|
| Site Partners: | SpotterGuides | Veloce Books |
| Related Sites: | Your Link Here |
|
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
|
19 Nov 2012, 01:40 (Ref:3168242)
|
#11 | |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 4,434
  |
I think Audi went with AWD because they wanted AWD-0--they assumed it would be an advantage on most tracks, and weren't expecting to be beat out of so many slow corners.
When the R18 was designed the only opponent was Peugeot, whose Hybrid was also AWD. I am not sure if it was also easier to balance the car with the front wheels carrying the extra motors as opposed to the rear, but if Toyota could do it I have to think Audi could have also. I f I were not busy and lazy i would look up some real info but for now---I don't recall anything but AWD being a factor. |
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| [WEC] Porsche Prototype Discussion | Simmi | North American Racing | 9260 | 5 Mar 2024 20:32 |
| [WEC] Toyota LMP1 Discussion | Gingers4Justice | ACO Regulated Series | 6771 | 18 Aug 2020 09:37 |
| Nissan LMP1 Discussion | Gingers4Justice | Sportscar & GT Racing | 5568 | 17 Feb 2016 23:22 |
| How about a LMP1 Pro & LMP1 Privateer class | Holt | Sportscar & GT Racing | 35 | 6 Jun 2012 13:44 |
| [LM24 Race] Audi LMP1 Poster all art deco'd. | blackohio | ACO Regulated Series | 2 | 27 Oct 2011 06:30 |
Threaded Mode