|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
27 May 2011, 21:13 (Ref:2886893) | #1 | ||
Race Official
20KPINAL
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 23,304
|
This is the BBC's take on it:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/form...e/13572332.stm However there seems to be a contradiction; according to the BBC article, "Team Lotus were allowed to continue running under that name while Group Lotus will keep the black and gold livery, but cannot use the famous badge in F1." but according to the Judgement Summary on Group Lotus's website, "Group Lotus has goodwill associated with the name “Lotus” in Formula 1 and is free to compete in the sport under that name using the Lotus roundel" Somewhat confusing. |
||
__________________
"If you're not winning you're not trying." Colin Chapman. |
27 May 2011, 21:35 (Ref:2886904) | #2 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,320
|
Quote:
Group/Cars are hurt but not completely out. They can use Lotus sponsorship to advertise their cars on the Renault but they'll never be the iconic "Team Lotus" nor can they use Team's heritage unless there are buyouts or whatever. Although far from an ideal position Team is in the better position. They can call themselves Team Lotus and their F1 chasis is a Lotus. They can also have the option to call themselves Caterham Team Lotus. I'm less sure about this but they may even have the option to market certain Caterham models as Caterham Team Lotus in the same way that Renault labeled certain Renault Clio's models with the brand Williams. I presume there will be a buy-out of Group some time in the future. Their business model is very unsound and it depends how much taxmoney the Malaysians are willing to sink into the Group Lotus WorldWide Racing program. |
|||
|
27 May 2011, 21:46 (Ref:2886906) | #3 | |||
Race Official
20KPINAL
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 23,304
|
Quote:
and the Lotus roundel, They are very similar, especially from a distance and also if the car is going at speed. However that doesn't really deal with the apparent contradiction as to whether Lotus can use the roundel or not. |
|||
__________________
"If you're not winning you're not trying." Colin Chapman. |
27 May 2011, 22:42 (Ref:2886921) | #4 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,892
|
From my reading of the report (I couldn't face reading the actual judgement) I'm not sure whether Tony Fernandes's cars can be called Lotus. Clearly they can call their team Team Lotus but Group Lotus have the right to the name Lotus in Formula 1. So if Team Lotus can't call their car a Lotus, do they have to call it a Team Lotus?
It seems the judge thinks his legal colleagues haven't quite relieved the participants of enough money yet, so he has left things sufficiently ambiguous to suck them into a Round 2. I just want to bang their heads together. |
||
|
28 May 2011, 05:40 (Ref:2886966) | #5 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 8,088
|
Quote:
His honour should be commended on actually writing up his judgement and not making everyone wait for 3 years to have the reasons enumerated. |
||
|
28 May 2011, 09:52 (Ref:2887022) | #6 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,808
|
Quote:
The High Court delivered its verdict on the Lotus naming issue on Friday - when Mr Justice Peter Smith declared that Team Lotus was allowed to keep its name and use the Lotus chassis moniker in F1. http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/91788 |
|||
__________________
From redshoes: ''I have no idea who the second Team Hard driver is, and I suspect after the name is announced I'll be none the wiser.'' |
28 May 2011, 09:18 (Ref:2887009) | #7 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,986
|
On the contrary. A Mark is an identifier... something that uniquely distinguishes the user of it from other things. The reason this court case happened was to clarify which one of these two parties would have the right to use the Lotus Mark in Formula One. The judgement maintained the [unacceptable to the parties] status quo by not resolving that matter. All it means is that the dispute will be carried forward to the appeals process. Neither TL nor GL are in 'better positions' following this case... and as has been said, I believe their chassis can be only be called a 'Team Lotus' and not a 'Lotus'.
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[Team] Team Lotus to confirm name and Renault bits but Grp Lotus start Norfolk Civil War? | duke_toaster | Formula One | 255 | 23 Nov 2010 02:52 |
[Team] BBC : Renault lumps for Lotus next year, "Team Lotus" may return | duke_toaster | Formula One | 66 | 17 Sep 2010 20:50 |
Team Lotus | Andrew Kitson | Motorsport Art & Photography | 7 | 15 Nov 2004 02:09 |
Team Lotus | angst | Formula One | 8 | 7 Aug 2000 14:35 |