Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Single Seater Racing > Formula One > Predictions Contest & Fun

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 24 Feb 2010, 11:46 (Ref:2639638)   #1
jab
Veteran
 
jab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Wales
South Wales/Coventry
Posts: 4,742
jab should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridjab should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridjab should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Fantasy F1 2010 - rules suggestions

Greetings fellow forumers. I am in the process of taking the reins of Fantasy F1 from the great Baron Ralf von Fan and I need your help

I do know how these things work but 1) I've never run one before and 2) I've not paid much attention to the one here up until now. So I don't know what the common consensus is on what is wanted and what isn't wanted

At the moment, I'm busy compiling the rules. I'm planning on making a couple of changes:

- As a result of the grid expansion, I am proposing an increase from 1 car selection to 2. These would not have to be different cars - you could pick 2 from the same constructor - but then the whole reason I'm adding this is because we have a bigger grid with effectively 3 tiers. I think it would add a bit more intrigue. The points and prices will be adjusted accordingly

- I was also considering adding a "reserve" driver, where you would pick a 3rd driver at half the cost but he would score you half points. But I'm not convinced - seems a bit complicated to try and implement. Currently leaving it out unless there is sufficient demand

- Also, I am altering the points system, again to account for changes in F1 - more points on offer, a different structure and some more bonuses for the drivers (pole, fastest lap, leading a lap and laps led, to be precise). Just adds another little curveball

Any good?

And is there anything you would like to see?

I will be looking to post the rules and entry thread within the next couple of days, as there is now less than 3 weeks to go until the first race
jab is offline  
__________________
F1 fans - over-reacting about everything since forever
Quote
Old 24 Feb 2010, 14:42 (Ref:2639753)   #2
courageous
Veteran
 
courageous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
United Kingdom
Chatham, Kent
Posts: 1,527
courageous should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridcourageous should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by jab View Post
Greetings fellow forumers. I am in the process of taking the reins of Fantasy F1 from the great Baron Ralf von Fan and I need your help

I do know how these things work but 1) I've never run one before and 2) I've not paid much attention to the one here up until now. So I don't know what the common consensus is on what is wanted and what isn't wanted
Good luck - it can be fun (if a bit of hard work) running one.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jab View Post
- As a result of the grid expansion, I am proposing an increase from 1 car selection to 2. These would not have to be different cars - you could pick 2 from the same constructor - but then the whole reason I'm adding this is because we have a bigger grid with effectively 3 tiers. I think it would add a bit more intrigue. The points and prices will be adjusted accordingly
Rather than a 2nd constructor, I think choosing an engine would make more sense.
Score points for top finishing example of your engine, lose points for each blow up.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jab View Post
- I was also considering adding a "reserve" driver, where you would pick a 3rd driver at half the cost but he would score you half points. But I'm not convinced - seems a bit complicated to try and implement. Currently leaving it out unless there is sufficient demand
Have the 3rd driver rule be "any driver not currently driving in F1" & have it at no cost - if at some point in the season he gets called up them any team who picked him will score points for him (I like the 1/2 points idea - avoids the risk of somebody scoring heavily with 3 drivers)

Quote:
Originally Posted by jab View Post
- Also, I am altering the points system, again to account for changes in F1 - more points on offer, a different structure and some more bonuses for the drivers (pole, fastest lap, leading a lap and laps led, to be precise). Just adds another little curveball
Make it a very small bonus for leading laps - things like that can skew the results very easily.


Thanks for taking on the challenge.
courageous is offline  
__________________
There's an old F1 adage, 'If you want to finish first, first you have to be a duplicitous little moaning git'
Quote
Old 24 Feb 2010, 14:58 (Ref:2639762)   #3
jab
Veteran
 
jab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Wales
South Wales/Coventry
Posts: 4,742
jab should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridjab should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridjab should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by courageous View Post
Rather than a 2nd constructor, I think choosing an engine would make more sense.
Score points for top finishing example of your engine, lose points for each blow up.
I was thinking about including engines as I've seen it done elsewhere. But how often do you hear of engine failures these days? What classifies as an engine failure? And I don't particularly want to be scratching around trying to find out who's changed an engine before each race

The reason behind 2 constructors is we have a much bigger grid this year and inevitably people are going to go for the bigger teams and leave the likes of Lotus and Virgin out. 2 cars would mean that some may gamble on a smaller team alongside a bigger team, or balance it out with 2 average cars like the Williams or Force India. It's like the drivers, essentially, only you can't pick the same driver twice

Quote:
Originally Posted by courageous View Post
Have the 3rd driver rule be "any driver not currently driving in F1" & have it at no cost - if at some point in the season he gets called up them any team who picked him will score points for him (I like the 1/2 points idea - avoids the risk of somebody scoring heavily with 3 drivers)
I don't think picking someone from outside F1 would be particularly useful, because it can be pot luck in a lot of occasions. I know the year before last no outside drivers came in all season

Quote:
Originally Posted by courageous View Post
Make it a very small bonus for leading laps - things like that can skew the results very easily.
It'll only be a point, which is pretty insignificant, but just something to spice things up. 3 for leading the most laps, along with pole and fastest lap. That way if a driver has a mega weekend and yet ends up retiring right at the end (see Massa in Hungary in 2008), whoever picked him still gets a decent points haul

Cheers
jab is offline  
__________________
F1 fans - over-reacting about everything since forever
Quote
Old 24 Feb 2010, 21:41 (Ref:2639994)   #4
Teretonga
Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,365
Teretonga is going for a new world record!Teretonga is going for a new world record!Teretonga is going for a new world record!Teretonga is going for a new world record!Teretonga is going for a new world record!Teretonga is going for a new world record!Teretonga is going for a new world record!Teretonga is going for a new world record!
I am a little wary of the second car rule.... I think an engine would be a better idea. Don't worry about replacment engines. You can choosea car and an engine. If the engine is different from the one in the car it effectively becomes your other option.

If you are going to do the fastest lap, pole, most laps, bonuses its a lot of extra work,
Thanks for doing it. You're a brave man.....
Teretonga is offline  
Quote
Old 24 Feb 2010, 21:55 (Ref:2640012)   #5
jab
Veteran
 
jab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Wales
South Wales/Coventry
Posts: 4,742
jab should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridjab should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridjab should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
It's not that much, really. I've been playing around in Excel tonight and it's easily doable - once it's set up, it's not much on top. I can get all the info off Forix

As for the engines...I think I may go for it
jab is offline  
__________________
F1 fans - over-reacting about everything since forever
Quote
Old 24 Feb 2010, 22:01 (Ref:2640020)   #6
courageous
Veteran
 
courageous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
United Kingdom
Chatham, Kent
Posts: 1,527
courageous should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridcourageous should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Bear in mind about engines - f1.com results will show a DNF reason & that should be the only time an engine loses points for you (although, thinking about it a BIG penalty for each driver that goes over his 6 engine limit would make the final quarter of the season more nail-bighting - normally in Fantasy F1 the top teams after the first 1/2 season just carry on winning big)

Another couple of ideas to throw out there:

Bonus point(s)for car/engine that has the top speed trap recording.
Bonus point(s)for the 10/10ths driver of the day.
Bonus point(s) for new lap record - where it is not a new track, obviously.

For the 3rd driver - how about limiting my original suggestion to announced test/reserve drivers & giving them knock down prices?

Oh & I have always liked the idea of each fantasy team having a "joker" race (declared along with their entry) where they score double.

One thing I didn't like in the past was losing points for a DNF against a driver when it was the car's fault (or indeed vice, versa) - I would either not have minus points, or take the F1.com official reason for retirement & dock points from driver/car according to what the reason was.
courageous is offline  
__________________
There's an old F1 adage, 'If you want to finish first, first you have to be a duplicitous little moaning git'
Quote
Old 24 Feb 2010, 22:16 (Ref:2640033)   #7
jab
Veteran
 
jab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Wales
South Wales/Coventry
Posts: 4,742
jab should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridjab should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridjab should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
OK

- Engines are in, 2nd cars out. Engine failures will be defined either by official records or by my own decision if it's contentious - an engine failure for an engine will be worth more than a normal retirement for a constructor. If the engine supplier goes over the engine number limit, there will be penalties applied. Best 3 scores will count for the engines

- I'll leave reserve drivers out for now but it's something we can work on for next year

- Joker races is a bit too pot luck, I think

- Drivers don't lose points through DNFs, anyway. They just get nothing. Only constructor (and now engine) points are deducted for DNFs
jab is offline  
__________________
F1 fans - over-reacting about everything since forever
Quote
Old 24 Feb 2010, 22:51 (Ref:2640054)   #8
jab
Veteran
 
jab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Wales
South Wales/Coventry
Posts: 4,742
jab should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridjab should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridjab should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
OK, here's a short sample of the rulebook (the actual rules post will be bigger):

Quote:
Entries
The idea is you have to pick 2 drivers and a constructor within a budget of 100,000 (insert currency here). You don’t get any points for not spending under the budget. None of these can be from the same team - you can’t pick 2 drivers from the same team or a driver and the constructor of the same team.

However, there is a major change for this year. As you all know, the entry list has expanded from 10 teams to 13 (theoretically) for this season, so I’m taking the opportunity to expand the constructors section. You now have to pick an engine as well as a chassis for your team. This cannot be the same engine as in the chassis already, although the drivers don’t matter in this case

The top 3 engine scores (excluding the points given out for engine failures) count. There will be a 5 point penalty for every engine failure in a race, and a further 10 point penalty if the engine limit is exceeded for a driver (i.e. they get grid penalties for changing engines)

To allow for this change, the constructor prices have been reduced (put it down to the global financial crisis or something)

Please use the following entry form to post entries:

Team name:
Constructor:
Engine:
Driver 1:
Driver 2:

Please include the prices as well

Scoring System
This is something I will also change as I have an unhealthy fascination with points systems. To bring FF1 inline with the recent changes in F1 and FF1 itself, I’m going to alter the system, with more points on offer, a different structure, and the addition of points for pole, fastest lap and laps led for drivers. Engines have their own system as well. Quite complex now but then you don’t have to do all the work

Drivers:
Win: 25 pts
2nd: 18
3rd: 15
High points finish (4th-6th): 10
Low points finish (7th-10th): 5
Non-scoring finish: 3
DNF: 0

Driver Bonuses:
Pole: 3
Fastest Lap: 3
Lead a Lap: 1
Most Laps Lead: 3
Points per positions gained/lost from grid slot: 2

Constructors:
Win: 10 pts
2nd: 8
3rd: 6
High points finish (4th-6th): 4
Low points finish (7th-10th): 2
Non-scoring finish: 1
Technical DNF: -3

Constructor Bonuses:
Pole: 3
Fastest Lap: 3

Engines:
Win: 5 pts
2nd: 4
3rd: 3
Points finish (4th-10th): 2
Non-scoring finish: 1
Engine failure: -5

Engine Bonuses
Pole: 1
Fastest Lap: 1

FAQs

I didn’t enter before the start of the season. Does this mean I now can’t take part?
You can enter whenever you like through the season. Just don’t expect points for the rounds you entered after. The deadline for each round is the start of Free Practice 1

Can I make any substitutions during the season?
You can make one free driver substitution during the season. You can make more than one change but it will cost you 15 points for every change after the first one. You cannot change constructors or engines

What happens if my driver is injured/killed/unable to participate in races due to legal reasons?
Automatically, you will receive points from that drivers’ replacement in his team, unless you request for a substitution. So, using an example from last year, if you picked Massa and he was injured and you don’t fancy the idea of Badoer or Fisichella picking up points for you instead, you would have to make a substitution. I believe this is a slight change from last year, as I believe in the past you would’ve continued to score no points until you made a change

What happens if a driver is injured/killed/unable to participate in the race due to legal reasons, and one of my drivers moves teams to replace him, thus clashing with the team I chose at the beginning, e.g. if I picked Fisichella and Ferrari last year?
Don’t worry about it

Who is in charge?
I am. That means I decide what happens if things go array, like disqualifications, shortened races, lightning strikes and so on. Even $100m fines and disqualifications from the constructors championship. And no, picking Webber will not gain extra bonus points. And call me James. That is my name
...
Drivers in order of cost:

Lewis Hamilton - 50,000
Michael Schumacher - 50,000
Fernando Alonso - 50,000
Sebastian Vettel - 50,000
Jenson Button - 45,000
Felipe Massa -45,000
Mark Webber - 45,000
Nico Rosberg - 40,000
Rubens Barrichello - 25,000
Robert Kubica - 25,000
Nico Hulkenberg - 20,000
Adrian Sutil - 20,000
Pedro de la Rosa - 20,000
Kamui Kobayashi - 20,000
Vitantonio Liuzzi - 15,000
Sebastien Buemi - 15,000
Vitaly Petrov - 12,000
Jaime Alguersuari - 12,000
Jarno Trulli - 10,000
Timo Glock - 10,000
Heikki Kovalainen - 8,000
Lucas di Grassi - 7,000
Bruno Senna - 5,000
2nd Campos driver - 5,000
Jose Maria Lopez - 5,000
2nd US F1 driver - 5,000

Constructors in order of cost:

Mercedes - 30,000
Red Bull - 30,000
McLaren - 30,000
Ferrari - 30,000
Williams - 20,000
Renault - 15,000
Sauber - 15,000
Force India - 12,000
Toro Rosso - 10,000
Lotus - 6,000
Virgin - 6,000
Campos - 3,000
US F1 - 3,000

Engines in order of cost:

Mercedes - 25,000
Ferrari - 20,000
Renault - 15,000
Cosworth - 10,000
Any issues with this?
jab is offline  
__________________
F1 fans - over-reacting about everything since forever
Quote
Old 24 Feb 2010, 23:02 (Ref:2640058)   #9
courageous
Veteran
 
courageous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
United Kingdom
Chatham, Kent
Posts: 1,527
courageous should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridcourageous should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
RULESWho is in charge? I am.

A healthy dose of megalomania is always required to run this sort of thing
On that note - can I suggest that any "I think driver X should be worth more" type suggestions are not listened to; you will never get an agreement on those details.

One question I can see that needs clarifying - if I pick my Chassis as Mclaren & it DNFs because of an engine blow up, do I lose points?

And just a thought, to avoid pit stoppery giving drivers undue laps led points - how about making it "lead 5 consecutive laps = 1 point" or something along those line.
courageous is offline  
__________________
There's an old F1 adage, 'If you want to finish first, first you have to be a duplicitous little moaning git'
Quote
Old 24 Feb 2010, 23:04 (Ref:2640060)   #10
courageous
Veteran
 
courageous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
United Kingdom
Chatham, Kent
Posts: 1,527
courageous should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridcourageous should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by jab View Post
And no, picking Webber will not gain extra bonus points.
But what if he ends up driving for Renault?
courageous is offline  
__________________
There's an old F1 adage, 'If you want to finish first, first you have to be a duplicitous little moaning git'
Quote
Old 24 Feb 2010, 23:15 (Ref:2640070)   #11
Notso Swift
Veteran
 
Notso Swift's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
United Nations
37deg 46'52.36" S 144deg 59' 01.83"E
Posts: 1,912
Notso Swift should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I would suggest you actually keep it simple and continue what has previously been done for this year, then modify next year... but It looks the goods if you want to change the system.
Notso Swift is offline  
__________________
Contrary to popular opinion, I do have mechanical sympathy, I always feel sorry for the cars I drive.
Quote
Old 24 Feb 2010, 23:57 (Ref:2640091)   #12
ScotsBrutesFan
Race Official
Veteran
 
ScotsBrutesFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Scotland
West Lothian
Posts: 5,709
ScotsBrutesFan will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameScotsBrutesFan will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameScotsBrutesFan will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameScotsBrutesFan will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameScotsBrutesFan will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameScotsBrutesFan will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameScotsBrutesFan will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameScotsBrutesFan will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameScotsBrutesFan will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Fame
Quote:
Originally Posted by courageous View Post

And just a thought, to avoid pit stoppery giving drivers undue laps led points - how about making it "lead 5 consecutive laps = 1 point" or something along those line.
Your then going to get the ....

He crossed the line in the lead 4 times in succession but then pulled into the pits, with the car in second crossing the timing line before he does as he's first or second garage, and the timing line is half way down the pitlane.
He deserves a point.

I think jab had it right, 3 points for crossing the finish line in the lead most often, and a point for anyone else that through luck or judgement crossed the line in the lead at any other point in the race.
ScotsBrutesFan is offline  
Quote
Old 25 Feb 2010, 00:20 (Ref:2640103)   #13
mattt
Veteran
 
mattt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
England
Cambridge
Posts: 2,306
mattt should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridmattt should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Can i choose the safety car driver?
mattt is offline  
Quote
Old 25 Feb 2010, 09:00 (Ref:2640199)   #14
jab
Veteran
 
jab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Wales
South Wales/Coventry
Posts: 4,742
jab should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridjab should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridjab should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by courageous View Post
One question I can see that needs clarifying - if I pick my Chassis as Mclaren & it DNFs because of an engine blow up, do I lose points?
Yes. It's anything as long as it's not the driver's fault, because the car design is invariably going to have an impact on the engine (yes, I'm talking about you, Adrian Newey)
jab is offline  
__________________
F1 fans - over-reacting about everything since forever
Quote
Old 25 Feb 2010, 09:23 (Ref:2640210)   #15
Armco Bender
Llama Assassin and Sheep Botherer
Veteran
 
Armco Bender's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
New Zealand
International Sheep Ambassador
Posts: 4,212
Armco Bender is going for a new world record!Armco Bender is going for a new world record!Armco Bender is going for a new world record!Armco Bender is going for a new world record!Armco Bender is going for a new world record!Armco Bender is going for a new world record!Armco Bender is going for a new world record!
Lets cut to the chase,do you take bribes?.




Team name: Sheep Botherers
Constructor: Force India - 12,000
Engine:Mercedes - 25,000
Driver 1: Sebastian Vettel - 50,000
Driver 2:Timo Glock - 10,000
(97,000)
Armco Bender is offline  
Quote
Old 25 Feb 2010, 09:31 (Ref:2640214)   #16
jab
Veteran
 
jab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Wales
South Wales/Coventry
Posts: 4,742
jab should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridjab should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridjab should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
I'll open the entry thread in a minute

I'm not sure on the constructor-engine combinations, though. I've written in the rules above not to have the realistic combinations (i.e. you can't have a Mercedes chassis and engine, or a Red Bull chassis and a Renault engine), but I think I'll get rid of it as it is too restrictive. I'll leave it out for now
jab is offline  
__________________
F1 fans - over-reacting about everything since forever
Quote
Old 25 Feb 2010, 22:06 (Ref:2640584)   #17
jab
Veteran
 
jab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Wales
South Wales/Coventry
Posts: 4,742
jab should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridjab should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridjab should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
As a final addition for this year, would anyone approve of/object to a points bonus for the entrant who scores the most points for winning a race? I was thinking not much, about 3 points
jab is offline  
__________________
F1 fans - over-reacting about everything since forever
Quote
Old 26 Feb 2010, 16:29 (Ref:2641009)   #18
jab
Veteran
 
jab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Wales
South Wales/Coventry
Posts: 4,742
jab should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridjab should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridjab should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
As no one has objected, I guess I'm OK to add that in

3 points for the entry that scores the most point during a race

I'm also archiving previous years' results, which will mean I can award a Rookie of the Year Prize, which, funnily enough, I will be up for, and a Veterans Prize for those that have competed in at least 2 previous championships

Last edited by jab; 26 Feb 2010 at 16:56.
jab is offline  
__________________
F1 fans - over-reacting about everything since forever
Quote
Old 2 Mar 2010, 21:22 (Ref:2643603)   #19
jab
Veteran
 
jab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Wales
South Wales/Coventry
Posts: 4,742
jab should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridjab should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridjab should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Received a question tonight on the scoring for the engines, due to the nature of the engine suppliers supplying different numbers of cars (Ferrari 6, Renault 4, Mercedes 6 and Cosworth 6-8)

Just to clarify, the scores that count are from the top 3 cars with those engines in, plus deducted points for engine failures during the race

e.g

- If Webber finishes 1st, Vettel 2nd, Kubica 4th and Petrov 15th, only the scores for 1st, 2nd and 4th count

- If Petrov retires due to engine failure, the scores for 1st, 2nd and 4th count but also there is a points deduction for the engine failure

I apologise if anyone's gone for Cosworth thinking it's a bargain when they are supplying more cars than everyone else...

Also given that US F1 is pretty much dead, await further news on the entry list situation. An official entry list is due out tomorrow. I have had a contigency in place as far as prices go for Stefan GP since the beginning just in case they get in, although it looks unlikely. All entries including Campos will automatically be converted to Hispania (or whatever they choose to call the team)
jab is offline  
__________________
F1 fans - over-reacting about everything since forever
Quote
Old 4 Mar 2010, 00:37 (Ref:2644501)   #20
Notso Swift
Veteran
 
Notso Swift's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
United Nations
37deg 46'52.36" S 144deg 59' 01.83"E
Posts: 1,912
Notso Swift should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I did but not because I thought I had 8 scorers, more because I thought there is no way I could have 3/5 failures. Especially considering it is more likely that the Cosworth Teams are less likely to finish (the same could be said with anyone other than Renault power, though they have less back markers).
Can't really change my entry, because I have spent my money, so I would need to do multiple changes, and over all I would only go to the Renault, which means a change away from Red Bull, which and I would need to drop 5k on my second driver, and someone may have that combo... which is all too hard!

But to clarify an engine failure during the race is only counted where the official results list "Engine" not where we see that an engine "looks" like it has gone
Notso Swift is offline  
__________________
Contrary to popular opinion, I do have mechanical sympathy, I always feel sorry for the cars I drive.
Quote
Old 4 Mar 2010, 09:13 (Ref:2644661)   #21
jab
Veteran
 
jab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Wales
South Wales/Coventry
Posts: 4,742
jab should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridjab should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridjab should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Notso Swift View Post
But to clarify an engine failure during the race is only counted where the official results list "Engine" not where we see that an engine "looks" like it has gone
Yeah, pretty much
jab is offline  
__________________
F1 fans - over-reacting about everything since forever
Quote
Old 4 Mar 2010, 16:26 (Ref:2644919)   #22
jab
Veteran
 
jab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Wales
South Wales/Coventry
Posts: 4,742
jab should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridjab should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridjab should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Again, another clarification - Chandhok is still worth 5,000, if anyone wants to take a gamble on him
jab is offline  
__________________
F1 fans - over-reacting about everything since forever
Quote
Old 6 Apr 2010, 08:15 (Ref:2667472)   #23
Splatz the Cow
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Australia
Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 1,217
Splatz the Cow should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridSplatz the Cow should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Chandhok looking reasonable value now.

Last edited by Splatz the Cow; 6 Apr 2010 at 08:16. Reason: spulling
Splatz the Cow is offline  
Quote
Old 22 Jun 2010, 12:16 (Ref:2716300)   #24
jab
Veteran
 
jab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Wales
South Wales/Coventry
Posts: 4,742
jab should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridjab should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridjab should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Rule clarification:

Whilst working out the results (yes, this is actually happening), I've noticed there are a few instances where drivers haven't finished due to a mechanical failure of some kind but are still classified. Mechanical DNFs usually mean -3 points for constructors points. However, if they are classified, there will be no minus constructors points, but if it's an engine failure and they're still classified (see Alonso in Malaysia, or Liuzzi in Spain), that will still mean -5 on the engine points

However, I'm willing to change this if it was different before and people want to keep it that way
jab is offline  
__________________
F1 fans - over-reacting about everything since forever
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[DTM] Rules frozen for 2010 season JMeissner Touring Car Racing 4 7 Aug 2009 09:08
Constructive suggestions from the Silverstone F1 weekend deadsquirrel Marshals Forum 102 18 Jul 2007 15:54
Suggestions on the future of F1 Stargazer7 Formula One 18 25 Aug 2005 03:59


All times are GMT. The time now is 22:41.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.