|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
18 Jun 2012, 19:12 (Ref:3094300) | #1501 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,229
|
Quote:
|
||
|
18 Jun 2012, 19:52 (Ref:3094317) | #1502 | |
Racer
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 152
|
It would be interesting to see how shrouded front wheels, + narrower rear wheels (and hence narrower "upper part" of the wheel arches) and a less restrictive diffuser would compare though wouldn't it....?
|
|
|
18 Jun 2012, 19:55 (Ref:3094321) | #1503 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,409
|
Red Bull 'X-cars' from GT5 anyone?
|
|
|
18 Jun 2012, 20:29 (Ref:3094351) | #1504 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,229
|
|||
|
18 Jun 2012, 22:51 (Ref:3094461) | #1505 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 8,088
|
Quote:
The Toyota came up from miles behind ran under the Delta and then cut across its nose to knock it off. It was just too slow into and through the corners mainly due to the narrow front track and silly little front wheels. |
||
|
18 Jun 2012, 22:57 (Ref:3094464) | #1506 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,229
|
|||
|
18 Jun 2012, 23:15 (Ref:3094470) | #1507 | ||
Team Crouton
20KPINAL
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 39,591
|
|||
|
19 Jun 2012, 03:15 (Ref:3094533) | #1508 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,897
|
I know this is the Delta Wing thread, but maybe there should be another thread titled "Delta Wing Bashing" and then those that are more interested in doing nothing but pursuing personal vendettas can post there? It might help the signal to noise ratio in this thread.
I am not a fan of the car myself, but I would rather participate in a real discussion than to have to wade through repeated snide remarks that really don't add any value. Richard |
|
|
19 Jun 2012, 04:24 (Ref:3094542) | #1509 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 492
|
During the broadcast, the Speed crew mentioned that just the ACO mandated large rear view mirrors added 5% more drag. You can bet there might be a-bit more aero trimming they could do, but adding larger wheels outboard of the chassis would probably produce way more drag than the mirrors.
|
||
|
19 Jun 2012, 04:25 (Ref:3094543) | #1510 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 7,175
|
i cant wait for the spark 1:43
|
||
|
19 Jun 2012, 04:34 (Ref:3094546) | #1511 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 492
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
19 Jun 2012, 04:40 (Ref:3094547) | #1512 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,229
|
Quote:
A field with a mixture of cars that made different trade-offs between corner and straight speed would make for some great racing. |
|||
|
19 Jun 2012, 04:43 (Ref:3094548) | #1513 | ||||
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 492
|
Quote:
Quote:
dh |
||||
|
19 Jun 2012, 07:53 (Ref:3094620) | #1514 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 767
|
Quote:
As for the DW, there is no excuse. Given the Toyota's Hybrid system, he could have waited one more corner--where he could see properly. |
||
|
19 Jun 2012, 09:26 (Ref:3094682) | #1515 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,126
|
Well, wnut does seem to be on some sort of vendetta, since his comments on about page 52 claim the DW design is so bad it will never even get the Le Mans. Since almost every point he stated as a fail there has been proved so completely wrong, he only has this to fall back on.
|
||
__________________
Locost #54 Boldly Leaping where no car has gone before. And then being T-boned. Damn. Survivor of the 2008 2CV 24h!! 2 engines, one accident, 76mph and rain. |
19 Jun 2012, 10:02 (Ref:3094713) | #1516 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,738
|
Another great column by Gordon Kirby that deals with the Delta Wing extensively: http://gordonkirby.com/categories/co..._is_no340.html
The plan is to make the whole car "open source". Very cool. Quote:
|
||
|
19 Jun 2012, 10:10 (Ref:3094721) | #1517 | |
Veteran
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 750
|
yes he should have just slowed down, following the Delta Wing then pass it on a long straight. And every other driver should have done the same if they are unable to see the car properly thats the least they can do.
Last edited by Aysedasi; 19 Jun 2012 at 10:19. |
|
|
19 Jun 2012, 14:10 (Ref:3094865) | #1518 | ||
Race Official
20KPINAL
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 23,283
|
A less restrictive diffuser would be interesting as the D-Wing is ground effect but don't that doesn't eliminate the drag from the front wheels.
|
||
__________________
"If you're not winning you're not trying." Colin Chapman. |
19 Jun 2012, 14:21 (Ref:3094872) | #1519 | |||
Race Official
20KPINAL
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 23,283
|
Quote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YdiUKBymutU |
|||
__________________
"If you're not winning you're not trying." Colin Chapman. |
19 Jun 2012, 14:36 (Ref:3094878) | #1520 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 767
|
Quote:
From the TV, it looks like they were all bunched up--with DW letting the P1 cars through--before the Toyota decided to try to pass the whole bunch of them and put the DW out of the race. He simply drove him off the track. It is inconceivable to think he didn't see the DW. Had a P2 been on the same piece of road as the DW, the same thing would have happened. hmmm. I guess you don't like DW. Pretty soon you will be telling us that the DW hit the Toyota! |
||
|
19 Jun 2012, 14:37 (Ref:3094881) | #1521 | |
Racer
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 431
|
Apparently people are too ticked off about the Deltawing being "The Future™". Well, the future can be anything, really. Even Motoyama said it:"We have really shown what the future of sportscar racing could look like–ultra efficient..."
Emphasis on COULD. It can happen, it cannot. We'll just have to wait and see. |
|
|
19 Jun 2012, 15:12 (Ref:3094897) | #1522 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,711
|
|||
__________________
It's great to be here! |
19 Jun 2012, 15:31 (Ref:3094906) | #1523 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 4,434
|
Re; Open Source---That had always been part of the plan; DWing LLc reserved the right to approve or reject any suggested design changes, and then would publish those as well. (From the Kirby article: "Having the complete design effectively on a plate means you can also modify the design and submit your design for approval. " (Emphasis added.))
That was (I beleive) a large part of the reason it was originally rejected by IndyCar--IndyCar would have lost all control over the design, and teams wouldn't bother trying to improve it legally) because they would have to share all their development with their rivals. So the league would have to give up control over the car design (thus losing the ability to make the kinds of downforce changed it made at the last two oval races, which made those races so much better and safer) and the teams would have no reason to try to improve the car legally, which would have led to more cheating and less progress. The question remains, even if it is "Open Source," who owns the rights to "DeltaWing LLC-Approved" changes to the design, or if that part of the system is even practical now. Either way, the ideas are out there. Any engineers who want to be really creative in designing a car which might not be able to race anywhere is free to make his or her own. (Oh, and TY for the link.) Last edited by Maelochs; 19 Jun 2012 at 15:38. |
|
|
19 Jun 2012, 16:31 (Ref:3094941) | #1524 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,229
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
19 Jun 2012, 16:36 (Ref:3094945) | #1525 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 4,755
|
It really sucks that this car got punted out by Whackajima. Alot of people wanted to see this car finish. Obviously not a certain other japanese manufacturer
just kidding about the toyota joke haha. but yeah i wanted to see the car finish. |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Wide Front Wing / Narrow rear wing | browney | Formula One | 30 | 21 Nov 2011 12:13 |
Delta S4's that were in Rallycross | M.Lowe | Rallying & Rallycross | 23 | 30 Aug 2007 11:47 |
Delta wing , inverted delta wing | effuno | Racing Technology | 3 | 8 Apr 2007 13:45 |