|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
30 Jul 2003, 21:13 (Ref:675738) | #151 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 795
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
"Why should I go living in old peoples home?" "Cos I wanna put a snooker table in your bedroom and the kids are frightened of you mustache" |
30 Jul 2003, 21:39 (Ref:675767) | #152 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 96
|
Can someone confirm that the trees around Brands cannot be cut down to extend the circuit? But they can be chopped to build houses. How does that compute?
|
||
__________________
To finish first. First you must finish. ace-motorsport. |
31 Jul 2003, 02:59 (Ref:675924) | #153 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 14
|
Craig, thanks for the links. Sorry to make you search for them, I thought you had them to hand. I have to say, whether Brands survives or not may be a moot point. With all the congestion that is bound to accompany the building of 130'000 homes, no one will be able to get to Brands Hatch anyway! As far as building in the "south" midlands goes, the M1 is already a car park from Luton to the M25 during rush hour(s). I am truly saddened by all of this news. As I say, I seen the blight first hand, and Kent will always be 'home'.
Is there anyone who knows Brands' status re: brownfields, etc. Also what is the tax situation for the circuit. Surely a tax exemption would go a long way to making the circuit viable as a going concern. Perhaps the only bright spot in this is that John Prescott is (I believe) a member of the board at BAR and so perhaps has a soft spot for the sport (or am I being naive?). |
||
|
31 Jul 2003, 04:41 (Ref:675950) | #154 | |
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: May 1998
Posts: 10,993
|
Hate to say it but I think you're being naive.
|
|
|
31 Jul 2003, 06:19 (Ref:675962) | #155 | |||
Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 14
|
Quote:
Yeah, thought I probably was. |
|||
|
31 Jul 2003, 06:20 (Ref:675964) | #156 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,348
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
Do it in the streets! |
31 Jul 2003, 15:12 (Ref:676379) | #157 | |
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: May 1998
Posts: 10,993
|
Given the goverment are behind, at least they've put their 'full support' behind, these plans I don't expect a few old trees would be reason to stop development of the site if it were to fall into the hands of Barretts or Persimmons.
|
|
|
31 Jul 2003, 15:50 (Ref:676414) | #158 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 3,664
|
The trees would probably be a bonus to a housebuilder, they would probably add value to a nice exclusive estate.
|
|
|
31 Jul 2003, 16:41 (Ref:676450) | #159 | |||
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,840
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
31 Jul 2003, 17:54 (Ref:676502) | #160 | |||
Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 14
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
1 Aug 2003, 06:47 (Ref:676839) | #161 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 13,038
|
In fact it was John Prescott who insisted on the public enquiry when Brands wanted to alter the track to host the British GP, so it may come back to blow up in his face!
|
||
__________________
The Priest Catcher Honoured recipient of the BARC Browning Medal |
1 Aug 2003, 06:50 (Ref:676842) | #162 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,189
|
yeah but you're forgetting that these f*****s are made of Teflon
|
||
__________________
"we love the winter, it brings us closer together" |
1 Aug 2003, 10:22 (Ref:677004) | #163 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 582
|
Snett is flat but it presents an awesome challenge to race on....Very, very fast, heavy braking and a couple of buttock clenching corners each lap - Great for driving tho fairly **** for spectating
|
||
|
1 Aug 2003, 10:24 (Ref:677007) | #164 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,189
|
I suppose that's a whole other debate...just who is motor racing supposed to be for...drivers or spectators?
I'm not going to go there though |
||
__________________
"we love the winter, it brings us closer together" |
5 Aug 2003, 10:36 (Ref:680348) | #165 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,223
|
Brands & co saved?
http://www.grandprix.com/ns/ns11609.html
Quote:
|
||
|
5 Aug 2003, 11:16 (Ref:680383) | #166 | |
Racer
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 290
|
This one sounds like it might make sense, but it only seems to cover Brands Hatch circut, not all the BHLG circuts
|
|
__________________
Help! Anything above is my own opinion as a private individual, not linked in any way to anything else I may be involved with. |
5 Aug 2003, 11:26 (Ref:680390) | #167 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 228
|
50m would be a good price as I reckon 70m is way overpriced. Hope it happens as we need to keep the four tracks intact.
With any luck they will have seen the various threads on here and use them as inspiration. There is so much more that could be made from the tracks without ripping off the racers and spectators alike. Logical thinking rather than blinkered bulldozing is required ) |
||
|
5 Aug 2003, 16:10 (Ref:680600) | #168 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: May 1998
Posts: 10,993
|
PP, read again:
Quote:
|
||
|
5 Aug 2003, 16:21 (Ref:680608) | #169 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,441
|
Lets hope this goes through...keep them all together.
Will that include silverstone because that wasn't on the original list that was up for sale?! |
||
__________________
"Miss Stroplash" - The Hooker - BGP 2009 |
5 Aug 2003, 16:28 (Ref:680615) | #170 | |
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: May 1998
Posts: 10,993
|
Silverstone is not for sale - it's owned by the BRDC. The Silverstone lease might be available seperately though. However I hope that this circuit is seperated from the other four as it does tend to suck in all the funds that would otherwise be spent on the others...
|
|
|
5 Aug 2003, 17:25 (Ref:680656) | #171 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 3,664
|
Quote:
Last edited by Piglet; 5 Aug 2003 at 17:27. |
||
|
5 Aug 2003, 18:28 (Ref:680700) | #172 | |
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: May 1998
Posts: 10,993
|
You may, of course, be correct on that Piglet but, if the agents are attempting to maximise return on the sale I'd have thought they'd be marketing the lease as a seperate sale. I mean what use would that be to Bovis or Persimmon?
|
|
|
5 Aug 2003, 18:38 (Ref:680708) | #173 | ||
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,840
|
Persimmon? You mean the sponsors of our favourite touring car team last year Craig!
|
||
|
5 Aug 2003, 18:43 (Ref:680713) | #174 | |
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: May 1998
Posts: 10,993
|
hmmm... no comment on that!
|
|
|
5 Aug 2003, 18:43 (Ref:680714) | #175 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 3,664
|
My thought process is that there is not much point in owning the rights to run a grand prix (that also REQUIRES you to run a grand prix) if you don't have a circuit to run it on (I think BHL found that out!). Or in buying a lease to Silverstone that requires you to invest massively without having the payback of the GP.
I think whatever happens with the rest of the circuits the lease and the rights will be marketed together. Perhaps this makes your wish that the rest of the circuits will be sold separately to any GP/Silverstone deal more likely which might prevent the black hole scenario that you referred to before. |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Octagon is no longer Octagon... | Chris Y | Trackside | 2 | 18 Apr 2003 10:42 |
Octagon | Mark Mitchell | Marshals Forum | 30 | 21 Feb 2003 20:46 |
Octagon Screw up again. | Sim_Da_BTCC_Man | Trackside | 7 | 2 Feb 2003 22:06 |
Octagon ( good or bad ) ?? | SILVERS95 | National & Club Racing | 52 | 19 Apr 2002 09:34 |
octagon | SPOONERBORO | Trackside | 14 | 8 Mar 2002 18:58 |