|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
20 May 2008, 11:48 (Ref:2207252) | #26 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 5,404
|
Quote:
If FIAT's thinking is that WRC is no longer fitting for Lancia's new image (which is very sad IMO, as Lancia were such a major part of international rallying for so many years- it really is the major part of their motorsport heritage in the last 50 years), then realistically F1 is the only area they could place any potential Lancia programme, without having to reposition one of the other brands in sporting terms. |
||
|
20 May 2008, 16:32 (Ref:2207518) | #27 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,100
|
Haven't Alfa stopped making touring cars? In which case we could se Lancia doing tourers.
|
||
__________________
Marbot : "Ironically, the main difference between a Red Bull and a Virgin is that Red Bull can make parts of its car smaller and floppier." |
21 May 2008, 00:50 (Ref:2207903) | #28 | |
Racer
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 436
|
Maserati are in GT racing, whereas FIAT has no prescence in prototypes. This may be a better vehicle for Lancia, as they have history there too.
The question that springs to mind is where they will fit WRC into their program. FIAT seems to be positioning itself to compete in just about every major form of motor sport with one or other identity, so what will the WRC brand be? FIAT itself perhaps? Back on topic, I can't see FIAT buying Toro Rosso. Given that a manufacturer would be the most likely buyer, who would it be? GM? Struggling to get itself out of a hole. Nobody in corporate US believes in F1 enough to buy a team. Opel might be the only brand they've got with a GP history. Ford? See GM Mitsubishi? See GM. Not really cognisant with it's rally/raid image. Nissan? Partner with Renault, not going to be interested. Mazda? Seems to prefer racing it's rotaries, so aside from GT racing, probably not that interested. Suzuki? Too small. Yamaha? Still feeling burnt by F1 from the 90's I suspect. Subaru? The rally company. Has worked with Prodrive for decades, has never been a suggestion it would be something they'd want to do, but I'd suggest it would be with prodrive, if at all. I know there was the flat 12 years ago, but that was really just somebody convincing them to pay for a slightly larger alfa romeo engine from the 70's.... VAG? Intriguing possibility, but they've already said no often enough they might believe it. Probably the only company with enough backing that has a big enough hole in it's brand imagery to justify it, but which brand? VW? No. Bugatti? No history in living memory but has been the technology flagship of late. Audi? Connotations of Nazi auto unions (though Mercedes has successfully moved on). Lamborghini? Not much history, but did supply a very good engine in the 90's under chrysler ownership. Would be a good fit going up against Ferrari. Skoda? You've got to be kidding me. Do they own Seat? See Skoda. What else is there? Who else? Tata? Stranger things have happened, but possibly still chewing on the cost of buying Land Rover & Jaguar. Proton? C'mon! Hyundai? Hmmmm. They're big enough, ambitious enough, have had WRC and touring car experience in the past. Hmmmm. Kia? Part of Ford now aren't they? See Ford. The others I haven't mentioned have been omitted purely because this post is long enough already - ! All this means I think a manufacturer (aside from VAG or Hyundai) isn't likely to buy it, which leaves another entrepeneur willing to give it a go. There's plenty around, but would somebody in the league of a Branson really think a middling F1 team fits his/her image? The first thing you'd need is an engine (Cosworth surely?) and the second thing you'd need is a chassis/gearbox (Lola/Dallara/even Panoz?) The hurdles are huge, but if you got started right now it might work out. Last edited by Malfunction Junction; 21 May 2008 at 00:55. |
|
|
21 May 2008, 01:19 (Ref:2207914) | #29 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 5,073
|
Renault owns Nissan, I believe so no reason to compete against themselves particularly when the commitment to the existing program is not exactly solid.
GM pulled the plug on the Cadillac program...if that was too expensive...and keep in mind they have a fairly heavy $$ commitment in NASCAR here. Mazda is part of Ford - not sure if Mitsu is still partially owned by whoever owns Chrysler these days. Either way, these folks have nothing to gain by spending $300 million or more/year on F1. As far as individual entrepeneurs I can't think of anyone with pockets deep enough to be able to spend (or attract) $300 million per season for the glory of dicing with Force India. Bottom line is that the economics of F1 are all wrong for an era when credit is drying up and the economy is slowing. |
||
__________________
"He's still a young guy and I always think, slightly morbidly, the last thing you learn is how to die and at the end of the day everybody learns every single day." - The Ever-Cheerfull Ron Dennis on Lewis Hamilton. |
21 May 2008, 06:26 (Ref:2207984) | #30 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 5,404
|
Quote:
If you look back, for years we had various guises of Quattro demonstrating their use of 4wd in WRC, DTM, IMSA, Supertouring and so on. The R8= FSI injection, and the R10 shows off their diesel capabilities. Unless F1 starts allowing diesels, or Audi start fitting KERS into their road cars, I'd be surprised to see them in F1 anytime soon. Currently sportscars seem to be a better fit for them, F1 just doesn't strike me as being particularly relevant to Audi's image. Skoda has a stack of motorsport heritage to exploit, but it's very centred on rallying- if VAG take Skoda back into motorsport it'll probably be WRC again. Yes, SEAT are part of VAG, seem very keen on promoting a sporting image but they're heavily committed in touring cars- again I don't see them going elsewhere right now |
||
|
21 May 2008, 07:44 (Ref:2208049) | #31 | ||||||||||||||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,100
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Who else? Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Silly idea of my own : some Russian businessman (Abramovich or similar) and ... LADA! |
||||||||||||||
__________________
Marbot : "Ironically, the main difference between a Red Bull and a Virgin is that Red Bull can make parts of its car smaller and floppier." |
21 May 2008, 09:11 (Ref:2208100) | #32 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 659
|
I dont think money will be an issue for FIAT/Ferrari. All they need is to make trip to middle east and get some shiekh as an investor for team B. however I doubt this will happen anytime soon because
a) Uncertainty of FIA and future rules because of Max Mosley b) Ferrari just got themselves involved in A1GP |
||
|
21 May 2008, 09:19 (Ref:2208110) | #33 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,723
|
No one seems to have mentioned that VAG is predominantly owned and controlled by Porsche who of course have a company policy of NOT competing with anyone if possible. Now if they could get F1 to be a one make series????
Seriously, F1 is just too dumb to be ttractive to VAG with it's restrictive technical specifications. In fact my worry is that unless there are some changes it might become too technically dumb for BMW, Mercedes, Renault, Toyota and Honda. THat very problem may make F1 less technically competitive and thus more attractive to an emerging manufacturer like Tata, or China inc. to try and attract some high tech image. Hyundai would be a good fit too. |
||
__________________
Geting old is mandatory, acting old is optional. |
24 May 2008, 00:12 (Ref:2210119) | #34 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,214
|
In 2010, i dont get the new regs. Odds are it will mean that teams and owners like Berger will most likely walk away from the sport
Surely the sport needs more cars on the grid. I know i woudl hate seeing only 16 cars on the grid |
|
__________________
We may not always get what we want...as long as we dont get what we deserve. |
24 May 2008, 09:32 (Ref:2210259) | #35 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 874
|
Now I would quite like to see SAAB via GM.
But according to that massive list of various auto manufacturers, Malfunction Junction, it seems that nobody could want in after all! When the costs come down, I will buy in myself. |
||
__________________
Belgian GP commentary: "Friday morning was nice and sunny - but not for Erik Comas, who crashed heavily." |
24 May 2008, 11:31 (Ref:2210326) | #36 | ||
Race Official
20KPINAL
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 21,606
|
Me too...
|
||
__________________
Show me a man who won't give it to his woman An' I'll show you somebody who will |
25 May 2008, 00:35 (Ref:2210926) | #37 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,911
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
Contrary to popular opinion, I do have mechanical sympathy, I always feel sorry for the cars I drive. |
25 May 2008, 08:23 (Ref:2211041) | #38 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 5,404
|
Quote:
If you're mid-pack or back of the grid, 3-car teams simply decreases your chances of ever getting into the points. Even worse, if a manufacturer bails out- and they will- you lose three cars with each one that goes instead of two. If we reach the point of 3-car teams, then we're in big trouble... It's nothing more than moving the deckchairs on the Titanic... |
||
|
25 May 2008, 08:25 (Ref:2211043) | #39 | |
Veteran
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 629
|
Quote:
|
|
|
25 May 2008, 08:32 (Ref:2211049) | #40 | ||
Retired
20KPINAL
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,897
|
Quote:
|
||
|
25 May 2008, 11:41 (Ref:2211175) | #41 | ||
Race Official
20KPINAL
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 21,606
|
The top teams (read manufacturers) would buy an build B teams, sell them cheap for privateers and keep them in a rotatory way just like the post-Jordan team has been in the last years... that would be a way out of the 3 car rule.
|
||
__________________
Show me a man who won't give it to his woman An' I'll show you somebody who will |
26 May 2008, 01:07 (Ref:2211858) | #42 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 6,635
|
I still think that the three-car teams could be a good idea, put it as an optional for manufacturers. Is an excellent business for them if they can conquer all the podium for themselves.
Quote:
|
|||
|
26 May 2008, 01:12 (Ref:2211862) | #43 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 6,635
|
BTW, there are no news about the Lancia comeback rumour???
|
||
|
26 May 2008, 07:47 (Ref:2211959) | #44 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2
|
Cant see it myself and has no one else noticed the VW sponsership on the Torro Rosso pit walls and trucks
A tentitive toe in the water before full ownership and rebranding ? |
||
|
26 May 2008, 09:38 (Ref:2212025) | #45 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,100
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
Marbot : "Ironically, the main difference between a Red Bull and a Virgin is that Red Bull can make parts of its car smaller and floppier." |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lancia ECV Group S | JAG | Rallying & Rallycross | 27 | 10 Oct 2010 09:29 |
Lancia Delta Evo | mrsweety | Historic Racing Today | 3 | 1 May 2007 22:42 |
bring back lancia | gazzarallie | Rallying & Rallycross | 10 | 18 Jul 2002 08:49 |
LANCIA D50 | Peter Mallett | Motorsport History | 6 | 27 May 2001 16:03 |
Lancia, Vincenzo | marcus | The Driver Files | 3 | 20 May 2001 10:02 |