Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Saloon & Sportscar Racing > Australasian Touring Cars.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 13 Sep 2002, 15:01 (Ref:379656)   #1
Forbesy
Racer
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location:
Adelaide, SA
Posts: 109
Forbesy should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Bathurst 24 Hour

Haven't heard much about this interesting event, I know that Channel 7 are giving quite good coverage (about 5 hours plus updates) but what cars are coming out, and will the field even get close to the 83 car grid they were wanting. There's such a wide range of cars that are eligible that would make for a fantastic race.

The sheer logistics of staging an event like this would be a nightmare, with officials and flaggies that need to be allocated on the job for 24 hours, plus the substantial lighting that would be needed around the circuit. In some ways I can't see it going ahead.

Any thoughts??

Cheers,

Forbesy
Forbesy is offline  
Quote
Old 14 Sep 2002, 01:03 (Ref:379972)   #2
DNQ
Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Australia
Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 4,071
DNQ should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I am wondering if they will make the full 83 car grid also.

The Sandown 500 had approximatly 30 cars, it's pretty safe to say we'll have at least that many at Bathurst. I think 10-15 overseas cars is a far target, and there will be a few future tourers as well, so I'd say at least 50 cars is likely, but I think 83 is stretching it a long way.
DNQ is offline  
__________________
Don't let manufacturers ruin F1. RIP Tyrrell, Arrows, Prost, Minardi, Jordan.
Quote
Old 14 Sep 2002, 03:00 (Ref:380001)   #3
William Dale Jr
Veteran
 
William Dale Jr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Australia
Townsville, North Queensland
Posts: 1,225
William Dale Jr should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Now I've been wondering about this for a while: can someone explain to me just how they are going to fit 83 cars at Bathurst? There are only 55 pit garages, aren't there? How is that going to work?
William Dale Jr is offline  
__________________
"Our traction control was kinda how much your last crash was still hurting you." - Kevin Schwantz
Quote
Old 14 Sep 2002, 03:25 (Ref:380007)   #4
DNQ
Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Australia
Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 4,071
DNQ should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I've wanted to know that myself - 83 cars just seems like too many to me, I don't think the track can support that many.
DNQ is offline  
__________________
Don't let manufacturers ruin F1. RIP Tyrrell, Arrows, Prost, Minardi, Jordan.
Quote
Old 14 Sep 2002, 05:52 (Ref:380024)   #5
mac
Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 5,702
mac should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridmac should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridmac should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
To tell you the truth, I would not be too disappointed if they did not get 83 cars.
mac is offline  
Quote
Old 14 Sep 2002, 11:10 (Ref:380090)   #6
racer69
Veteran
 
racer69's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Australia
Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,040
racer69 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridracer69 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
They are extending the pitlane up Mountain Straight.

I think anywhere around 55 or so would be a good turn-up for the first year.
racer69 is offline  
__________________
"The Great Race"
22 November 1960 - 21 July 1999
Quote
Old 16 Sep 2002, 07:45 (Ref:381297)   #7
DNQ
Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Australia
Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 4,071
DNQ should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Actually - have ANY car lineups actually been confirmed at this stage? I know there is a lot of interest, but has anyone actually got a full lineup ready and sorted out? I wouldn't be surprised if the answer is no, it's still 2 months away, but I am interested???
DNQ is offline  
__________________
Don't let manufacturers ruin F1. RIP Tyrrell, Arrows, Prost, Minardi, Jordan.
Quote
Old 16 Sep 2002, 07:58 (Ref:381307)   #8
Seton_5
Racer
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location:
Melbourne
Posts: 164
Seton_5 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Yeah how are they planning to get 83 cars in Pitlane? they only have 55 or so Pitbays. In 1999 and 200 they had 55 for bathurst and can rmember it was very tight for space.
Seton_5 is offline  
Quote
Old 16 Sep 2002, 07:59 (Ref:381308)   #9
Seton_5
Racer
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location:
Melbourne
Posts: 164
Seton_5 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Oh sorry just saw Racer69's post.

Sorry!
Seton_5 is offline  
Quote
Old 16 Sep 2002, 08:05 (Ref:381311)   #10
DNQ
Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Australia
Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 4,071
DNQ should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Regarding racer69's post, I read that back in Auto Action a while back, seems likes that's what they want to do/are going to do.
DNQ is offline  
__________________
Don't let manufacturers ruin F1. RIP Tyrrell, Arrows, Prost, Minardi, Jordan.
Quote
Old 17 Sep 2002, 08:06 (Ref:382186)   #11
sevi
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location:
brisbane Australia
Posts: 1,049
sevi should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
They have about 40% of the number of officials needed for the weekend.
The entry list is not being released because of some reason, did read what it was but it is buried deep in my head with all other bits of useless information.
sevi is offline  
__________________
The legal fraternity, proudly supported by V8 Supercars!
Quote
Old 17 Sep 2002, 08:54 (Ref:382239)   #12
DNQ
Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Australia
Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 4,071
DNQ should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Another thing...I read some Super Tourers will be racing...this has probably been covered somewere else, but under what group are they permitted to take part? Group 10? If so, anyone else notice that half the entries are in Group 10....?
DNQ is offline  
__________________
Don't let manufacturers ruin F1. RIP Tyrrell, Arrows, Prost, Minardi, Jordan.
Quote
Old 17 Sep 2002, 12:23 (Ref:382414)   #13
racer69
Veteran
 
racer69's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Australia
Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,040
racer69 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridracer69 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I think they will probably be in Group 10. I think that was probably the point of Group 10, if they couldn't get a really big field, then there was Group 10 for anyone who wanted to compete.
racer69 is offline  
__________________
"The Great Race"
22 November 1960 - 21 July 1999
Quote
Old 21 Sep 2002, 20:24 (Ref:385523)   #14
Tony_Simpson
Veteran
 
Tony_Simpson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location:
Uxbridge
Posts: 544
Tony_Simpson should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Is there a web site with entries/race results etc around yet???
Tony_Simpson is offline  
Quote
Old 22 Sep 2002, 00:30 (Ref:385653)   #15
DNQ
Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Australia
Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 4,071
DNQ should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
http://www.bathurst24hr.com/ - No official entry list, but news etc
http://www.conrod.com.au/ - Check the forum for a list of eligble cars
DNQ is offline  
__________________
Don't let manufacturers ruin F1. RIP Tyrrell, Arrows, Prost, Minardi, Jordan.
Quote
Old 23 Sep 2002, 01:56 (Ref:386260)   #16
alfasud
Veteran
 
alfasud's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
New Zealand
Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 972
alfasud should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
So what's the latest word about the rumoured 7 litre Monaro entry?
http://www.bathurst24hr.com/newsitem.asp?news_id=577

I can't help but feel that Holden is quite comfortable with there being just one big Bathurst race.... the V8 event with rules that allow only Holdens and one other car, and that they win on a regular basis. I suspect that they hope the 24hr race doesn't detract from the V8 event and wouldn't be too sad if it was a flop.

Then, while European teams are trying to decide if they want to enter their Group N-GT in the Bathurst 24hrs, they let it be known that they're got this 7 litre Monaro, that's potentially 5 seconds a lap faster that a V8 supercar. Gosh.... we hope that doesn't put anyone off entering the race!!!!

Or am I being too cynical here?
alfasud is offline  
Quote
Old 23 Sep 2002, 02:19 (Ref:386267)   #17
05forever
Racer
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location:
New South Wales
Posts: 113
05forever should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I would like to know how the Monaro is even being considered as an entrant. Can I go and buy one this arvo? I know I cant buy any Ford/Holden supercars but isn't the production car championship??

How many have to be produced before you can race them? One??

Will it retain the same shell/aero package of the stocker monaro if so i dont think I would like to have to drive the thing down conrod at a potential 340/50 kmh for a day. Sounds a bit suss to me.
05forever is offline  
Quote
Old 23 Sep 2002, 07:43 (Ref:386341)   #18
racer69
Veteran
 
racer69's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Australia
Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,040
racer69 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridracer69 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Nations Cup isn't a Production Car Championship, hence why cars like the Monaro can compete.

I really want to know what is happening with the project. There were meant to be 4 cars built, and the first was meant to be seen at Oran Park in May. Then they were meant to be raced at Indy so some Parity adjustments could be made prior to Bathurst, yet now i here that it's first race will be Bathurst and that there will only be just the 1 car, possibly without any Holden backing! Is this true?
racer69 is offline  
__________________
"The Great Race"
22 November 1960 - 21 July 1999
Quote
Old 23 Sep 2002, 10:34 (Ref:386464)   #19
alfasud
Veteran
 
alfasud's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
New Zealand
Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 972
alfasud should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Nations Cup isn't a Production Car Championship.... maybe not for *standard* production cars, but you can go to your friendly Porsche dealer and order a 911 GT3 (or have they all been sold now?) with the same engine block and heads as used in the Nations Cup, same with the Ferrari 360.... these are Production Cars after all, but a 7 litre Monaro?

Maybe I could enter a FIA GT Lister Storm in the Nations Cup class for Bathurst 24hrs - there's more of those around than 7 litre Monaro's!!!
alfasud is offline  
Quote
Old 23 Sep 2002, 11:11 (Ref:386487)   #20
mtpanorama
Veteran
 
mtpanorama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Australia
Bathurst (best racetrack in the world)
Posts: 2,485
mtpanorama should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally posted by alfasud

Maybe I could enter a FIA GT Lister Storm in the Nations Cup class for Bathurst 24hrs - there's more of those around than 7 litre Monaro's!!!
You could enter it...........with the appropriate parity adjustments. Thats the point of the competition in Nations cup. Whether you like it or not.
mtpanorama is offline  
__________________
I couldn't repair your brakes, so I made your horn louder

I can please only one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow isn't looking good, either
Quote
Old 24 Sep 2002, 01:37 (Ref:386999)   #21
alfasud
Veteran
 
alfasud's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
New Zealand
Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 972
alfasud should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Actually I couldn't enter it.... the car itself has to be eligible. Which is the point I'm making - exactly what is eligible, and don't all entrants have a right to know?

Looking at the series rules:
http://www.procar.com.au/2002_NC_regs_sheet.pdf

"2.2 Vehicle eligibility schedule"

"2.2 a. Only vehicles listed in the Vehicle Eligibility Schedule at the end of this Part are eligible to enter....."

"2.2 f. ......at least 75 identically similar examples of bona-fide production cars (build date no later than 1st March 2002) available throughout the world of which 2 such example must be registered or capable of being registered for normal road use in Australia...."

Later on (in 2.2 g) it states that "PROCAR, with the prior written approval of CAMS may admit cars for competition by varying these eligibility regulations....."

The interesting thing with the Vehicle Eligibility Schedule, is that it lists the cars and their capacities. For the Holden Monaro CV8, the capacity is listed as "TBA".

But here it is listed as 7000cc:
http://www.procar.com.au/cardetail.asp?carspecid=97

So it seems that the rules might be bent for Holden (unless there really are 75 of these 7L Monaros!) under the "PROCAR... may admit cars" clause, but has CAMS provided that written approval?

If I was about to spend a small fortune, bringing a team of Porsche GT3 or Ferrari 360 from Europe, with the hope of an outright victory, I'd certainly want to know what other cars were also eligible to compete for that outright victory.

Maybe that's one reason the entries are a bit slow to be confirmed at the moment.
alfasud is offline  
Quote
Old 1 Oct 2002, 21:46 (Ref:393482)   #22
Crash Test
Veteran
 
Crash Test's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Australia
Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,208
Crash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridCrash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Hrmmm, interesting that they've had to extend the deadline for entries- they've only got 40 odd, looking for 50. I suppose that means that they won't have to extend the pit lane??

Also interesting to see IMG take out ads looking for volunteers... has this ever been done before? They sound a bit desperate...
Crash Test is offline  
__________________
Love you long time
Quote
Old 1 Oct 2002, 21:58 (Ref:393494)   #23
Flaggie
Racer
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location:
Australia
Posts: 344
Flaggie should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
They are desperate.... They have 93 flaggies for the whole event. They need at least 140.
Flaggie is offline  
Quote
Old 1 Oct 2002, 23:34 (Ref:393562)   #24
05forever
Racer
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location:
New South Wales
Posts: 113
05forever should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
IS this a full IMG promotion on risk basis ala V8 Bathurst or a promote for a fee race? Who is paying the bills?

Not enough flaggies, not enough entries sounds like it may not be the most desirable start for the event. I hope that they see it through.
05forever is offline  
Quote
Old 2 Oct 2002, 00:18 (Ref:393588)   #25
Crash Test
Veteran
 
Crash Test's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Australia
Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,208
Crash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridCrash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
I think IMG are handling the official's side of things for a fee...

So what went wrong? They were confident of 80 odd cars... not enough time??
Crash Test is offline  
__________________
Love you long time
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bathurst 24 Hour djt46 Sportscar & GT Racing 26 26 Aug 2005 07:03
Bathurst 24 hour louonline Australasian Touring Cars. 44 16 Jul 2004 10:31
Bathurst 24 hour. rossp1 Sportscar & GT Racing 53 27 Oct 2003 09:57
Who's going to Bathurst 24 Hour D.R.T. Australasian Touring Cars. 23 19 Jul 2002 12:59
Bathurst 24 Hour Michael H Sportscar & GT Racing 1 16 Jun 2002 12:32


All times are GMT. The time now is 15:02.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.