|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
View Poll Results: Next year I will (chose the closest most likely option) | |||
Watch live on BBC or Sky depending which it is on. | 36 | 32.73% | |
Watch only BBC live or delayed/highlights. | 48 | 43.64% | |
Watch only BBC live (live or not bother). | 16 | 14.55% | |
Not watch, it is over for me. | 10 | 9.09% | |
Voters: 110. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
31 Jul 2011, 14:23 (Ref:2933975) | #451 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,027
|
Quote:
Corruption in government and at the top of major corporations with international influence is something we should all take seriously. The neutering of the BBC was demanded by James Murdoch in an astonishingly vindictive speech given during the Edinburgh TV festival (see http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009...gh-tv-festival ) Just at this very time our now Prime Minister Cameron, aided by his disgraced press secretary ex- News of the World editor Andy Coulson were cosying up to Murdoch to enlist his media's full editorial support for the forthcoming General Election. Payback came shortly after the election, one of the first thing Cameron's government announced was a freeze on the Licence fee for 5 years and a cut in Foreign office funding for the BBC World Service. Since the BBC is funded by the public and not out of general taxation the only help to deficit reduction was the FO cuts. Moves made out of pure spite but no doubt with full consultation with News Corporation during their numerous "private" meetings with Cameron and Osbourne. James Murdoch, a man currently under investigation for corruption and bribery by the Met Police, the FBI, Parliament and the US Senate is the only winner from this grubby little deal. The viewing Public and the BBC have been well and truly turned over by probably the most disreputable bunch of politicians in living memory. That is what you should be concerned about. |
|||
|
31 Jul 2011, 14:24 (Ref:2933978) | #452 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 42,766
|
Thin edge of the wedge...
The problem is that the outrage here isn't driven by what you describe, it is driven by a load of people who can't watch a motor race in quite as convenient and comprehensive way as before. This situation is mainly driven by realism. The beeb can't afford to spend what others can. However, they have been realistic and managed a decent deal. Is this situation a result of corruption? Nah. IMHO. Fight corruption, yes. Do it here and your attacking the wrong part. IMHO. The selection criteria of this forum misses all those people who, equally selfishly and vindictively as some posting above, will be thrilled at this, but wish it had gone further. For everyone who thinks BBC3 is a waste of time, there is at least another who thinks F1 is a waste of time. Last edited by Adam43; 31 Jul 2011 at 14:34. |
||
__________________
Seriously not taking motorsport too seriously. |
31 Jul 2011, 14:39 (Ref:2933991) | #453 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 42,766
|
See you after the break...
|
||
__________________
Seriously not taking motorsport too seriously. |
31 Jul 2011, 14:53 (Ref:2933993) | #454 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 854
|
F1 Forum - I am sure that Jake Humphrey deliberately went over to see the fans (many were Brits).
"We don't want Sky", said one of them. It's time that the BBC listened to the fans and public opinion, but the deal is done and it's too late. Without the fans as MB said "We could race on a Wednesday behind closed doors" !!! PS. Jake keeps doing it "Since we started coverage in 2009" - I am sure that the three of them are actually very p****d off and I would love to talk to them in private and ask how they really feel about the whole saga. Last edited by Paulaweybridge; 31 Jul 2011 at 15:05. |
|
|
31 Jul 2011, 14:56 (Ref:2933995) | #455 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 46
|
F1 to Sky.
Well Bernie the Godfarther is at it again. Money is the root of all evil and he needs more. As for the BBC they may not have enough in the pot to pay for F1 but they they have enough to pay waste a space Clarkson £2m a year, (Which would you sooner watch) and whats the real story behind no more Turkish GPs after a poor country spends all that money on a GP circuirt ? what will happen to India he doesn't get what he wants from that. Bernie please retire and give us a break.
|
||
|
31 Jul 2011, 14:56 (Ref:2933996) | #456 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 42,766
|
Public opinion probably doesn't reflect this as they are a different set compared to F1 fans. As it is.
|
||
__________________
Seriously not taking motorsport too seriously. |
31 Jul 2011, 14:57 (Ref:2933997) | #457 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 8,885
|
Thanks for the lecture Flavio.
It's precisely because of the wider picture you portray that I can't get over excited about the F1 situation. It is a tiny part of that picture that really very few people care about. In the grand scheme of things, I couldn't really give a toss who broadcasts F1. What I do care about is the poisonous hold over our so called democracy that Murdoch has been allowed to nurture for far too long. And if you believe it is only Cameron and Osbourne who have been drawn far too close to the Murdoch spell you are deeply misguided. (But that's another debate for elsewhere). |
||
__________________
"Never pick a fight with an ugly person, they've got nothing to lose." |
31 Jul 2011, 14:59 (Ref:2933998) | #458 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 8,885
|
P.S. On the subject of what to chop and what to keep on the BBC, given the choice between Clarkson and F1 or BBC4 and F1, I'll keep Clarkson and BBC4 every single time, thanks.
|
||
__________________
"Never pick a fight with an ugly person, they've got nothing to lose." |
31 Jul 2011, 15:00 (Ref:2933999) | #459 | |||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 42,766
|
Quote:
Others do like Top Gear, yet you don't care for that. Top Gear makes money for the beeb, that's why they invest. I'm not having a go, but we have to be careful here. F1 isn't liked by all. |
|||
__________________
Seriously not taking motorsport too seriously. |
31 Jul 2011, 15:04 (Ref:2934001) | #460 | |||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 42,766
|
Quote:
However it isn't and shouldn't be. |
|||
__________________
Seriously not taking motorsport too seriously. |
31 Jul 2011, 15:07 (Ref:2934004) | #461 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,516
|
Quote:
It's liked by enough to justify it still being on Free-to-air TV. The illusion that F1 is not a popular sport is just nonsense. Formula One is one of the BBC's biggest audience shares throughout the year, that in itself should make them prioritise it over other programmes that get lower numbers. The sport mostly going to sky is just going to take away fans. Sky is a slippery slope, I wouldn't be surprised if they get the majority of TV coverage after 2018 and that is what everyone's main worry is. You give them a bit and they will find a way at taking a lot - It's the Murdoch way. |
|||
__________________
my pen will not write on the screen |
31 Jul 2011, 15:09 (Ref:2934005) | #462 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 854
|
Here Here.
I like Clarkson but the salaries paid these days are crazy. Quote:
|
||
|
31 Jul 2011, 15:10 (Ref:2934007) | #463 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 8,885
|
Quote:
Clarkson is an extremely popular presenter and an obvious audience magnet. And when the BBC stops broadcasting the sort of quality programming we get on BBC4 it may as well stop being the publicly funded special case and just respond to the dumbed down market that drives the commercial channels. I am a great defender of the BBC as a whole, for what it does and what it is able to do that the commercial channels won't or can't. Spending outrageous sums of money on sports coverage is a long way from top of that list. |
|||
__________________
"Never pick a fight with an ugly person, they've got nothing to lose." |
31 Jul 2011, 15:11 (Ref:2934008) | #464 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 11,402
|
beau1
Not everything is liked by everybody, and for 145 pounds a year you get an enormous selection at the beeb... |
||
|
31 Jul 2011, 15:16 (Ref:2934012) | #465 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,516
|
I just think dropping the ball on one of your biggest audience share programmes is insane, regardless of how much it costs. You make use of your strengths, not sell them off to another channel whilst Graham Norton etc get a new sunday afternoon programme with his nice big salary or the like.
|
||
__________________
my pen will not write on the screen |
31 Jul 2011, 15:16 (Ref:2934013) | #466 | |||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 42,766
|
That is my point!
Quote:
Apologises, but I find this a blummin' interesting topic. I'm not here for a fight, I'm here to discuss this. Although there is a lot of emotion around here. I love the BBC coverage - they are brilliant. For me it would never move and there is no way sky will do it better. That doesn't mean I have to through away all sense of perspective though. |
|||
__________________
Seriously not taking motorsport too seriously. |
31 Jul 2011, 15:17 (Ref:2934014) | #467 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 854
|
Jake's comments at the end of the forum summed it all up to me.
Passionate enthusiasts like us. |
|
|
31 Jul 2011, 15:18 (Ref:2934015) | #468 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 854
|
||
|
31 Jul 2011, 15:19 (Ref:2934017) | #469 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 42,766
|
|||
__________________
Seriously not taking motorsport too seriously. |
31 Jul 2011, 15:22 (Ref:2934018) | #470 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,516
|
Quote:
At the end of the day my view on the matter is that F1 was massively popular on the BBC and they could have cut costs in so many other ways rather than doing a deal with Sky. |
|||
__________________
my pen will not write on the screen |
31 Jul 2011, 15:23 (Ref:2934019) | #471 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 42,766
|
I've just done that too
|
||
__________________
Seriously not taking motorsport too seriously. |
31 Jul 2011, 15:49 (Ref:2934032) | #472 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 147
|
Wonder if it will go the same way as some of the boxing an football. Where I pay to watch the matches they cover in hd. But then big matches etc they go an put them in box office. Paying once for sport is bad enough. Then shifting it to box office is robbery! Stream Internet I thinks
|
||
|
31 Jul 2011, 15:56 (Ref:2934038) | #473 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 11,402
|
|||
|
31 Jul 2011, 16:18 (Ref:2934059) | #474 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,699
|
Boxing is a good example of what will happen here. Years ago in the days of Ali, Tyson, Cooper even Bugner were household names because of terrestrial TV coverage these days top boxers dont seem nearly as well known I couldnt begin to tell you who was world champ in any class. Also just reading the new regs in Autosport I am wondering if this will be a masterstroke by the Beeb getting out before the whole thing comes tumbling down.
|
||
__________________
You can't polish a turd but you sure can sprinkle it with glitter! |
31 Jul 2011, 16:22 (Ref:2934062) | #475 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 854
|
Hi Jeremy,
I am in the States almost every year and I must admit that the TV is pretty dire. I even prefer Noel Edmonds version of 'Deal or No Deal' to Howie Mandel's Stateside show(which is now finished, of course) whereas our version goes from strength to strength.... Take care |
|
|
Tags |
outrage, sky |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sky Sports is Go............. | Nittymaki | Rallying & Rallycross | 24 | 18 Mar 2006 13:26 |
Sky Sports? | MikeH | ChampCar World Series | 7 | 18 Nov 2002 13:32 |
Sky Sports F1 - the team??? | LucaBadoer | Formula One | 17 | 9 Feb 2002 11:23 |