|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
21 Aug 2007, 09:04 (Ref:1993381) | #51 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,263
|
Most of you are banging on about the Group A era - now I'm not old enough to have followed it, but I have seen a fair bit of 80's BTCC footage on TV - and it's my experience that the races were generally pretty dull. It was a bit too much on the amateur side for my taste, and the points system was just dumb. If you run multiple classes you should have them score seperatly, and if they do score overall, make sure they do so in the order they finish. Not have some little Vauxhall down in the pack take it.
The Super Touring era of the 1990's is by far my favourite one, but the 2001-2006 BTC years are also quite enjoying. I'm not too sure about the Super 2000 rules yet though... |
|
__________________
Michael Delaney was wrong. In between is not waiting - in between is the glory, the passion. In between is what elevates racing. |
21 Aug 2007, 09:55 (Ref:1993425) | #52 | |||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 15,742
|
Quote:
The class structure as far as i'm aware did give points to each class, so that the overall prize was equally as important to the guy in an Escort as it was to the overall race winner in a Rover or 635 or whatever. A manufacturer could run a car in each class theoretically to balance it's chances of the overall title out a bit. The class mix up generally worked well in both modified and standard category saloon car racing. I think it gave lot more variety. The Australians used to think during the Group A era 'it ain't right if a small class car can compete for an overall race win' like we've ended up with in todays 2.0 stuff. The only draw back was if one class was less competitive or dominated by a particular model of car, which ruined it in the last days as to win you either had to have a an RS500 (or in Aus the Skyline), an M3 in the middle class or a Corolla in the baby class. That wasn't supposed to happen and the regs could've been tightened up a bit to stop the turbo/homologation specials killing it off. I actually think Group A would work a belter today. There plenty of hardware around for it or a similar set of regs to work. Manufacturers are more in favour of normally aspirated engines or turbo diesels as opposed to normally aspirated turbos. Therefore we'd get a good range of cars in each class. |
|||
__________________
"Double Kidney Guv'nah?" "No thanks George they're still wavin a white flag!" |
21 Aug 2007, 14:00 (Ref:1993659) | #53 | |||
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 312
|
Quote:
you are listed as "Mussa, I" in 22nd spot, 6th in class. I'll add your first name, is the nationality correct? |
|||
__________________
Frank de Jong |
21 Aug 2007, 16:57 (Ref:1993816) | #54 | ||||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,040
|
Quote:
Quote:
Plus while the BTCC at times didn't really show the full potential of Group A, if you want some great Group A action get your hands on some of the ETCC and ATCC stuff that is out there. And too much on the amateur side for you, Formula One from the same time looks amateurish compared to nowadays Now i loved Group A, but prior to it's adoption in Australia we had a wonderful (but very very poorly policed and administrated) set of touring car rules called Group C (in Europe you had Group A touring cars and Group C sportscars, in Australia we had Group C Touring cars and Group A Sportscars!). Last edited by racer69; 21 Aug 2007 at 16:59. |
||||
__________________
"The Great Race" 22 November 1960 - 21 July 1999 |
22 Aug 2007, 11:08 (Ref:1994413) | #55 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 8,298
|
I dont think the mixed class era was generally consideerd to be that rgeat, I found it very hard toi be prasieworthy of say Chris Hodgetts winning a UK championship in a class where there were only a few cars, versus say Tim Hatvey against numerous simlar cars etc. Same as Europe really.
The late eighties were better with the two classes primarily. But the early 2 litre years wer simply breathtaking for spectacle, manufacturer involvement and sheer excitement. Remember one year you had BMW, Toyota, Honda, Ford, Alfa Romeo, Volvo, Renault, Mazda, Nissan, Mitsubishi and one or two others. Those days WILL NEVER HAPPEN AGAIN in teh current economic climate. OK some of those teams were better funded than otehrs, but you had a superb main series anb an equally superb private series, The modern series is getting better now the cars are filtering through, but the cars are nothing like as nice to look at or watch. |
||
|
22 Aug 2007, 16:44 (Ref:1994604) | #56 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,658
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
23 Aug 2007, 15:27 (Ref:1995175) | #57 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 511
|
Quote:
I had a French competition license in 1986 as I was also running in a French national championship (Coupe de l'Avenir) and you had to have a French license to get points. So really I should have been shown as French. All the best Marcus |
|||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Motorsport's Greatest Touring Car Drivers | krt917 | Touring Car Racing | 40 | 20 Feb 2005 12:52 |
50 Greatest Touring Car Moments | Invincible | Touring Car Racing | 13 | 8 Jan 2005 12:52 |
[DVD/Video] Worlds Greatest Rally Cars DVD | Amaroo Park | Armchair Enthusiast | 7 | 16 Feb 2003 02:05 |
The worlds greatest cars | woodyracing | Road Car Forum | 23 | 25 Nov 2002 09:25 |
2003 Touring cars - what predictions for teams and cars (and colours!!) | adamp_uk | Touring Car Racing | 16 | 17 Oct 2002 20:12 |