|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
11 Apr 2014, 16:06 (Ref:3391161) | #6401 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 588
|
Although I was certainly more a fan of the ALMS than Grand AM, I do wonder: Has the fact that there have been only a few teams in the past few years in the ALMS P categories lead to those teams not really being as good, end of story, as those in DP.
Where DP may have been spec, there were 5-6 teams fighting it out. More teams = stronger competition and evolving to win. If all you have to do is beat "the other team" maybe it's not really much of a benchmark for how good the ALMS P teams were in the first place. Clearly the P2 cars are close, if at certain disadvantages, but maybe the ALMS P teams needs to stop crying about it and just get better. |
||
__________________
-Nate |
11 Apr 2014, 16:06 (Ref:3391162) | #6402 | |
Racer
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 160
|
||
|
11 Apr 2014, 16:06 (Ref:3391163) | #6403 | |
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 318
|
Oh, it's hard to tell who is "in the garage" here on the forums
IF ESM and Oak pull out, the series is going to have do some quick footwork. All this mantra about how "good" the BoP is will look pretty silly if all the P2 cars (Mazda is just a test team) pull from races. They don't NEED to do much, simply reduce the HP on the DP's a little and the BoP will be almost perfect. The cars will be never be exactly the same, but they've done a pretty good job getting the DP cars to handle better. Then again, I guess that wasn't THAT hard if you throw a couple hundred K at the problem. Last edited by Danathar; 11 Apr 2014 at 16:08. Reason: grammar |
|
|
11 Apr 2014, 16:10 (Ref:3391166) | #6404 | |
Racer
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 160
|
Why doesn't IMSA just reduce the power a bit? Seems like it would be easy to do. Then the P2 cars would all come back and there would be more cars. I would think you'd want more cars out on the track.
|
|
|
11 Apr 2014, 16:18 (Ref:3391174) | #6405 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 318
|
Quote:
It could be that they think that the DP owners are more important as a group (along with Ford and GM as engine manufacturers) than the P2 cars, especially since DP owners had to shell out BIG bucks to get their cars faster than GTE and P2. We might just be basically DP until the new regs for P2 cars are here which IMSA said they were going to adopt in 2017. Since they upgraded DP's, sure they are now fast and maneuverable. And I'll even say the corvette DP looks cool. But everybody knows, the rest of the world simply does not care about DP racing, and in the U.S. neither does most of the core racing fans (many more ALMS than Grand AM fans). If you want to be taken seriously against competition in the rest of the world you have to be running the formula of cars the rest of the world is running AND you have to be at LeMans. It's that simple. |
||
|
11 Apr 2014, 16:20 (Ref:3391177) | #6406 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,325
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
Ceterum censeo GTE-Am esse delendam. |
11 Apr 2014, 16:26 (Ref:3391182) | #6407 | |
Racer
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 409
|
The biggest problem is the tire!!!!
It was design for the DP so it is really not a fair spec tire. The P2 is 2+seconds slower on them compared to tires design for a P2. I see the only way to fix the problem is let the P2 run P2 tires!!!!! Then the P2 can take the fight to the DP but it will be tough because they would have to pass going into the corner or out of the corner(hope the DP doesn't repass you down the straight) because the DP would still own the straights. Source....Marshall was talking about this at the MW Radio Show this week. |
|
|
11 Apr 2014, 16:30 (Ref:3391183) | #6408 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 318
|
Quote:
I bet continental can make a good tire for the P2, but the current tire is designed for DP so it sucks for P2 cars to have to wear shoes designed for another person. |
||
|
11 Apr 2014, 16:30 (Ref:3391184) | #6409 | |
Racer
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 160
|
FIA GT3 cars don't run at LeMans. So, they are not taken seriously either.
|
|
|
11 Apr 2014, 16:34 (Ref:3391185) | #6410 | |
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 318
|
||
|
11 Apr 2014, 16:38 (Ref:3391187) | #6411 | |
Racer
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 160
|
If IMSA let the P2 cars run a P2 tire that makes them 2 seconds a lap faster than they are now, wouldn't all of the DP teams pull out? Why not make a generic tire like they do for a series like Pirelli World Challenge and let the teams figure out how to make the car work around it? Couldn't Continental do that? If they couldn't, then why not go to a different tire supplier (i.e. Michelin)?
|
|
|
11 Apr 2014, 16:45 (Ref:3391190) | #6412 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 2,143
|
Quote:
The was an accident north bound five and some idiots decided to turn around infront of us going south bound,completely cut us off.we did everithing in our power to miss them but unfortunately the pick up behind us just barely rear ended us.now the truck is probably totaled and were home with a rental car. We are going to do everything we can to get there by tonight hopefully bu qualifying,7 hour drive though this **** better be worth it! And by t&s its not looking good p2 wise. Hope you guys have fun and well see where this mess ends up..... |
|||
|
11 Apr 2014, 16:47 (Ref:3391191) | #6413 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 364
|
Quote:
Which is another reason why IMSA should look at making GTD full GT3 spec. The same team could theoretically run Dubai*, Daytona, Sebring, Bathurst*, the Nring, and Spa * not likely with the same car due to shipping a car half way across the world |
|||
|
11 Apr 2014, 16:59 (Ref:3391193) | #6414 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 160
|
Quote:
It makes sense because P2 and GTLM are an international standard and can be raced anywhere, including LeMans. With those classes, they have a global following as opposed to the others that are just national. I'd consider these national classes as a stepping stone to the global stage. Maybe they are not liked but they do offer a feeder for the global classes. Like the local dirt track feeding to NASCAR. DP and GTD serve as a feeder to P2 and GTLM. Maybe these classes are not liked but they do serve a purpose. Having a feeder class running with the serious global classes is not the best idea. They need to separate them out. |
||
|
11 Apr 2014, 17:01 (Ref:3391195) | #6415 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 7,175
|
Er you don't take V8SC seriously?
|
||
|
11 Apr 2014, 17:14 (Ref:3391198) | #6416 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 4,126
|
Let's please not drag V8SC into this discussion, it really isn't needed I don't think!
|
||
__________________
You live and learn. At any rate, you live. Douglas Adams |
11 Apr 2014, 17:17 (Ref:3391199) | #6417 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 318
|
Quote:
The WEC has developed as the premier series for international sports car racing. Before the WEC came on strong, the ALMS had that role (except for LeMans). If only we had better coverage of the WEC in the U.S. |
||
|
11 Apr 2014, 17:48 (Ref:3391213) | #6418 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 2,470
|
Quote:
OAK has to be looking to ship everything back home. I cannot see how, or why, they would continue. The P2 gap is anywhere from 0.9-1.8 sec behind the DP. Sorry IMSA, your BoP still sucks. Even if the race goes perfectly this weekend, and the P2 cars still are lagging behind, don't be surprised if they don't return for Round 4. The only BoP change was a boost pressure change for the Ford DP....Really? What really baffles me is that the Ford-DP gets a nearly 2.7mm larger restrictor, and slightly less boost. 0.4psi less. 29.7psi max boost for the HPD 25.5psi for the Ford. Last edited by MoMedic9019; 11 Apr 2014 at 17:55. |
|||
__________________
“We’re trying to close the doors without embarrassing ourselves, the France family and embarrassing (the) Grand American Series,” he said in the deposition. “There is no money. There is no purse. There’s nothing.” |
11 Apr 2014, 18:16 (Ref:3391219) | #6419 | |
Racer
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 160
|
There has to be an exit clause for Patron (nobody would ever write a contract today without one). It'll be writing a check and they can walk away. Without having a fighting chance to win, Patron might consider exercising this option. What else to consider, let them start winning races and it looks like Patron bought the championship.
|
|
|
11 Apr 2014, 18:37 (Ref:3391225) | #6420 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 2,470
|
Quote:
Should have read... I would highly doubt that the contract written for sponsorship doesn't have language in it that would allow them to back out whenever you want |
|||
__________________
“We’re trying to close the doors without embarrassing ourselves, the France family and embarrassing (the) Grand American Series,” he said in the deposition. “There is no money. There is no purse. There’s nothing.” |
11 Apr 2014, 18:54 (Ref:3391230) | #6421 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 15,697
|
Oak stated they are running this year to promote sales of their new chassis. Leaving mid-season isn't the best way to showcase your wares. Don't be surprised to see a Ligier pop up later this season either.
|
||
|
11 Apr 2014, 18:59 (Ref:3391232) | #6422 | |
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 291
|
Well if this keeps up just remember, it will only (or should i say should) be for maximum 2 years we keep DP's. I just hope the series survives until 2016 to have proper prototypes and gt's doing their stuff.
|
|
|
11 Apr 2014, 21:14 (Ref:3391273) | #6423 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 2,470
|
Quote:
As for the Ligier, yes, 8-Star confirmed that some time ago...just a matter of engines. |
|||
__________________
“We’re trying to close the doors without embarrassing ourselves, the France family and embarrassing (the) Grand American Series,” he said in the deposition. “There is no money. There is no purse. There’s nothing.” |
11 Apr 2014, 21:18 (Ref:3391274) | #6424 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,395
|
Is the fact losing to DP's helping? I think thats the talking point. Why even look to P2 in the future when you can see the rule makers favortise "their cars" currently? Who would want to run in the series where your car has little chance to shine? They need to prove they can equalise cars. So far, a few teams voices are being heard by withdraws.
|
|
|
11 Apr 2014, 21:29 (Ref:3391276) | #6425 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,638
|
Why are people commenting as if the P2s have been obliterated by the DPs. We are dealing with a very small sample size: 2 races. One of those races, Daytona, gave the clear edge to DPs due to the nature of the track. Sebring was a much closer affair...I mean, ESM were leading and had a very good chance of winning. It's not perfect but it isn't completely lopsided either...unless I'm watching the wrong series.
|
||
__________________
Roger Penske to Paul Tracy about the Indy 500: "We both won it but I've got the trophy" |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Series to face axe | AndyF | National & Club Racing | 8 | 6 Aug 2001 11:54 |
Will the BTCC get the axe? | Sodemo2 | Touring Car Racing | 8 | 6 Mar 2001 13:58 |