|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
11 Mar 2014, 00:19 (Ref:3377265) | #1052 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 889
|
Interesting!
But with those 43 MJ ... are they able to release it per lap- if possible- or are they restricted to a determined max value of release. 8 MJ = 8,000 KW 1 sec in 35sec = 228.35 KW = 306 hp constant during that 35 sec 43 MJ / 8 = 5.375x more or 5.375x35 = 3: min 13: sec almost an entire lap at the average power of 306 hp (which is a lot since they don't need that value at corners and slower parts ) 400hp engine + 306 electric = 706 hp average ! (a LOT for average) the problem is that even with most of *energy of exhaust recuperated... *plus with ultra efficient braking regeneration... *plus with dynamic shock absorber recuperating ( ~1 KWh for 4 wheels which is terrific) http://phys.org/news/2011-07-energy-...ncy-award.html http://phys.org/news188035494.html#nRlv http://phys.org/news153505357.html#nRlv http://phys.org/news432.html#nRlv * plus with the car covered (painted) with solar ambient scavenging cells http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thin-film_solar_cell http://phys.org/news/2011-05-solar-p...nt-energy.html http://www.gizmag.com/electromagnetic-harvester/26130/ *plus with air dynamic wind turbine in the front http://www.gizmag.com/bird-friendly-wind-turbine/23961/ (would be smaller) * plus with B-EMF (somehow) recuperating electric motors http://www.geminielectricmotor.com/ They could achieve much more than 43MJ per lap, but there is no way to recharge a battery of 43MJ (12KWh) in less than 4 minutes !!.. no way So perhaps 16 MJ... which might yet come too short |
|
|
11 Mar 2014, 00:51 (Ref:3377272) | #1053 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,229
|
Most of this stuff about how it's released, how it's recovered, at least what's been announced in press releases, is discussed earlier in this thread.
No wind turbines, no solar cells. |
||
|
11 Mar 2014, 02:10 (Ref:3377283) | #1054 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 889
|
i know there isn't solar cells etc
I was telling *if* they used it and much more, they could reach 43MJ continuous and much more. *All* energy comes from the fuel... what is spend from the high voltage battery (storage) must be re-charged or the battery could fade away long before the end. 12 KWh is only to give it the necessary *power density*, no way in a single lap all that energy is spend and recharged ( for now that is, with current techs). That engine even with only 400 hp *out*, is perhaps putting *in* fuel equivalent to 1800 hp ( lets say 1700) If 8 MJ corresponds roughly to 35sec at 300hp... in 3:35 min (average lap time LM to win) corresponds to 52.3 hp average electric entire lap... 16MJ to 104.6 hp average electric entire lap ... 43 MJ to 281 hp average electric entire lap Yet 400 + 281 = 681 hp average.. for the other 1700 hp or so we have not reached yet overall 50% efficiency. There is still a long road to go... with innovative tech its quite possible around 50% overall efficiency by *recuperation methods (various)*... meaning an hybrid-o- electric could have constantly electric power at least half as powerful the engine ( which is not the case, more than half the time ~2 min will be nothing, and in the rest of time 1:35min, electric quite more powerful than engine ). I hope ZEOD is a great sucess even if it doesn't win... at least it might show that 16 MJ is more than possible... a certainty. [ perhaps this could go to future EVO rules lol ] Last edited by hcl123; 11 Mar 2014 at 02:17. |
|
|
11 Mar 2014, 08:24 (Ref:3377345) | #1055 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,738
|
Quote:
11 laps on the internal combustion engine (400 hp, at LMP2 pace), during which the battery is recovered with braking. Followed by 1 fully electric lap (330 hp, at between LMP2 and GTE pace). Hence the name Zero Emission on Demand. |
||
|
11 Mar 2014, 09:54 (Ref:3377365) | #1056 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 889
|
I did, but i don't think they gonna do that
That is marketing.... he! like a 800 hp engine or something... and there is 2 good valid reasons. 1) the laps with only the engine and or the electric motor are going to be slower... the motor then considerably more ( its much less power overall) -> much better and faster to do it always in hybrid mode like the rest of the teams. 2) the lap with only the battery... electric motor... is going to considerably discharge this battery... each recharge could take at least half a dozen minutes in each "refueling" LOL ... much better do 11 laps only in hybrid mode if possible ( it is ), than that crazy 11+1 marketing stunt... if they want to really really really be "zero emissions" -> get rid of the engine lol [ that marketing stunt could not pose great refueling penalty... unless they go really slow, specially in electric mode... LMP2 pace ? bah! a movable chicane LOL ] |
|
|
11 Mar 2014, 11:00 (Ref:3377379) | #1057 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,738
|
Sorry, but you are wrong. The whole point of the Nissan ZEOD is to show that they can do one lap around the Le Mans on pure electric power
The only issue that they have is that Le Mans is a 24 hour race. It would be rather stupid that car has to come in the pits after every lap and stand stationary for 30 minutes to recharge the battery before it can do a next lap. |
|
|
11 Mar 2014, 16:46 (Ref:3377443) | #1058 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 889
|
yes but that is not much of an accomplishment... even the Leaf could 6 or 7 laps at full throttle (much slower). Tesla much more, Renault, BMW, Mercedes... Audi the same ( all have electric cars able to have many laps full throttle )
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7dTFKX6NgnM (R8 e-tron all electric not bad.. fast) To me as you are saying, they are there to capitalize a marketing stunt... a sunday drive shown ... not a race. |
|
|
11 Mar 2014, 16:53 (Ref:3377444) | #1059 | |
Racer
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 365
|
So you think is that easy to make a car go at 300 km/h and can go around entire lap on electric, then repeat that every 11 laps for the duration of 24 hours?
|
|
|
11 Mar 2014, 17:15 (Ref:3377453) | #1060 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 662
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
11 Mar 2014, 17:36 (Ref:3377461) | #1061 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,269
|
|||
__________________
When in doubt? C4. |
12 Mar 2014, 18:29 (Ref:3377896) | #1062 | |
Racer
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 365
|
||
|
12 Mar 2014, 19:55 (Ref:3377930) | #1063 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 128
|
Looking tidy....makes you wonder what those ducts above rear wheels are doing and why different sizes.
|
||
|
12 Mar 2014, 20:02 (Ref:3377932) | #1064 | |
Racer
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 365
|
Perhaps one radiator cooling the engine, the other the battery (simplifying things) and depending on the weather one may need less air "in" than the other?...
|
|
|
12 Mar 2014, 20:08 (Ref:3377938) | #1065 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 128
|
They look as though they would have pretty dramatic effect on the aero if cooling is their only purpose. Hope we eventually get the answer.
|
||
|
12 Mar 2014, 21:22 (Ref:3377967) | #1066 | |
Racer
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 365
|
||
|
12 Mar 2014, 22:55 (Ref:3378011) | #1067 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 15,680
|
That picture gives a good sense of scale with the driver sitting there.
|
||
|
12 Mar 2014, 23:42 (Ref:3378029) | #1068 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 889
|
Quote:
http://tentenths.com/forum/showpost....postcount=3267 http://tentenths.com/forum/showpost....postcount=3274 Win! |
||
|
13 Mar 2014, 05:08 (Ref:3378073) | #1069 | |
Racer
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 365
|
On the other hand, the exits are in a very large low pressure area, behind the flat rear, so that may have some really great effect on reducing overall radiator drag. If they are closing the intake on that radiator (assuming is the engine radiator) and they are at 400 hp, that sounds really good, considering how much cooling issues the DW had (as long as the reports were true) when it changed to the more powerful engine.
|
|
|
13 Mar 2014, 08:33 (Ref:3378102) | #1070 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 128
|
Quote:
Testing photos seem to show Gurney flaps on one side only though one picture looks as though some bodywork is missing so looks like some experimenting going (guess that's what testing is for!). Good that we are getting a bit of a look in though. |
|||
|
17 Mar 2014, 16:41 (Ref:3381108) | #1071 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,873
|
|||
|
17 Mar 2014, 17:07 (Ref:3381120) | #1072 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 128
|
I agree the Zeod is a much better rendition of the DW design. The nose of the Zeod looks so much better than the phallic snout on the DW and the cockpit looks in proportion to the car. It seems a pity the Panoz version now looks so much uglier. Perhaps the Zeod might inspire some beautifying of the DW once they can find some reliability.
|
||
|
3 Apr 2014, 12:36 (Ref:3388260) | #1073 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,361
|
|||
|
3 Apr 2014, 17:43 (Ref:3388361) | #1074 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,361
|
|||
|
3 Apr 2014, 17:45 (Ref:3388364) | #1075 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 11,697
|
looking forward to actually seeing it race
|
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The never ending Toyota return to Le Mans (LMP1) Saga | The Badger | ACO Regulated Series | 6844 | 8 Jan 2014 02:19 |
[LM24] Nissan GT-R at the Le Mans 24 Hours race? | baszero | 24 Heures du Mans | 37 | 14 Mar 2013 11:52 |
[LM24] BEHIND THE SCENES with NISSAN preparing LE MANS 2012 with WINNER OF LE MANS 2011 | JackJack | 24 Heures du Mans | 2 | 31 May 2012 07:17 |
[LM24] When do you think Porsche will return to Le Mans? | H16 | 24 Heures du Mans | 3 | 14 Nov 2001 10:38 |