|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
18 Mar 2013, 07:49 (Ref:3220380) | #101 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,347
|
I wonder if some people are threatening a breakaway P1 series as leverage to try and get P1 into the United series?
|
||
|
18 Mar 2013, 07:58 (Ref:3220383) | #102 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,569
|
It doesn't really matter if there's a breakway series if nobody signs up for it. I haven't heard any team have a burning desire to stay in LMP1 except for Muscle Milk Racing. I think USCR has enough momentum to keep most of the teams from both current series under its belt too.
|
|
|
18 Mar 2013, 08:47 (Ref:3220393) | #103 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,389
|
No one is going to come out and say they're for it. That's obvious. Don't want to burn your bridges.
|
|
|
18 Mar 2013, 09:20 (Ref:3220418) | #104 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,648
|
I would have put this in the 2014 Fusion Thread, but that is closed, so I think this is the next best place to ask this.
Does anybody know if Greg Pickett was one of the names rumored to try to buy the ALMS? It would make sense since he 1. Spends at least $7.5 million a year to run the HPD 2. Has openly stated his hatred of DPs. 3. Has a ton of money from Muscle Milk 4. Could have used the ALMS to get free brand exposure for Muscle Milk. Such as: The American Le Mans Series presented by Muscle Milk. Then put up Muscle Milk signs all over the tracks. |
|
|
18 Mar 2013, 10:02 (Ref:3220438) | #105 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 8,611
|
|||
__________________
Somebody asked if the McLaren F1 was going to be like the Ferrari F40, Gordon Murray replied, "I don't think so, there's no one at McLaren who can weld that badly." |
18 Mar 2013, 11:06 (Ref:3220468) | #106 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,958
|
|||
|
18 Mar 2013, 15:00 (Ref:3220607) | #107 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,190
|
When you cross over regular consumers of a mc donald's quarter pounder and regular consumers of a $50+ steakhouse piece of beef, you'll see that there is only a ~ 10% cross-over
|
||
|
18 Mar 2013, 19:10 (Ref:3220729) | #108 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,347
|
|||
|
18 Mar 2013, 19:52 (Ref:3220759) | #109 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 5,892
|
Adding weight to P2s would have a significant detrimental impact on reliability, at least in the endurance races, so I don't see that happening. Further modifying the cars to stand up to the increased weight would also be costly to teams, which seems antithetical to the stated aims.
The problem with having the P2s so good in the corners, and DPs so quick on the straights is quite simply; passing happens on the straights (for the mosst part). Unless you're so much better that you can go around the outside, you're not going to be sticking a pass through the middle of a corner. In the end, it's far more sensible, and MUCH less work, to speed up one class, than to slow down and re-balance four others. |
||
__________________
The only certainty is that nothing is certain. |
18 Mar 2013, 22:13 (Ref:3220851) | #110 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,490
|
The concept of a breakaway LMP1-based series is just laughable. I wish that USCR would have P1s next year. However, I can understand USCR's decision.
Let's be honest: privateer LMP1s are a dying breed at the moment. ELMS doesn't have LMP1s anymore. There are exactly two privateer LMP1 cars in WEC for the entire season this year — a privateer LMP1s WEC campaign is a great way to spend a lot of money that means you're effectively battling for fifth unless an Audi or Toyota breaks. There are new LMP1 regs for next year, but at this stage it's very unclear what they will bring. Porsche reentering LMP1 does not make the case for privateer WEC P1 teams any easier. If you're going to a breakaway, if comes later, probably when the economy is stronger, after USCR and FIA/ACO have a major falling out (and thus the ACO/FIA could line up with the new organization), and when a number of GT teams (of whatever type) have grown disillusioned with USCR. (Most likely case: USCR is initially successful enough to start having to split GT and P at a lot of tracks.) Also note that I think it possible that LMP1s could reappear in USCR at some point in the future, if it is successful and attracts addition $$$ to the series and ACO/FIA come up with regs that are more friendly to privateer P1 teams. |
||
|
18 Mar 2013, 22:41 (Ref:3220868) | #111 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,389
|
That's funny you say that- because there were more P1 entries signed up for the ALMS this year than P2 entries. Not until ESM decided to give up on GTE, did P2 actually spring to life.
|
|
|
18 Mar 2013, 23:00 (Ref:3220884) | #112 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 273
|
A lot of posters put down the ACO and French politics, but I don't see ACO political intrigue nearly as bad as what we have today with USCR.
We'll see what this crap looks like at Daytona next year. I'm going with USCR management: ONE CHANCE TO GET IT RIGHT. |
||
__________________
It never got weird enough for me. |
18 Mar 2013, 23:50 (Ref:3220912) | #113 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,919
|
nm
|
||
__________________
Probae esti in segetem sunt deteriorem datae fruges, tamen ipsae suaptae enitent |
19 Mar 2013, 01:32 (Ref:3220936) | #114 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 4,434
|
Now, if Porsche, Toyota, Audi and Oak start selling non-hybrid customer P1 chassis in 2014 ...
|
|
|
19 Mar 2013, 02:25 (Ref:3220954) | #115 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,919
|
Hmm, I do not get 'we're slowing down P-2' out of this.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_obM4VtllQk&t=34m45s L.P. |
||
__________________
Probae esti in segetem sunt deteriorem datae fruges, tamen ipsae suaptae enitent |
19 Mar 2013, 02:42 (Ref:3220962) | #116 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 4,434
|
No one official ever said "slowing P2" and no one ever will officially, even if that is what they do. P2s will be "adjusted" and "modified" to "better balance with the Daytona Prototype class," but never "slowed."
As I have mentioned on one of these sites a couple times, in a one-on-one interview Scott A. all but admitted that for the first two years P2s would have to accept competition-castration rules like DPs, with specified HP and torque curves, and no hot-rodding allowed---but only for the first two years. Even that might change---until I see the printed rules distriburted to competitors, I won't be sure of what the rules will really be, and even then ... waivers. But, at There Veal, Scott A. definitely said P2s would be modified away from ACO regs, but hopefully not so far that they couldn't easily be changed back. Some how I don't think those mods will be to make P2s faster ... |
|
|
19 Mar 2013, 03:09 (Ref:3220971) | #117 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,919
|
Quote:
L.P. |
|||
__________________
Probae esti in segetem sunt deteriorem datae fruges, tamen ipsae suaptae enitent |
19 Mar 2013, 03:19 (Ref:3220977) | #118 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,261
|
Watching The Reveal atm, is it me or is Ed Bennet boring as muck?
|
||
__________________
MBL - SpeedyMouse Race House |
19 Mar 2013, 03:25 (Ref:3220980) | #119 | |
Racer
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 431
|
Ed Bennett is no public speaker, at least not yet.
|
|
|
19 Mar 2013, 03:28 (Ref:3220982) | #120 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,919
|
|||
__________________
Probae esti in segetem sunt deteriorem datae fruges, tamen ipsae suaptae enitent |
19 Mar 2013, 03:42 (Ref:3220988) | #121 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,490
|
|||
|
19 Mar 2013, 19:28 (Ref:3221359) | #122 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,919
|
8Star/Potolicchio bringing on a second Corvette DP and 2 PCs, which with its 2 IMSA lights will give it a complete SportsCar ladder for the USCR.
http://auto-racing.speedtv.com/artic...-expands-to-pc L.P. |
||
__________________
Probae esti in segetem sunt deteriorem datae fruges, tamen ipsae suaptae enitent |
20 Mar 2013, 18:40 (Ref:3221838) | #123 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,919
|
|||
__________________
Probae esti in segetem sunt deteriorem datae fruges, tamen ipsae suaptae enitent |
20 Mar 2013, 21:22 (Ref:3221939) | #124 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,569
|
Quote:
|
||
|
20 Mar 2013, 22:41 (Ref:3221982) | #125 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,767
|
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Series to face axe | AndyF | National & Club Racing | 8 | 6 Aug 2001 11:54 |
Will the BTCC get the axe? | Sodemo2 | Touring Car Racing | 8 | 6 Mar 2001 13:58 |