|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
21 May 2009, 00:29 (Ref:2466110) | #76 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,919
|
Quote:
L.P. |
|||
__________________
Probae esti in segetem sunt deteriorem datae fruges, tamen ipsae suaptae enitent |
21 May 2009, 08:32 (Ref:2466233) | #78 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 368
|
New Autosport Story:
Ecclestone worried Ferrari may leave F1 http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/75461 |
||
|
21 May 2009, 12:28 (Ref:2466386) | #79 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,209
|
Autosport's "version" reflects better what Raikkonen said at Ferrari.com, also Autosport wrote exact same line (with "not" word) on shorter version of that interview. Without "not", it would be extremely weird comment, from Raikkonen especially...
|
|
|
21 May 2009, 14:03 (Ref:2466460) | #80 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 22
|
coming from another Fin, that is a really helpful insight.
|
|
|
24 May 2009, 00:07 (Ref:2467915) | #81 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,630
|
Maybe if Kimi wins Monaco tomorrow they will stop whining and play nice.
DK |
||
|
24 May 2009, 00:59 (Ref:2467927) | #82 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,873
|
|||
|
26 May 2009, 00:40 (Ref:2469176) | #83 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,630
|
Quote:
DK |
|||
|
26 May 2009, 14:30 (Ref:2469531) | #84 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 122
|
Ferrari needs to compete aginst other manufacurers and it needs to be more than just an engine supplier. It said it needs to be in a series where it can race its own engines and cars against other manufacturers. Not just providing for customers in a spec series.
|
||
|
26 May 2009, 14:45 (Ref:2469543) | #85 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,306
|
IRL is not a de jure user of a single engine supplier, but rather is de facto.
|
|
|
26 May 2009, 15:04 (Ref:2469550) | #86 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 122
|
|||
|
26 May 2009, 15:52 (Ref:2469578) | #87 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,348
|
||
|
26 May 2009, 16:04 (Ref:2469586) | #88 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 122
|
|||
|
26 May 2009, 21:12 (Ref:2469803) | #89 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,735
|
|||
|
27 May 2009, 23:32 (Ref:2470605) | #90 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,306
|
de jure = by law (or rule)
de facto = in (or by) fact, without sanction of law (or rule) Common terms, easily found. (Google - or an education - is your friend.) |
|
|
28 May 2009, 00:10 (Ref:2470618) | #91 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 984
|
|||
|
28 May 2009, 14:51 (Ref:2470964) | #92 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 429
|
Ferrari engineers are studying the ACO regulations:
http://translate.google.com/translat...istory_state0= Google translation: Quote:
|
||
|
28 May 2009, 16:58 (Ref:2471027) | #93 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,958
|
|||
|
28 May 2009, 17:03 (Ref:2471031) | #94 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,347
|
Ferrari and its brand almost uniquely seem to have little problem attracting sponsorship money and therefore with the cost reductions happening in F1 maybe they feel they will have the funding and resources to do this.
My other theory is that a works assault on Le Mans would also enable some backdoor testing of components for F1 with the continuing restriction on testing and budget. Either way if Ferrari do LeMans its mainstream media profile will increase immensly and I would expect other manufacturers to follow - maybe also for backdoor testing as well. |
||
|
28 May 2009, 17:47 (Ref:2471062) | #95 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 22
|
Quote:
Thats a great idea. |
||
|
28 May 2009, 18:09 (Ref:2471078) | #96 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 161
|
Ferrari back at Le Mans - YES!
Who cares about F1? |
||
|
28 May 2009, 18:43 (Ref:2471097) | #97 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,054
|
In 80s Ferrari menaced FIA to leave formula 1. To make this menace strong, Enzo Ferrari gave to his engineers the order to build a car to race in Indy league. It was a bluff, so I think in these days we are watching a fiction. Ferrari is trying to make under pressure FIA to find an accord.
You can be sure, you'll never see Ferrari in Le Mans in the next years. If they would come to Sarthe, they would partecipate first with a customer project (like the Aston) and then with a factory car. It should be very hard for Ferrari to beat Audi and Peugeot in a so competitive class like LMP1. I don't think Ferrari would like to be beaten by Audi and Peugeot diesel cars... It would be a very humiliation for Ferrari. They are only playing this game to beat Mosley... |
||
__________________
Le Mans, 23/06/2013, 15:00, Allan we miss you! Porsche 1°-2° in GTE-Pro class with 991 GT3 RSR Porsche 1st. place in GTE-Am class with 997 GT3 RSR |
28 May 2009, 18:48 (Ref:2471101) | #98 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 6,654
|
Quote:
http://eurosport.yahoo.com/28052009/...ompromise.html |
|||
__________________
Hvil i Fred Allan. (Rest in Peace Allan) |
28 May 2009, 19:06 (Ref:2471109) | #99 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,525
|
Max's quote at the end is questionable IMO: I think Ferrari is more important to Formula 1 than the other way around.
I'm sure that a move of Ferrari to sportscar racing would pull others with them and push this racing up the ladder. |
||
|
28 May 2009, 20:00 (Ref:2471135) | #100 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,351
|
Quote:
The question would be if Ferrrari has balls to stick with it and truly tell Ecclestone to stick it where the sun never shines. |
|||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Porsche in LMP1!? | Dario911 | Sportscar & GT Racing | 460 | 23 Jan 2011 10:42 |
McLaren to LMP1/2? | slicktoast | Formula One | 23 | 14 Apr 2009 23:48 |
[LM24] F1 vs LMP1 | the menace | 24 Heures du Mans | 24 | 19 Dec 2008 21:44 |
Corse Clienti Ferrari LMP1 | JAG | Sportscar & GT Racing | 33 | 16 Feb 2004 16:49 |
Lmp1 | Edmonton | Sportscar & GT Racing | 4 | 3 Feb 2004 08:35 |