|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
11 Jul 2013, 11:38 (Ref:3276553) | #3726 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 613
|
|||
|
11 Jul 2013, 12:08 (Ref:3276560) | #3727 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,042
|
Quote:
I understand that committing to a U sportscar series is usually dependent upon sponsors who are mainly interested in the big races. Daytona, Sebring, possibly PLM and Watkins Glen 6 Hours and at a stretch Indianapolis and Laguna Seca, are the 'bigger' races on the schedules, so the season long entrants want to be seen to perform at those races. The problem comes in because the series owns the event (OK, it originally started the other way around) and doesn't want to diminish the perceived value of the series' entrants by taking away their ability to be the "Winners of Sebring/Daytona/etc". Put simply, the 'little' guys want to win the 'big' events, so refuse to commit to the smaller races that comprise a series if competition arises, and the 'big' don't want to spend on the 'little' events. That sound about right? |
|||
__________________
Eat Sportscars Sleep Sportscars Drink Gulf |
11 Jul 2013, 12:36 (Ref:3276569) | #3728 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,347
|
Why not then leave Daytona as the little teams big event and let P1 run at PLM,Sebring and then add one new race at somewhere like Montreal
|
||
|
11 Jul 2013, 12:43 (Ref:3276572) | #3729 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,203
|
Quote:
The question is, if there is so much genuine interest from manufacturers (and teams able and willing) to race P1 cars in the US, as in enough interest to overcome the difficulty of starting a brand a new series from scratch and getting into struggle with the behemoth organisation that NASCAR is, then why would NASCAR consider this interest and turn down such an opportunity in the first place? They may be loyal enough to their DP owners to screw ALMS teams, but I doubt they would turn down the opportunity to have their own US-bound WEC with all the bells and whistles. I find it hard that such interest emerged out of nowhere just recently when it was already too late for USCR to reconsider its class structure. This makes me think that the whole story is simply there to be used in some kind of negotiation between USCR and some interested party(ies). |
|||
|
11 Jul 2013, 12:51 (Ref:3276574) | #3730 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 1,250
|
Quote:
USCR could be LMP1, LMP2, GTLM, GTD. Sounds good to me! |
||
|
11 Jul 2013, 13:22 (Ref:3276585) | #3731 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,871
|
I feel like this is more an attempt at honest journalism and reporting than "I know something but have been instructed to keep my mouth shut." It would be fantastic if rumors were so true that people reporting on the sport knew a few specific pieces of information, but the pessimist inside of me says nay.
|
||
|
11 Jul 2013, 13:45 (Ref:3276595) | #3732 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 15,703
|
If these rumors turn out to be true it would be the death blow for any chance of a US DTM series. Not that that would upset me.....
|
||
|
11 Jul 2013, 13:49 (Ref:3276599) | #3733 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,648
|
Quote:
Could be, but also keep in mind that everyone kept quiet about ESM trying to run P2 cars last October/November, because they didn't want to disrupt any deals or funding. |
||
|
11 Jul 2013, 14:11 (Ref:3276612) | #3734 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,958
|
Quote:
If there was nothing to this rumour, he would say, I've heard the rumour, don't know anything about it, or dismiss it somehow. That would be the honest journalism answer... not to suggest he is being dishonest at all. He is refusing to talk about it, and there is only one reason to do that. |
|||
|
11 Jul 2013, 14:38 (Ref:3276621) | #3735 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,648
|
IF this series happens (and it is a monster IF), they are going to have to get Audi, Toyota, Honda, and Porsche to commit to a 3-year deal with 2 cars per team at every race so the series can get some long term stability.
|
|
|
11 Jul 2013, 14:47 (Ref:3276626) | #3736 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 4,434
|
And which privateers would run in this series, knowing they would never get close to the podium---even if these factories all sold customer cars, unless they also provided the engineering crews and shared info from the factory teams, privateers would be racing for ninth and tenth.
Hard to get sponsorship knowing from the start you'd always finish last. |
|
|
11 Jul 2013, 15:05 (Ref:3276629) | #3737 | |
Racer
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 409
|
On the John Dagy tweet,
for him to tweet back..there is something to the P1 rumor or otherwise he wouldn't reply to the tweet! |
|
|
11 Jul 2013, 15:24 (Ref:3276635) | #3738 | |
Rookie
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 7
|
Just don't see those teams leaving WEC (Lemans) to come race in the US. Audi didn't think ALMS was worth it, why should they now? Sebring is no longer welcoming them in a P1. Toyota is already in Nascar and didn't care to race at Sebring when they were welcome!
This must be one of the best kept secrets in sportscars! |
|
|
11 Jul 2013, 15:30 (Ref:3276638) | #3739 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,630
|
What I want to know is why didn't all of these folks speak up in the last few years and let people know that they wanted to run P1s in the US. If that had been the case we wouldn't have had the end of the ALMS and we wouldn't be going through all of these goofy conniptions with trying to ballance DPs and P2, USCR, etc. etc. The whole reason ALMS went under was the lack of good competition at the top of the food chain and now that it is dead and buried here they all come wanting to compete in P1 in the US and now we have to create a new series to accommodate them. Seem really strange to me.
DK |
||
|
11 Jul 2013, 15:34 (Ref:3276639) | #3740 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,209
|
Quote:
|
||
|
11 Jul 2013, 15:36 (Ref:3276640) | #3741 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,648
|
I wonder if this P1 stuff is what is slowing up the USCR rules and announcements?
|
|
|
11 Jul 2013, 15:36 (Ref:3276641) | #3742 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,630
|
|||
|
11 Jul 2013, 15:52 (Ref:3276645) | #3743 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,958
|
Quote:
Porsche seems to be the leader on this, and they didn't have a P1 car to race previously. HPD has always been interested, but only if there was competition. Audi had issues with the ALMS themselves. There had been talk within the GT ranks about another series as well. Toyota Japan/AG haven't had enough of a budget to race here, maybe Toyota NA has an interest... or not. ---------- Nobody would leave the WEC to race in such a series, the entrants would come out of the North American/US marketing budgets. I too am sceptical of this. My guess is the whole DTM thing was at the push of Audi, who wanted somewhere to race for overalls, that wasn't the ALMS. Now that Porsche is building a P1, and Audi has one... they are both interested in competing for overall victories. It will be interesting to see how this all plays out, "if" there is anything to it. As far as a schedule... take a look at Indycar, and add a couple from there. Ganassi... he's a businessman. If someone wants to pay him to race in X... that is likely what he'll do. |
|||
|
11 Jul 2013, 16:08 (Ref:3276652) | #3744 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,630
|
Quote:
DK |
|||
|
11 Jul 2013, 16:18 (Ref:3276653) | #3745 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,109
|
So much speculation and ideas. I guess what could be done is have a series with LMP1 as the main class and then come to an agreement with the SCCA to have its GT3 class come in and be in the field as well. As we know there is room for the GT3 platform in the USA too. That can be used to the advantage of the folks who want a breakaway P1 series as well.
|
|
|
11 Jul 2013, 17:07 (Ref:3276677) | #3746 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,958
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
11 Jul 2013, 22:08 (Ref:3276786) | #3747 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,396
|
I can see it happening. If the manufacturers push for it. This is North America, and I know this is Toyota's biggest hybrid market. Porsche is huge here as well, and Audi. HPD is in America on top of it. Like the rumors of TRD USA interested in a P2 for USCR, I wouldnt be surprised to see a p1 interest if there was a place to run it. This hopefully expands and serious talks get underway. The twitter/facebook age we live in allows us to express our wishes and these companies realize this. They do pay attention so get your word out!
|
|
|
12 Jul 2013, 00:41 (Ref:3276833) | #3748 | |
Racer
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 258
|
||
|
12 Jul 2013, 04:45 (Ref:3276868) | #3749 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 2,143
|
If this new p1 series were to follow indycar.....I wouldn't mind a p1/indycar weekend at laguna.that I would empty my wallet for! I've been missing open wheelers at laguna for a long time now
|
||
__________________
RACE CAR: noun: an automobile built or modified for racing. |
12 Jul 2013, 04:56 (Ref:3276869) | #3750 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,793
|
Whether this will come to pass is still anyone's guess, but I think where there's smoke there is liable to be some fire...how much and how persistent is the question. There've been rumblings about this for months, and not for nothing, because the reason for interest (which is a very different thing from commitment corporately speaking) is obvious. We have 3-4 manufacturers (depending on what the nature of the incipient HPD program is) who are producing cars with only one place to run them, one that has very little exposure in a very very important market.
The question then is how much money Audi, Porsche and Honda (and Toyota?) might be able to put up, especially if it comes largely from NA divisions - though the value of NA exposure could be worth a little bit to parent companies. That's probably the ONLY question. If the factories pay, then putting on a series is the easy bit. Sure, making a really good series is a little harder, but money solves most problems handily. Remember the glory days of the 07/08 ALMS were brought to you with substantial financial input from what manufacturers, again? |
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[LM24] 2014 Le Mans Entry Rumours | The Badger | 24 Heures du Mans | 47 | 30 Sep 2013 22:04 |
Rumours more rumours! | crazytrain | ChampCar World Series | 11 | 7 Oct 2002 17:06 |
[LM24] Le Mans Series and Sportscar Racer | Speedworx | 24 Heures du Mans | 20 | 6 Feb 2002 03:55 |
log-in repetition | Unregistered | Announcements and Feedback | 6 | 10 Apr 2001 17:26 |
Repetition... | Chris Y | Touring Car Racing | 6 | 20 Mar 2001 14:33 |