|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
27 Jun 2010, 22:53 (Ref:2718990) | #76 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,809
|
The old system was abused by a driver who ignored yellows and ploughed straight into the wreck for which the yellows were deployed. What's the chap's name? Something like Alfonso?
|
||
__________________
Birmingham City FC. Founded 1875. League Cup Winners 2011. |
27 Jun 2010, 23:01 (Ref:2718993) | #77 | |||
Race Official
20KPINAL
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 23,281
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
"If you're not winning you're not trying." Colin Chapman. |
28 Jun 2010, 11:42 (Ref:2719210) | #78 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 13,000
|
One obvious rule changed that's required is to stop pitstops being made under the safety car, except for weather changes and obvious damage. There's no issue of cars running out of fuel anymore, so no reason why teams should be allowed tog et a 'free' pitstop anymore. I'd rather see enforced use of the pitlane speel limiter instead though, as this would keep the cars roughly the same distance apart as before and prevent races being turned upside down by pure luck.
|
||
|
28 Jun 2010, 12:17 (Ref:2719226) | #79 | |||
Rookie
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 28
|
Quote:
The rules as they stand, allow teams/drivers to gain a free pitsop thus ruining the racing. If the safety car is deployed, the pitlane exit should close till the train has gone past. You can still stop for safety/repairs, but no-one gains advantage by it. In terms of reducing speed...why not have a second speed limiter/rev limiter setting which could be activated either centrally by race control, or by the driver once the SC lights go on. The pitlane system is already there...its a simple add on which will go some way to reducing risk to marshals, crash vistims & rescue teams. |
|||
|
28 Jun 2010, 12:21 (Ref:2719228) | #80 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,100
|
The fact that the gaps would be preserved is the problem such a system, the point of the SC is that it bunches the cars up so the marshals have longer windows to deal with the accident.
|
||
__________________
Marbot : "Ironically, the main difference between a Red Bull and a Virgin is that Red Bull can make parts of its car smaller and floppier." |
28 Jun 2010, 12:30 (Ref:2719233) | #81 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 17
|
There is a very good point here that these cars do not need to pit for fuel like they did last year, so unless you have a major issue like a puncture, pitting under the safety car should be banned.
If you have no choice other than to pit, then you go to the back of the line and that that as the penalty. Cars should only be pitting during a green flag period and then they all get treated fairly. This would also stop the stupid issue of cars queuing in pit lane and casuing a dangerous situation for pit crews and being unfair to the 2nd driver who has to wait. If you have to pit after the green flag comes out then you will lose a lot of track position, but that cannot be avoided. |
|
|
28 Jun 2010, 12:32 (Ref:2719235) | #82 | |
Retired
20KPINAL
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,897
|
That's a very good point!
No pitting during safety car periods. Of course, the need to change tyres at all would sort it. |
|
|
28 Jun 2010, 13:19 (Ref:2719258) | #83 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,767
|
Quote:
The main problem yesterday was that the SC didn't pick up the leader. Hamilton slowed up but decided to go anyway. I wonder if Alonso is fed up with Hamilton for slowing which prevented him from getting across the SC line in time? |
|||
__________________
Nostagia ain't what it used to be! |
28 Jun 2010, 13:32 (Ref:2719264) | #84 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 5,892
|
The trouble is, banning pitting under the yellow would backfire in some ways, ways that would have you guys complaining all over again.
We've discussed elsewhere how having variables in play about what state the cars are in can help promote overtaking, but if you take this variable out, it's likely that EVERYONE chooses to pit at about the same time, based on what the first man in does. If, incidentally, a caution comes out to prevent this from happening, then one guy effectively goes past the entire field, and we'd complain about that too. This suggestion would basically eliminate strategies like what we saw with Kobayashi, and probably alternate strategies altogether, which would NOT be good for the actual racing. |
||
__________________
The only certainty is that nothing is certain. |
28 Jun 2010, 14:59 (Ref:2719313) | #85 | ||
Race Official
20KPINAL
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 23,281
|
While they continue to have pitstops in F1, the easiest solution would be to get rid of the safetycar line and use the same rules for the SC and pitstops as they do in IndyCar racing; it works, problem solved.
|
||
__________________
"If you're not winning you're not trying." Colin Chapman. |
28 Jun 2010, 15:24 (Ref:2719327) | #86 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 146
|
Quote:
I agree. The americans had this conundrum figured out decades ago. As soon as the race goes full-course yellow, the pits close, and stay closed until the pace car picks up the leader and allows the field to bunch up behind- since the pits are closed, there is no incentive to charge through debris to get a "free" pit stop. Next time by, the pits open. Simple enough. As for closed pits, there are exceptions- if you have a puncture or are nearly out of fuel you may stop, but only do the necessary work on the car to get around one more lap- if you have a puncture, you may replace that tyre but not the others. If you're out of a fuel, a splash 'n' dash, but not a full tank. And while we're at it, split each team's pit crew in two to give each driver his own crew, putting an end to this stacking nonsense. We might even get a "race off pit road". Still surprises me how the americans do this so well and almost every european based series makes such a mess of it. Last edited by captain crunch; 28 Jun 2010 at 15:24. Reason: embarassing typos |
||
__________________
If at first you don't suceed, destroy all evidence that you tried. |
28 Jun 2010, 15:46 (Ref:2719335) | #87 | |
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 205
|
I wish everyone making comments on here would read the regulations!!!!
Firstly, the safety car DOES NOT have to pick the leader up! (Reg 40.6) Secondly, overtaking of the safety car is only allowed under certain circumstances (Reg 40.7), and that is when it is going into the pits with its lights off and only then once it has passed the first safety car line And thirdly, the safety car is deemed to be deployed as soon as the message is posted on the official monitors! Which means NO OVERTAKING from that moment on! And what driver would like outside control of his car to be implemented when in a fast corner?? Lift-off oversteer and straight to the scene of the accident (thereby probably necessitating a further safetycar period. |
|
|
28 Jun 2010, 15:48 (Ref:2719336) | #88 | |||
Race Official
20KPINAL
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 23,281
|
Quote:
Agreed, they should do something about the pit crews. They still have much larger crews per car than in Indy. |
|||
__________________
"If you're not winning you're not trying." Colin Chapman. |
28 Jun 2010, 16:28 (Ref:2719353) | #89 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,809
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
Birmingham City FC. Founded 1875. League Cup Winners 2011. |
28 Jun 2010, 16:36 (Ref:2719358) | #90 | ||
Race Official
20KPINAL
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 23,281
|
|||
__________________
"If you're not winning you're not trying." Colin Chapman. |
28 Jun 2010, 16:38 (Ref:2719359) | #91 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 5,892
|
That's a problem for F1 to fix by allowing a second stall and crew for each team, as I'm assuming they don't at the moment.
There will be NO race off of pit road, because most European pit lanes, and most international pits for that matter, are too narrow to do that even remotely safely. In terms of width, even Martinsville and Bristol are generous in terms of room on pit lane compared to many F1 circuit, and then you have places like Road America and Pocono where you'd have room for three lanes of traffic outside of the pit boxes. |
||
__________________
The only certainty is that nothing is certain. |
28 Jun 2010, 17:29 (Ref:2719395) | #92 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,767
|
|||
__________________
Nostagia ain't what it used to be! |
28 Jun 2010, 17:29 (Ref:2719396) | #93 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 86
|
Change whatever rule you want to but before you scrap any of the SCs save one from the Crusher for me. I'd be happy to drive it around town.
|
||
|
28 Jun 2010, 17:54 (Ref:2719415) | #94 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,809
|
|||
__________________
Birmingham City FC. Founded 1875. League Cup Winners 2011. |
28 Jun 2010, 17:54 (Ref:2719416) | #95 | |||
Race Official
20KPINAL
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 23,281
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
"If you're not winning you're not trying." Colin Chapman. |
28 Jun 2010, 18:01 (Ref:2719419) | #96 | ||
Race Official
20KPINAL
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 23,281
|
|||
__________________
"If you're not winning you're not trying." Colin Chapman. |
28 Jun 2010, 18:27 (Ref:2719431) | #97 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 39
|
All they need to do is to return to closing the pits and have the Safety Car pick up the leader. This worked fine for years, and was only scrapped because it potentially screwed people that required refueling on that given lap...This of course, is not a moot point...
|
|
|
28 Jun 2010, 18:29 (Ref:2719432) | #98 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 275
|
^^
good point, back to the old rule, SC out, pits closed, pits open when deemed safe. |
||
|
28 Jun 2010, 18:49 (Ref:2719439) | #99 | |||
Race Official
20KPINAL
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 23,281
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
"If you're not winning you're not trying." Colin Chapman. |
28 Jun 2010, 19:04 (Ref:2719448) | #100 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 633
|
We can't scrap it for all the reasons listed above. I watch a lot of motorsport and drivers simply don't respect yellow flags in a way that would protect marshals. As there's now no re-fuelling simply bunch the field behind the safety car in race order and only allow pitstops when they are sorted. Teams may have to stack or alter their strategy for the second car, but it's probably the best solution.
|
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
safety car | skaife2 | Australasian Touring Cars. | 6 | 28 Oct 2008 09:22 |
Safety Car procedure. Time for a change? Discuss... | Stuart Hill | Marshals Forum | 28 | 6 Jun 2008 11:11 |
Pictures of the Safety car/doctor car? | McKay | Trackside | 33 | 18 Jun 2003 05:56 |
MG to scrap Touring Car Project | rlinter | Touring Car Racing | 8 | 6 Dec 2001 11:31 |
Time to scrap the current formula | Franklin | ChampCar World Series | 31 | 2 May 2000 17:17 |