|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
30 Oct 2010, 16:39 (Ref:2782597) | #101 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 5,361
|
But surely by that point they had already invested significant resources into building their own car?
|
||
__________________
"The more I see of the world, the more am I dissatisfied with it; every day confirms my belief of the inconsistency of all human characters, and of the little dependence which can be placed on the appearance of either merit or sense." -- Elizabeth Bennet, 'Pride & Prejudice' |
30 Oct 2010, 22:12 (Ref:2782723) | #102 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 8,088
|
||
|
1 Nov 2010, 04:55 (Ref:2783226) | #103 | ||
Race Official
20KPINAL
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 23,230
|
I doubt it as well. Anyway, it looks like HRT are bidding for the TF110.
|
||
__________________
"If you're not winning you're not trying." Colin Chapman. |
1 Nov 2010, 12:44 (Ref:2783391) | #104 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 5,361
|
That wasn't my point. Irrespective of what Toyota had invested in developing this season's car, if Lotus had started to build their own and then just bought it from Toyota instead, it would have been a waste of their own time and money to start developing a car in the first place.
|
||
__________________
"The more I see of the world, the more am I dissatisfied with it; every day confirms my belief of the inconsistency of all human characters, and of the little dependence which can be placed on the appearance of either merit or sense." -- Elizabeth Bennet, 'Pride & Prejudice' |
1 Nov 2010, 13:10 (Ref:2783412) | #105 | |
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 1998
Posts: 16,760
|
isn't there still a legal case involving lotus racing and the wind tunnel used by themselves and force india or something? i know there was a verdict about a related case reasonably recently.
|
|
__________________
devils advocate in-chief and professional arguer of both sides |
1 Nov 2010, 21:09 (Ref:2783720) | #106 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 453
|
Quote:
Anyway, my point is, isn't a wind tunnel a poor investment at this point in the game? |
||
|
5 Nov 2010, 12:19 (Ref:2785320) | #107 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,100
|
|||
__________________
Marbot : "Ironically, the main difference between a Red Bull and a Virgin is that Red Bull can make parts of its car smaller and floppier." |
5 Nov 2010, 17:27 (Ref:2785460) | #108 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,742
|
There will be a Lotus-Renault on the grid but it will probably not be the Lotus we think
Saward pointed out a week or 2 ago that one of the investors in Renault, a long-time business partner of Gerard Lopez, has links to Malaysia and Proton, and thus it wouldn't be unreasonable to suggest Group Lotus could be about to invest in Renault F1. It seems this is true, as Autosport are now reporting this, and that Renault F1 will become Lotus next year, also suggesting that Fernandes has lost the fight So as it stands, we may have Lotus-Renault and 1Malaysia-Renault |
||
__________________
F1 fans - over-reacting about everything since forever |
5 Nov 2010, 18:32 (Ref:2785499) | #109 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 11,177
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
5 Nov 2010, 18:34 (Ref:2785501) | #110 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,900
|
This deal, of course, is separate from Renault supplying Lotus Racing with engines for next year. Lotus - the car company - are looking to expand their presence in motorsports with an IndyCar team, LMP2 and LMGT2 cars, and now a link up with the Renault Formula One team. Who in turn will be supplying Lotus - the F1 team - with engines for next year. Meanwhile, Lotus Cars and Lotus Racing are having a bit of a kerfuffle over the Team Lotus name, previously owned by David Hunt but sold to Lotus Racing.
It'll be interesting to see how Lotus Renault and Lotus Renault compare on track next year. Lotus have really made an impression as one of the new teams, clearly best of the bunch. I can see why Lotus are interested in the link up with Renault though, it makes sense as Renault are a strong team that have lost their way in recent years. Bruno Senna is set to join Lotus Renault next year. I can't wait to see how he stacks up against Kubica, a very highly rated... no... wait, he's joining Lotus Renault, not Lotus Renault isn't he? In that case he will be against former Kovalainen, who drove for Renault few years ago. It will be great seeing him in a Lotus Renault then. So... he's going back to his old team...? No, he's staying put at Lotus Renault, who of course might be called Team Lotus unless the rights are claimed by Lotus Renault. I wonder if Trulli loses his Lotus Renault seat to Senna, if he might rejoin his old team Lotus Ren... oh forget it. |
||
__________________
I can't drive 55. |
5 Nov 2010, 18:52 (Ref:2785508) | #111 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 602
|
Sounds like a certain someone has had one too many.
|
|
|
5 Nov 2010, 19:07 (Ref:2785516) | #112 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,100
|
The easiest solution - and best one we could hope for - is Tony Fernandes to buy Group Lotus and just to kill the whole nonsense on the head. Will it happen? Don't bet on it.
|
||
__________________
Marbot : "Ironically, the main difference between a Red Bull and a Virgin is that Red Bull can make parts of its car smaller and floppier." |
5 Nov 2010, 20:16 (Ref:2785538) | #113 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 601
|
Quote:
I'd like that to happen myself, plus Lotus Cars will be run from Norwich then and not corprate offices in Malaysia |
|||
__________________
It isn't premarital sex if you have no intention of getting married. |
5 Nov 2010, 22:15 (Ref:2785577) | #114 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 544
|
http://joesaward.wordpress.com/2010/...ease-stand-up/
So, the team that returned the Lotus name to F1 and has the blessing of Clive Chapman will no longer be allowed to call themselves Team Lotus, but a car company that has been separate for 40 years is allowed to rebrand the Renault team as Team Lotus. Right... |
||
__________________
Louise: Is the track Slippery when Wet? DC: I didn't know you were a Bon Jovi fan |
5 Nov 2010, 23:44 (Ref:2785623) | #115 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 453
|
Quote:
?!?!? WTF ?!?!?! This is even worse....... |
||
|
5 Nov 2010, 23:46 (Ref:2785625) | #116 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,216
|
I think Tony Fernandes will call his team Air Asia F1 or Air Asia Racing rather than 1Malaysia Racing. Similar to his GP2 team.
|
||
|
5 Nov 2010, 23:52 (Ref:2785626) | #117 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 7,979
|
There's a lawsuit still pending in the High Court, but the decision has already been made in Malaysia?
Am I missing something here? What gives them the right? |
|
|
6 Nov 2010, 00:15 (Ref:2785634) | #118 | ||
Race Official
20KPINAL
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 23,230
|
So Renault are going to become Lotus? It's like something from Monty Python.
|
||
__________________
"If you're not winning you're not trying." Colin Chapman. |
6 Nov 2010, 01:05 (Ref:2785643) | #119 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 601
|
I do like Lotus (Team Lotus and Lotus Cars) but if Lotus Racing end up going then Group Lotus can stick it right up there!
|
||
__________________
It isn't premarital sex if you have no intention of getting married. |
6 Nov 2010, 08:49 (Ref:2785695) | #120 | |||
Race Official
1% Club
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 46,695
|
Quote:
Personally I dont see the value in a Team Lotus in the green livery, without commercial backing... but Lotus will be a hero brand that has history which can be parlayed So will Mr Fernandes move the team name to Team Air Asia, or go hunting for another, different name? Team Tyrrell is well known, multiple WDC winner, albeit in a galaxy long long ago... maybe Mercedrs GP could onsell that brand? |
|||
|
6 Nov 2010, 08:54 (Ref:2785696) | #121 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 335
|
|||
|
6 Nov 2010, 11:44 (Ref:2785741) | #122 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,742
|
I'm not really that sympathetic towards Fernandes myself. I've been quite sceptical for a while about how much he really "loves" Lotus - I think it's a bit superficial. He's OK but he's still a businessman first and foremost. He has set out from the beginning to build up a brand - a brand that he didn't even own, no less. I remember the outcry when it was first announced - "Fauxtus" and all that. Yet now people are turning against the car company in favour of him? And there were also rumours, from Jean-Louis Moncet who has been very accurate all through this, that Lotus Racing had lost the backing of Clive Chapman anyway
Fernandes taking the Lotus name is just as much a publicity stunt as Group Lotus - in fact, if I'm honest, I'd say the car company has more of a right to the name than Fernandes because they actually sell Lotus products, while Fernandes is just using the name to gain sponsorship for his team. There's more lineage there back to Chapman himself, if you want to take a historic approach. IMO if the car company want to use the name, then it wouldn't make sense having Team Lotus not promoting Lotus road cars My only worry is that, long term, I don't like the direction Group Lotus is going in under Bahar and I fear they'll be bankrupt in a few years. But that's a separate issue. For now, we're going to have a properly competitive Lotus outfit for the first time in 20 years with a much greater possibility of that 80th win than was ever going to come with Fernandes outfit - they will make progress but I can't ever see them becoming a regular force at the front, while Renault are a former championship-winning team with a top driver leading them and are more likely to stay at the front and compete for podiums and wins And I hope Fernandes doesn't call the team 1Malaysia or Team Air Asia - they would both be ghastly |
||
__________________
F1 fans - over-reacting about everything since forever |
6 Nov 2010, 13:13 (Ref:2785780) | #123 | |||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 1998
Posts: 16,760
|
Quote:
Quote:
and i agree entirely with the second point. it just smacks of "anything you can do i can do better". |
|||
__________________
devils advocate in-chief and professional arguer of both sides |
6 Nov 2010, 13:25 (Ref:2785789) | #124 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,100
|
I tend to agree with you Bella, although I am warmer to Fernandes (yes, we know where he's from, but he is an outstandingly successful businessman that appears to actually care about his team, unlike Richard Branson who appears to have lost interest in Virgin Racing) than the suits in Kuala Lumpur. If Fernandes isn't interfered with by Kuala Lumpur I think he could lead the team onwards to very good things, not in two or three years, but longer term.
|
||
__________________
Marbot : "Ironically, the main difference between a Red Bull and a Virgin is that Red Bull can make parts of its car smaller and floppier." |
6 Nov 2010, 13:45 (Ref:2785803) | #125 | |
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 1998
Posts: 16,760
|
i don't know about you but i'd struggle to name another malaysian company (not proton) or businessman who has done quite such a good job. the comparison with branson is an interesting one - despite the fact tony fernandes has plenty of businesses to play with, just as many as branson, he does indeed see his team as another one of those businesses not just a toy to play with at the weekends and to improve the status of his other businesses. he's a classic fanboy except he actually owns the team not just the tshirt and cap
|
|
__________________
devils advocate in-chief and professional arguer of both sides |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[Team] BBC : Renault lumps for Lotus next year, "Team Lotus" may return | duke_toaster | Formula One | 66 | 17 Sep 2010 20:50 |
Lotus Switxh To Renault Engines | diddy100 | Formula One | 3 | 12 Jul 2010 12:43 |
Team Lotus | Andrew Kitson | Motorsport Art & Photography | 7 | 15 Nov 2004 02:09 |
Team Lotus | angst | Formula One | 8 | 7 Aug 2000 14:35 |
Civil war | ozywoodwards | National & Club Racing | 11 | 3 Aug 2000 09:10 |