Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Road Car Forums > Road Car Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 22 Jan 2005, 15:08 (Ref:1207158)   #1
Sharky
Veteran
 
Sharky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location:
London, UK
Posts: 963
Sharky should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridSharky should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridSharky should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
The real effect of higher vs. lower octane fuel

here we only have 2 types of gasoline. 86 octane and 91 octane referred to as Regular and Premium respectively. Now, from what I understand as the air-fuel mix is compressed it increases it's temperature and therefore the temperature could be so high as to light up the mix before the spak plug. Higher octane would give a higher resistance to temperature and therefore avoid this problem. This should be, from what I understand, the reason why cars with higher compression ratios need higher octane fuel. Likewise cars at higher altitudes (like the city where I live which is at 2600 meters above sea level or 8500ft) would need lower octane as there's less air, therefore less pressure as it's compressed and less temperature (PV=nRT).

Anyway, my car has a compression ratio of 9.1:1. Theoretically it would need Premium at sea level but I was told that at this altitude I could use regular and I have done so always. Likewise with my dad's car which has a ratio of 9:1. However, I was told that cars with compression ratios above 9.5:1 need premium even at this altitude. But a friend at work who had a car with a compression ratio of 10:1 used regular even at sea level and he said he didn't have any problems with the car.

But my question is, what are the risks of running a car with a lower octane fuel than the one thet is recommended?
Sharky is offline  
__________________
In the long run, we're all dead. Keynes
Quote
Old 22 Jan 2005, 16:38 (Ref:1207205)   #2
johnh875
Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2004
Australia
Victoria
Posts: 2,540
johnh875 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
If the car does not ping (fuel ignite prematurely as described above) it should be ok. It sounds like a light rattle under accelleration.
johnh875 is offline  
Quote
Old 23 Jan 2005, 00:09 (Ref:1207496)   #3
bartman71
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location:
launceston tas
Posts: 520
bartman71 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
the higher the octane the more ignition timing you can run and more power is produced
bartman71 is offline  
Quote
Old 23 Jan 2005, 01:26 (Ref:1207532)   #4
Mackmot
Veteran
 
Mackmot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
United Kingdom
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Posts: 2,188
Mackmot should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
In the near future there will be no need to worry, direct fuel injection mean zero pre det with whatever fuel at whatever atmos conditions.
Mackmot is offline  
__________________
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
Quote
Old 23 Jan 2005, 15:31 (Ref:1207931)   #5
Sharky
Veteran
 
Sharky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location:
London, UK
Posts: 963
Sharky should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridSharky should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridSharky should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
This ping is like a metallic rattle right? I wasn't sure how it's called in english. I sometimes hear that sound in my car, particularly when going up a steep hill. But the use of premium do9esn't always reduce it.

But what could be the damage caused to the engine caused by the use of lower octane fuel?
Sharky is offline  
__________________
In the long run, we're all dead. Keynes
Quote
Old 23 Jan 2005, 19:47 (Ref:1208094)   #6
Bluebottle
Veteran
 
Bluebottle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
United Kingdom
High Wycombe
Posts: 1,525
Bluebottle should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridBluebottle should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sharky
This ping is like a metallic rattle right? I wasn't sure how it's called in english.
In the UK it's known as pinking.
Bluebottle is offline  
__________________
There are 10 types of people in this world... those who understand binary, and those who don't.
Quote
Old 24 Jan 2005, 08:01 (Ref:1208364)   #7
bartman71
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location:
launceston tas
Posts: 520
bartman71 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
if it is pinking you are risking serious engine damage
eg holed piston in a bad case
bartman71 is offline  
Quote
Old 24 Jan 2005, 08:48 (Ref:1208388)   #8
C32
Rookie
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 23
C32 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Sharky,

I can get 95 octane here.
C32 is offline  
Quote
Old 24 Jan 2005, 16:33 (Ref:1208667)   #9
TimD
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
 
TimD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
United Kingdom
Derbyshire Peak District, United Kingdom
Posts: 3,797
TimD should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridTimD should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridTimD should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
I used to have a Rover 3500 V8 which in manufactured form required 105 octane. I had to retard the timing massively to get it to run cleanly on four-star. The thought of what the pinking was doing to that lovely aluminium engine was too much to bear.
TimD is offline  
Quote
Old 24 Jan 2005, 17:51 (Ref:1208744)   #10
Sharky
Veteran
 
Sharky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location:
London, UK
Posts: 963
Sharky should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridSharky should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridSharky should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
I see. It's a real shame that the government hasn't allowed for the sale of higher octane fuel here although i would think that at the current prices nobody would buy it anyway.

105 octane. Damn!!!

What about all those octane boosters on the market? Are they any good? I wouldn't think so but I've never tried them
Sharky is offline  
__________________
In the long run, we're all dead. Keynes
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Octane booster breezeblock Racing Technology 20 12 Aug 2006 13:14
Octane magazine SL Motorsport History 5 18 May 2003 22:38
Which do you rate higher - Suzuka 1994 or Nurburgring 1995 Yoong Montoya Formula One 16 13 Apr 2003 12:59
Higher wing did'nt mak F1 slower, explanation by an expert...... steve nielsen Formula One 1 31 Mar 2001 02:56


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:11.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.