Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch. EFR & Greg Pickett fan. |
16 Nov 2011, 18:08 (Ref:2987331) | #143 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 824
|
The Corvette DP doesn't look bad. It's definitely in the right direction, and it almost looks like and late 90's GT1 car. Here's hoping for a Ford GT or BMW M6 bodywork.
|
||
|
16 Nov 2011, 19:41 (Ref:2987384) | #144 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,419
|
I'd think they'd go Mustang bodywork, but the 6 series would work for Ganassi, but think about it... BMW has the M3DTM- they're just as fast as DP's. I think the future may lead to those types of cars? I'd go that route and help link up GA with DTM and SuperGT. Just what I think though.
|
|
|
16 Nov 2011, 20:24 (Ref:2987399) | #145 | ||||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,025
|
Quote:
Quote:
Chris |
||||
__________________
Member: Ecurie Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch. EFR & Greg Pickett fan. |
17 Nov 2011, 01:17 (Ref:2987483) | #146 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,326
|
John Dagys on Twitter:
Quote:
1 Shank 2 Ganassi 1 ??? Starworks would be a logical choice with Bill Riley being their engineer, but then why just one car? OTOH, I've been reading some forum rumors about Ganassi building their own BMW-inspired bodywork, so Ganassi might not be among the four generic Riley-teams, so maybe it's more like 1 Shank 2 Starworks 1 ??? (is the Pickett thing still on?) with a total of 11 DPG3 cars... Either way, looking forward to John's article. |
|||
|
17 Nov 2011, 01:52 (Ref:2987492) | #147 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 15,829
|
I interpreted those numbers to be for Daytona only, so maybe some won't run whole season, or maybe some chassis won't be ready in time?
|
||
|
17 Nov 2011, 01:58 (Ref:2987495) | #148 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 932
|
Don't recall if this has been voiced quite this explicitly, but I'd expect the "generic" Riley bodywork to have some advantage over the Corvette DP, being unmolested by styling cues, although more money may have been thrown at the Corvette and the rules engineered such that styling cues are not an insurmountable disadvantage.
|
|
|
17 Nov 2011, 02:21 (Ref:2987501) | #149 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,326
|
Quote:
Worst Case: 1 Ganassi BMW-Riley 2 Starworks Ford Riley 1 Shank Ford Riley 1 Wayne Taylor Corvette 1 GAINSCO Corvette 2 AEX Corvette 1 SoD Corvette Possible Additions: 1 Doran Dallara 3rd Starworks Ford Riley 2nd Shank Ford Riley 1 ??? One-offs for Daytona/NAEC (various degrees of certainty): 2nd Ganassi 1 Predator BMW Riley 1 Krohn Lola 1 Pickett Riley 1 SoD Coyote (team had an old style car at the test today) It's not great, but GT should be a barn burner with 20+ cars for the season and the new cars in DP should help with the excitement there... |
|||
|
17 Nov 2011, 13:16 (Ref:2987718) | #150 | |||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 15,829
|
Quote:
Any word on a team running an R8 for Daytona or later? |
|||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Delta Wing Discussion ONLY | Holt | Sportscar & GT Racing | 2948 | 19 Mar 2017 23:51 |
[ELMS] ELMS (was LMS) 2012 discussion | Bentley03 | ACO Regulated Series | 826 | 21 Oct 2012 15:50 |
ALMS 2012 Discussion | joeb | North American Racing | 2895 | 2 Oct 2012 22:16 |
ILMC 2012 discussion | Bentley03 | ACO Regulated Series | 51 | 3 Jun 2011 20:15 |