Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Single Seater Racing > Formula One

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12 Jul 2002, 18:53 (Ref:332872)   #1
freud
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location:
Planet Earth
Posts: 2,156
freud has a lot of promise if they can keep it on the circuit!
Costs in F1

I have a few questions with regards to costs in formula one. I will be thankful if those who know about these issues can share their opinion.

Q-1. What is the minimum cost required to make a f1 car (including assembly & parts)?

Q-2. What is the cost of F 2002 (Ferrari)? Is it the most expensive car on grid? If so how much more than, say a Williams or Mclaren?

Q-3. What is the minimum cost required to start a f1 GP team?

Q-4. What is the most expensive single component on f1 car?

Q-5. How much an f1 engine cost?

Q-6. How much the F1 tyre cost? (cost of one tyre and costs of all tyres for a GP weekend) Is their a difference in price between Bridgestone and Michelin? How do the teams negotiate with the tyre manufacturers?

Last edited by freud; 12 Jul 2002 at 18:53.
freud is offline  
Quote
Old 13 Jul 2002, 00:32 (Ref:333014)   #2
f1manoz
Veteran
 
f1manoz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Australia
Lincolnshire, UK
Posts: 7,294
f1manoz should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridf1manoz should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridf1manoz should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
TOO BLOODY MUCH!!!!
f1manoz is offline  
__________________
Sunderland Til I Die!
Quote
Old 13 Jul 2002, 00:39 (Ref:333018)   #3
Miss Hardt
Veteran
 
Miss Hardt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Serbia
Belgrade, Serbia
Posts: 951
Miss Hardt should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I had those somewhere, but I threw away the magazine...what a pitty
Miss Hardt is offline  
Quote
Old 13 Jul 2002, 02:17 (Ref:333081)   #4
kmchow
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location:
Vancouver, BC, CANADA
Posts: 3,919
kmchow should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Thanks to listmembers who told me where to buy "that magazine"--the one with all those numbers, so here goes.

The amounts listed are in US $, millions. First # is cash support, 2nd # is trade/technical support, 3rd # is other sources, 4th # is Grand total.

Ferrari - 224.5m+34.55m+43m=$302.4m
Mclaren - 144.3m+124.5m+19m=$287.8m
BMW - 110.5m+101.5+18m=$230m
Sauber - 55.15m+32.3+17m=$104.35m
Jordan - 64m+112m+14m=$190m
BAR - 98.25m+123.15m+14m=$235.4m
Renault - 139.5m+101.3m+15m=$255.8m
Jaguar - 101.25m+95.52m+15m=$211.77m
Arrows - 31.15m+4.4m+14m=$49.55m
Minardi - 24.55m+42.9m+16m=$83.45m
Toyota - 162.3m+53.2m+22m=$238.m

Looking at these numbers, I am in disbelief. How could so much money be possibly spent on racing? Travelling expenses? Too much in-house technical expertise? I hear teams like to basically have their own aero, mechanical electronic and software engineering teams? Mini-factories as well? Perhaps there should be some joint sharing of parts? YEAH RIGHT!

I once heard that Ferrari has staff working 24 hrs a day, 365 days a year to design/test new cars/parts. My brother doubts that claim. He thinks that during the racing season, but even off-season? Can anyone refute or add their support to those claims?

Last edited by kmchow; 13 Jul 2002 at 02:21.
kmchow is offline  
Quote
Old 13 Jul 2002, 02:22 (Ref:333083)   #5
Lee Janotta
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location:
Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Posts: 4,936
Lee Janotta should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Today: More than 99.9% of earth's population will ever make in their lifetimes.

35 years ago: Enough to buy a second-hand Cooper, Lotus or BRM, freshen the engine, replace the tires and brakes, get the car to the track, and pay the entry fee.

Of interest may be the story of the most obscure F1 entrant ever:

http://f1rejects.crosswinds.net/driv...nes/index.html
Lee Janotta is offline  
__________________
"Put a ****ing wheel on there! Let me go out again!"
-Gilles Villeneuve, Zandvoort, 1979
Quote
Old 13 Jul 2002, 02:40 (Ref:333089)   #6
Jukebox
Veteran
 
Jukebox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Malaysia
KL
Posts: 2,212
Jukebox should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally posted by kmchow
Looking at these numbers, I am in disbelief. How could so much money be possibly spent on racing? Travelling expenses? Too much in-house technical expertise? I hear teams like to basically have their own aero, mechanical electronic and software engineering teams? Mini-factories as well? Perhaps there should be some joint sharing of parts? YEAH RIGHT!
I wouldn't be calling them mini factories as that wouldn';t fit with what they have..LOL

Established teams have their own wind tunnels, like BAR and Jordans...Honda sets up engine workshops to further develop their engines with the teams. Others like Ferrari, Macs, Williams and Renault which enters as a full factory team virtually have huge areas for everything to be centralised. And Ferrari even have their own track to test drive the cars within their vicinity.


Quote:
Originally posted by kmchow
I once heard that Ferrari has staff working 24 hrs a day, 365 days a year to design/test new cars/parts. My brother doubts that claim. He thinks that during the racing season, but even off-season? Can anyone refute or add their support to those claims?
What's not to beleive, they are all employed for the whole year...that's how they got to be where they are now. Windtunnels virtually operates 24 hours a day even for teams like Jaguar. Now even Sauber have their own windtunnel and although they are using Ferrari customer engines, they have this SPE (Sauber Petronas Engineering) to further develop the engines. When we are talking about F1, we are talking about serious involvements in total racing.

Last edited by Jukebox; 13 Jul 2002 at 02:41.
Jukebox is offline  
__________________
more hors3epower
Quote
Old 13 Jul 2002, 19:45 (Ref:333342)   #7
kmchow
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location:
Vancouver, BC, CANADA
Posts: 3,919
kmchow should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Really? Sauber actually continues to develop their Ferrari F1 engines. And Ferrari actually lets them? I guess even if Sauber learns Ferrarri's engine secrets, they don't have the facilities and money to build the engines themselves?
kmchow is offline  
__________________
Supertouring Forever and Ever...
Quote
Old 13 Jul 2002, 19:57 (Ref:333351)   #8
Sato san
Veteran
 
Sato san's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
United Kingdom
Posts: 5,602
Sato san should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridSato san should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
its just all silly money !!!...i think its got all out of hand .
Sato san is offline  
__________________
MOTOR RACING ...The general idea is that the driver behind uses all his Skills, Tricks and Courage to try and overtake the guy ( or Girl ) in front !
Quote
Old 14 Jul 2002, 03:58 (Ref:333489)   #9
Gt_R
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location:
Singapore
Posts: 5,917
Gt_R should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridGt_R should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
From what i heard, yes Sauber actually did a little work on their Ferrari engine supplies. And with the developing relationship, Sauber is no longer enjoying "year-old engines" but "half-year old" engines... Sauber is, if information is correct, currently running the heavily revised engine Ferrari used at Austrialia this year.


Like many, i can't recall the exact values of the team's finances and expenditure...but the minimum cost to start an F1 GP team is really huge...that is excluding the somewhat insanely high deposit the teams have to pay Max & Bernie just to secure a place on the grid. I would think that the engine is one of the most expensive part of the car, and considering how year-old engines cost in the market at the region of $20 to $25 million, you would think developing new engines by Ferrari and BMW are much higher.

If i'm not wrong, currently Ferrari does not need to pay for their tyre supplies. In fact, does Bridgestone actually PAY Ferrari for supplying tires? I do think so, and more often than not, it actually comes together as a deal that allows the tire manufacturers to even supply tires to their road car division. I believe currently Williams and Mclaren also share similar benefits of not having to pay for their tires, but for smaller teams like Minardi, its sadly a different story.

Many have the idea that Ferrari have by far a huge margin more money than the other teams...but many have also failed to take into the account that Ferrari produces inhouse engines, while teams like Mclaren and Williams actually have partners that produce engines for them... taking that into account, Mclaren and Williams spend actually very similar amount of money on their cars as much as Ferrari.

And i think the main reason why teams prefer to have their own inhouse software, electronics, aero department is because of firstly the flexibility and adaptability of the department to their own needs as well as the secrecy of the work carried out.
Gt_R is offline  
__________________
Alonso: "McLaren and Williams are also great racing teams, but Ferrari is the biggest one that you can go to."
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What F1 costs Marbot Formula One 2 21 Feb 2006 02:42
Query regarding costs? ScottDay Club Level Single Seaters 3 25 Feb 2005 16:41
Can costs be cut in F1? manwell Formula One 24 1 Oct 2004 17:25
About costs... ascari Touring Car Racing 7 28 Jan 2004 03:02
Cut Costs SPOONERBORO Formula One 18 28 Apr 2001 16:44


All times are GMT. The time now is 14:38.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.