|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
24 Feb 2010, 11:46 (Ref:2639638) | #1 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,742
|
Fantasy F1 2010 - rules suggestions
Greetings fellow forumers. I am in the process of taking the reins of Fantasy F1 from the great Baron Ralf von Fan and I need your help
I do know how these things work but 1) I've never run one before and 2) I've not paid much attention to the one here up until now. So I don't know what the common consensus is on what is wanted and what isn't wanted At the moment, I'm busy compiling the rules. I'm planning on making a couple of changes: - As a result of the grid expansion, I am proposing an increase from 1 car selection to 2. These would not have to be different cars - you could pick 2 from the same constructor - but then the whole reason I'm adding this is because we have a bigger grid with effectively 3 tiers. I think it would add a bit more intrigue. The points and prices will be adjusted accordingly - I was also considering adding a "reserve" driver, where you would pick a 3rd driver at half the cost but he would score you half points. But I'm not convinced - seems a bit complicated to try and implement. Currently leaving it out unless there is sufficient demand - Also, I am altering the points system, again to account for changes in F1 - more points on offer, a different structure and some more bonuses for the drivers (pole, fastest lap, leading a lap and laps led, to be precise). Just adds another little curveball Any good? And is there anything you would like to see? I will be looking to post the rules and entry thread within the next couple of days, as there is now less than 3 weeks to go until the first race |
||
__________________
F1 fans - over-reacting about everything since forever |
24 Feb 2010, 14:42 (Ref:2639753) | #2 | ||||||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,527
|
Quote:
Quote:
Score points for top finishing example of your engine, lose points for each blow up. Quote:
Quote:
Thanks for taking on the challenge. |
||||||
__________________
There's an old F1 adage, 'If you want to finish first, first you have to be a duplicitous little moaning git' |
24 Feb 2010, 14:58 (Ref:2639762) | #3 | |||||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,742
|
Quote:
The reason behind 2 constructors is we have a much bigger grid this year and inevitably people are going to go for the bigger teams and leave the likes of Lotus and Virgin out. 2 cars would mean that some may gamble on a smaller team alongside a bigger team, or balance it out with 2 average cars like the Williams or Force India. It's like the drivers, essentially, only you can't pick the same driver twice Quote:
Quote:
Cheers |
|||||
__________________
F1 fans - over-reacting about everything since forever |
24 Feb 2010, 21:41 (Ref:2639994) | #4 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,365
|
I am a little wary of the second car rule.... I think an engine would be a better idea. Don't worry about replacment engines. You can choosea car and an engine. If the engine is different from the one in the car it effectively becomes your other option.
If you are going to do the fastest lap, pole, most laps, bonuses its a lot of extra work, Thanks for doing it. You're a brave man..... |
|
|
24 Feb 2010, 21:55 (Ref:2640012) | #5 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,742
|
It's not that much, really. I've been playing around in Excel tonight and it's easily doable - once it's set up, it's not much on top. I can get all the info off Forix
As for the engines...I think I may go for it |
||
__________________
F1 fans - over-reacting about everything since forever |
24 Feb 2010, 22:01 (Ref:2640020) | #6 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,527
|
Bear in mind about engines - f1.com results will show a DNF reason & that should be the only time an engine loses points for you (although, thinking about it a BIG penalty for each driver that goes over his 6 engine limit would make the final quarter of the season more nail-bighting - normally in Fantasy F1 the top teams after the first 1/2 season just carry on winning big)
Another couple of ideas to throw out there: Bonus point(s)for car/engine that has the top speed trap recording. Bonus point(s)for the 10/10ths driver of the day. Bonus point(s) for new lap record - where it is not a new track, obviously. For the 3rd driver - how about limiting my original suggestion to announced test/reserve drivers & giving them knock down prices? Oh & I have always liked the idea of each fantasy team having a "joker" race (declared along with their entry) where they score double. One thing I didn't like in the past was losing points for a DNF against a driver when it was the car's fault (or indeed vice, versa) - I would either not have minus points, or take the F1.com official reason for retirement & dock points from driver/car according to what the reason was. |
||
__________________
There's an old F1 adage, 'If you want to finish first, first you have to be a duplicitous little moaning git' |
24 Feb 2010, 22:16 (Ref:2640033) | #7 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,742
|
OK
- Engines are in, 2nd cars out. Engine failures will be defined either by official records or by my own decision if it's contentious - an engine failure for an engine will be worth more than a normal retirement for a constructor. If the engine supplier goes over the engine number limit, there will be penalties applied. Best 3 scores will count for the engines - I'll leave reserve drivers out for now but it's something we can work on for next year - Joker races is a bit too pot luck, I think - Drivers don't lose points through DNFs, anyway. They just get nothing. Only constructor (and now engine) points are deducted for DNFs |
||
__________________
F1 fans - over-reacting about everything since forever |
24 Feb 2010, 22:51 (Ref:2640054) | #8 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,742
|
OK, here's a short sample of the rulebook (the actual rules post will be bigger):
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
F1 fans - over-reacting about everything since forever |
24 Feb 2010, 23:02 (Ref:2640058) | #9 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,527
|
RULESWho is in charge? I am.
A healthy dose of megalomania is always required to run this sort of thing On that note - can I suggest that any "I think driver X should be worth more" type suggestions are not listened to; you will never get an agreement on those details. One question I can see that needs clarifying - if I pick my Chassis as Mclaren & it DNFs because of an engine blow up, do I lose points? And just a thought, to avoid pit stoppery giving drivers undue laps led points - how about making it "lead 5 consecutive laps = 1 point" or something along those line. |
||
__________________
There's an old F1 adage, 'If you want to finish first, first you have to be a duplicitous little moaning git' |
24 Feb 2010, 23:04 (Ref:2640060) | #10 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,527
|
|||
__________________
There's an old F1 adage, 'If you want to finish first, first you have to be a duplicitous little moaning git' |
24 Feb 2010, 23:15 (Ref:2640070) | #11 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,912
|
I would suggest you actually keep it simple and continue what has previously been done for this year, then modify next year... but It looks the goods if you want to change the system.
|
||
__________________
Contrary to popular opinion, I do have mechanical sympathy, I always feel sorry for the cars I drive. |
24 Feb 2010, 23:57 (Ref:2640091) | #12 | |||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,709
|
Quote:
He crossed the line in the lead 4 times in succession but then pulled into the pits, with the car in second crossing the timing line before he does as he's first or second garage, and the timing line is half way down the pitlane. He deserves a point. I think jab had it right, 3 points for crossing the finish line in the lead most often, and a point for anyone else that through luck or judgement crossed the line in the lead at any other point in the race. |
|||
|
25 Feb 2010, 00:20 (Ref:2640103) | #13 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,306
|
Can i choose the safety car driver?
|
||
|
25 Feb 2010, 09:00 (Ref:2640199) | #14 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,742
|
Yes. It's anything as long as it's not the driver's fault, because the car design is invariably going to have an impact on the engine (yes, I'm talking about you, Adrian Newey)
|
||
__________________
F1 fans - over-reacting about everything since forever |
25 Feb 2010, 09:23 (Ref:2640210) | #15 | ||
Llama Assassin and Sheep Botherer
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,212
|
Lets cut to the chase,do you take bribes?.
Team name: Sheep Botherers Constructor: Force India - 12,000 Engine:Mercedes - 25,000 Driver 1: Sebastian Vettel - 50,000 Driver 2:Timo Glock - 10,000 (97,000) |
||
|
25 Feb 2010, 09:31 (Ref:2640214) | #16 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,742
|
I'll open the entry thread in a minute
I'm not sure on the constructor-engine combinations, though. I've written in the rules above not to have the realistic combinations (i.e. you can't have a Mercedes chassis and engine, or a Red Bull chassis and a Renault engine), but I think I'll get rid of it as it is too restrictive. I'll leave it out for now |
||
__________________
F1 fans - over-reacting about everything since forever |
25 Feb 2010, 22:06 (Ref:2640584) | #17 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,742
|
As a final addition for this year, would anyone approve of/object to a points bonus for the entrant who scores the most points for winning a race? I was thinking not much, about 3 points
|
||
__________________
F1 fans - over-reacting about everything since forever |
26 Feb 2010, 16:29 (Ref:2641009) | #18 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,742
|
As no one has objected, I guess I'm OK to add that in
3 points for the entry that scores the most point during a race I'm also archiving previous years' results, which will mean I can award a Rookie of the Year Prize, which, funnily enough, I will be up for, and a Veterans Prize for those that have competed in at least 2 previous championships Last edited by jab; 26 Feb 2010 at 16:56. |
||
__________________
F1 fans - over-reacting about everything since forever |
2 Mar 2010, 21:22 (Ref:2643603) | #19 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,742
|
Received a question tonight on the scoring for the engines, due to the nature of the engine suppliers supplying different numbers of cars (Ferrari 6, Renault 4, Mercedes 6 and Cosworth 6-8)
Just to clarify, the scores that count are from the top 3 cars with those engines in, plus deducted points for engine failures during the race e.g - If Webber finishes 1st, Vettel 2nd, Kubica 4th and Petrov 15th, only the scores for 1st, 2nd and 4th count - If Petrov retires due to engine failure, the scores for 1st, 2nd and 4th count but also there is a points deduction for the engine failure I apologise if anyone's gone for Cosworth thinking it's a bargain when they are supplying more cars than everyone else... Also given that US F1 is pretty much dead, await further news on the entry list situation. An official entry list is due out tomorrow. I have had a contigency in place as far as prices go for Stefan GP since the beginning just in case they get in, although it looks unlikely. All entries including Campos will automatically be converted to Hispania (or whatever they choose to call the team) |
||
__________________
F1 fans - over-reacting about everything since forever |
4 Mar 2010, 00:37 (Ref:2644501) | #20 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,912
|
I did but not because I thought I had 8 scorers, more because I thought there is no way I could have 3/5 failures. Especially considering it is more likely that the Cosworth Teams are less likely to finish (the same could be said with anyone other than Renault power, though they have less back markers).
Can't really change my entry, because I have spent my money, so I would need to do multiple changes, and over all I would only go to the Renault, which means a change away from Red Bull, which and I would need to drop 5k on my second driver, and someone may have that combo... which is all too hard! But to clarify an engine failure during the race is only counted where the official results list "Engine" not where we see that an engine "looks" like it has gone |
||
__________________
Contrary to popular opinion, I do have mechanical sympathy, I always feel sorry for the cars I drive. |
4 Mar 2010, 09:13 (Ref:2644661) | #21 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,742
|
|||
__________________
F1 fans - over-reacting about everything since forever |
4 Mar 2010, 16:26 (Ref:2644919) | #22 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,742
|
Again, another clarification - Chandhok is still worth 5,000, if anyone wants to take a gamble on him
|
||
__________________
F1 fans - over-reacting about everything since forever |
6 Apr 2010, 08:15 (Ref:2667472) | #23 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,217
|
Chandhok looking reasonable value now.
Last edited by Splatz the Cow; 6 Apr 2010 at 08:16. Reason: spulling |
||
|
22 Jun 2010, 12:16 (Ref:2716300) | #24 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,742
|
Rule clarification:
Whilst working out the results (yes, this is actually happening), I've noticed there are a few instances where drivers haven't finished due to a mechanical failure of some kind but are still classified. Mechanical DNFs usually mean -3 points for constructors points. However, if they are classified, there will be no minus constructors points, but if it's an engine failure and they're still classified (see Alonso in Malaysia, or Liuzzi in Spain), that will still mean -5 on the engine points However, I'm willing to change this if it was different before and people want to keep it that way |
||
__________________
F1 fans - over-reacting about everything since forever |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[DTM] Rules frozen for 2010 season | JMeissner | Touring Car Racing | 4 | 7 Aug 2009 09:08 |
Constructive suggestions from the Silverstone F1 weekend | deadsquirrel | Marshals Forum | 102 | 18 Jul 2007 15:54 |
Suggestions on the future of F1 | Stargazer7 | Formula One | 18 | 25 Aug 2005 03:59 |