|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
20 Oct 2013, 08:04 (Ref:3320444) | #226 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,240
|
I agree, I don't think is fair that only duval in audi #2 will receive points. Championship classification is falsified.
|
|
|
20 Oct 2013, 08:34 (Ref:3320451) | #227 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,394
|
Well, bring on Shanghai.
|
|
|
20 Oct 2013, 08:54 (Ref:3320457) | #228 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,999
|
Wow. So glad I didn't stay up for this.
Been scrolling through the thread in line with what I'm watching to avoid spoilers. Got as far as the second red flag but happily I now know not to bother. It's just such a massive shame. I don't think anyone deserves points for this, but on the other hand we did see mistakes from some big teams (Toyota/Aston) and reliability from another (Audi). They shouldn't get off scot-free. Have to admit that in my head I always think of Fuji and rain. In reality that's only because of the Grand Prix in '76 and '07. Weather can take out a race anywhere in the world on any given day and I think the teams know that. Just sad for the fans. |
|
__________________
For when your year runs from June to June - '11/'12/'13/'14/'15/'16/'17/'18/'19/xx/'21/'22/'23 Instagram: rsmotorsportmedia |
20 Oct 2013, 09:11 (Ref:3320465) | #229 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,240
|
rain at fuji is one of the few remeaning motorsport clichè.
|
|
|
20 Oct 2013, 10:12 (Ref:3320483) | #230 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,999
|
Looks like Porsche are the most unhappy about the race being kept off track. Seems like they feel there were periods it would have been okay to race.
Marcel TC has some quotes on his twitter feed: https://twitter.com/dsceuroeditor |
|
__________________
For when your year runs from June to June - '11/'12/'13/'14/'15/'16/'17/'18/'19/xx/'21/'22/'23 Instagram: rsmotorsportmedia |
20 Oct 2013, 11:22 (Ref:3320500) | #231 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,132
|
So, congrats to Audi for having clinched the 2013 World Endurance Manufacturers' Championship. And the 2013 World Endurance Drivers' Championship will be Audi's as well. It will be hard for the #1 trio to catch up, though.
|
||
__________________
In order to finish first, first you have to finish |
20 Oct 2013, 11:51 (Ref:3320510) | #232 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 6,136
|
Quote:
Edit: Full quotes courtesy of endurance-Info |
|||
|
20 Oct 2013, 12:32 (Ref:3320517) | #233 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,857
|
Of course everyone is disappointed that the race could not go ahead properly but there really wasn't any alternative. Ive seen on Twitter and Facebook a few people saying that its a joke series that is scared of the rain and all the associated online rubbish people sprout but the fact is no way could you have let them race with the levels of standing water around.
Would have been interesting to see who would have handled the wet conditions best. |
||
|
20 Oct 2013, 12:45 (Ref:3320521) | #234 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,464
|
I'm happy they did red flag the race rather than see someone get injured.
It's a shame, since it would really have been a good battle in all the classes. But driver safety always come first |
|
|
20 Oct 2013, 13:07 (Ref:3320525) | #235 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,208
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
20 Oct 2013, 13:08 (Ref:3320526) | #236 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 458
|
Quote:
The event earlier this week wasn't caused by anything other than an inexperienced driver. |
|||
|
20 Oct 2013, 13:14 (Ref:3320528) | #237 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,208
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
20 Oct 2013, 13:31 (Ref:3320532) | #238 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,348
|
Quote:
And the point is that criticizing a safety based decision that was pretty much universally supported (except for the one team doing the criticizing), insinuating that a hidden agenda was present, and demanding safety to be compromised for one's own advantage, is in extremely poor taste when we just lost a driver last week. |
||
__________________
When Henry Ford II wanted to kick Enzo Ferrari’s ass he did not instruct his minions to build a Formula 1 car. |
20 Oct 2013, 14:13 (Ref:3320535) | #239 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 458
|
I'll re-phrase my comment above: I believe it was due to an inexperienced driver (or driver error), however it certainly was not the fault of the track or weather.
Maybe Porsche is the only team on the grid that is there to race and not just "travel" . What's wrong with a team wanting to race? Should they be forced to follow what other teams are saying if they don't agree with it? Why couldn't they delay the race until today and actually run? |
||
|
20 Oct 2013, 14:24 (Ref:3320537) | #240 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,827
|
The FIA had to know from '07 that Fuji has dodgy track draining in heavy rain, and they had to know that the forecast didn't look good.
If they weren't confident that the race would go off, why not postpone the race to Monday, where the weather could at least be decent. We may slag off at NASCAR for doing it so often, but if holding a race was impractical, why not? Disappointed for the fans, teams, and the FIA and ACO (if the latter organizations were forced into a box by rules). I mentioned that the race could be in jeopardy because of what happened in '07 under similarly poor conditions. Hallow win for Toyota, hallow WEC clinch for Audi, and probably a sour taste in the WEC's mouth on account of mother nature. I know that a win's a win, but I don't think that Audi wanted their World Championship this way, nor Toyota their race win. I don't know what the FIA plan on doing with driver's points, because even though Duval and Lotterer were the only Audi drivers to drive, I don't think that it's fair for their teammates to get no points for something out of the WEC's control, let alone their control. Nature shouldn't screw McNish or TK out of a drivers' title because Duval was the only guy to drive under the pace car periods. Best solution, possibly, is null and void the race results as an anomaly caused by a freak event, let the results stand and manufacturers' points stand, but void the drivers' points or award half points based on the race running to half distance. I don't know what the FIA can do here aside from that out of fairness. Last edited by chernaudi; 20 Oct 2013 at 14:30. |
||
|
20 Oct 2013, 14:26 (Ref:3320538) | #241 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,348
|
Quote:
Why they couldn't delay the race? To just name a few of the myriad reasons: Track rental, travel arrangements, TV arrangements, Safety arrangements (try telling volunteer marshals that they have to come back on the next day). |
||
__________________
When Henry Ford II wanted to kick Enzo Ferrari’s ass he did not instruct his minions to build a Formula 1 car. |
20 Oct 2013, 14:40 (Ref:3320539) | #242 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,827
|
NASCAR does it all the time, and they don't have races spaced 2-3 weeks apart. Often, their races are spaced only a week apart, and sometimes involves nearly 3000 miles of travel from point A to point B, with both more team personnel and are often paid more than WEC team members are. Delaying the race by one day won't kill most of these guys, considering that some NASCAR or Indy Car teams are rather less awash with money than even private GTE teams.
And of course, in addition to the LMP1 drivers championship, this may screw up other drivers championship battles in LMP2, and both GTE classes. I understand that this is a event of force majure and there was little alternative, but the FIA and ACO need to have contingency plans. Between this and LM, I believe that they need plans for such events. |
||
|
20 Oct 2013, 14:46 (Ref:3320540) | #243 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,269
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
When in doubt? C4. |
20 Oct 2013, 15:02 (Ref:3320545) | #244 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,320
|
The race should be written off in terms of points, staged on Monday as an alternative. To retain points for this fiasco is a complete disaster. The Fuji people need get the drainage sorted if they want their track to remain an international venue. Tough ask, given the potential level of rainfall, but there you go.
|
||
__________________
If I had asked my customer what they wanted, they would've said a faster horse. -Henry Ford |
20 Oct 2013, 15:04 (Ref:3320546) | #245 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 500
|
Spot on. The teams have to pack up all their equipment and cars to be collected in the containers by DHL by Monday. The logistics package is part of the full season entry and the plans cannot be messed about with. There is no flexibility as container ships are full at this time of the year with pre-Christmas stock being exported from China. I would suggest that importing such items as racecars into the People's Republic of China presents more than a few headaches.
|
|
|
20 Oct 2013, 15:14 (Ref:3320550) | #246 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,827
|
Still, it seems that the FIA painted themselves into a box here. There should be better contingency plans than what they're stuck with now. Fuji was basically a disaster.
Sad thing is that the FIA knew from '07 that drainage in heavy rain was an issue, and basically if anything Tike's mods screwed the FIA/ACO, teams and fans more than the rainstorms themselves. I know that heavy fog was an issue, but it was the rain that doomed the event. I believe my comment about the heavy rain pre-race was a sad omen. Audi can't be happy to win the WEC that way, Toyota can't be happy to have won the race that way (which thankfully may've lead to them entering two cars for China reportedly ), and the FIA and ACO can't be happy with the box they got painted in. Fuji is currently on the schedule for next year. Hopefully for Fuji and TMC, that spot isn't provisional, or that they can fix the track's issues for next year. This is the eastern Asia rainy season, after all. |
||
|
20 Oct 2013, 15:20 (Ref:3320554) | #247 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,873
|
I think some people need to have a little nap before they fully comment on what's happened - fans, drivers, media alike.
I'm sorry, but if you had seen the pictures and had any sense, you'd understand that racing just wasn't possible. The conditions were just stupid. Never mind the safety aspect, the conditions were so poor, I don't think the cars could have gone fast enough for it to be called a race. There is a very narrow window within which the WEC can make its visit to Japan, and it seems Fuji is always going to get the nod over Suzuka. Unfortunately, there is this risk from mother nature. That said, Fuji have surely got to take a look at the track's drainage system. Once or twice the rain cleared and we might have been able to go racing, but the track didn't improve as you might expect. |
||
|
20 Oct 2013, 15:41 (Ref:3320559) | #248 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,827
|
That's what I've read and understand. There were windows where racing could've happened, but the track's horrid drainage system shafted the FIA every time.
The fans really got hosed--literally and figuratively. At least everyone acknowledged that and did try and make amends the best that they could Plus for the WEC, but they still shouldn't have been forced into that situation. Maybe with Toyota owning the track and Toyota being in the WEC might force a fix? |
||
|
20 Oct 2013, 15:41 (Ref:3320560) | #249 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,569
|
Is Autopolis certified by the FIA to be able to host LMP1 cars? They could try that circuit for a year, if the weather might be nicer.
|
|
|
20 Oct 2013, 15:56 (Ref:3320563) | #250 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,827
|
Problem is that this is Japan's rainy season and tropical storm season. You can only dodge that bullet so many times no matter where you go.
My big complaint is drainage at Fuji. Was it this bad before the remodel, or did the mods cause the issues, or make them worse? |
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[WEC Race] 2013 FIA WEC - Round 5 - 6 Hours of COTA | Beetle | ACO Regulated Series | 435 | 10 Oct 2013 05:08 |
[WEC Race] 2013 FIA WEC 6 Hours of São Paulo ◦◦◦ RACE THREAD | Beetle | ACO Regulated Series | 502 | 5 Sep 2013 22:10 |
FRC 2013 - WEC Round 3: The 24 Hours of Le Mans | joeb | Predictions Competitions | 31 | 26 Jun 2013 00:32 |
[WEC] OFFICIAL 2013 FIA WEC ENTRY LIST | Bentley03 | ACO Regulated Series | 135 | 15 Feb 2013 09:05 |
[WEC Race] WEC/ALMS Round 1: The 12 Hours of Sebring | joeb | ACO Regulated Series | 1168 | 24 Mar 2012 17:20 |