|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
4 Apr 2006, 01:41 (Ref:1569671) | #1 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 8
|
Future Of F1
By the year 2008, do you think Formula One will exist as we know it today? If not, how will it change?
|
||
|
4 Apr 2006, 01:45 (Ref:1569673) | #2 | ||
Race Official
20KPINAL
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 21,606
|
F1 is always changing. Look back some years ago and it was a different game. F1 is dynamic and that keeps they going on. It will be different, but still F1, and I bet still popular and this forum will be full of fans.
|
||
__________________
Show me a man who won't give it to his woman An' I'll show you somebody who will |
4 Apr 2006, 01:54 (Ref:1569679) | #3 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 173
|
But F1 is not doing so great at ticket sales
|
||
|
4 Apr 2006, 07:07 (Ref:1569785) | #4 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 42,635
|
Is that actually true?
it should be noted that Silverstone's attendence hasn't increased for some time On a general note I could care less as long as it is still around. |
||
__________________
Seriously not taking motorsport too seriously. |
4 Apr 2006, 07:13 (Ref:1569789) | #5 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 692
|
I think Lord Bernie has enough money to keep it going past 2008
|
||
__________________
Damn! I knew that Pole Dancing could be technical, but never to THAT degree! |
4 Apr 2006, 07:18 (Ref:1569793) | #6 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 42,635
|
Bernie would not support it if there were no return.
|
||
__________________
Seriously not taking motorsport too seriously. |
4 Apr 2006, 09:36 (Ref:1569906) | #7 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,523
|
F1 is all about the pinnacle of development.
The Max comes along with ideas to freeze it for a few years. I know it's gone mad in these last few years, with money poured in like there was no tomorrow. Perhaps they need to look at other ways of allowing development, but keeping performance in check. I still say that fuel restrictions would be the best way to go. "Here you go, here's 150L of petrol (or 200L of bio-ethanol) that we just bought from the local supermarket down the road - now do what you can with it - you can't have anymore" No restrictions on engine capacity, forced induction, number of cylinders, etc.. By limiting the fuel, you effectively limit the power. And with the FIA supplying the fuel, it stops exotic mixes that push the rules to the limit. Oh, and next year, you only get 140L of petrol, or 190L of bio-ethanol. That should keep then engine development going in the right direction. And back to slicks and flat bottom cars. Let's have some close racing again. |
||
__________________
There is no substitute for cubic inches. Harry Belamonte - 403ci Vauxhall Belmont!! A 700hp wayward shopping trolley on steroids!! |
4 Apr 2006, 09:50 (Ref:1569915) | #8 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,382
|
I like your limit on fuel idea. they burn 250 litres during a GP at the moment or something crazy dont they ?
Id love to see teams told to race on 100 litres of petrol for a GP, or 250 litres of hydrogen |
|
__________________
... without motorsport, what is sport? |
4 Apr 2006, 10:15 (Ref:1569931) | #9 | |
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,951
|
They should allow diesel fuel in an F1 car.
If Audi can do it succesfully... |
|
|
4 Apr 2006, 10:33 (Ref:1569952) | #10 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,193
|
Formula 1 might be losing it after 2008. The proposed regulations will be introduced to improve the racing. But all kind of these measures just had the opposite effect.
|
||
|
4 Apr 2006, 13:05 (Ref:1570107) | #11 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,618
|
yea lets improve the racing by freeing up the teams as opposed to restricting them. much of the current state of no passing comes from rules eliminating downforce. the teams in an attempt to claw it back move towards more aerodynamically unstable modifications that get it back at the cost of the ability to follow. means leaving passes to pitstops.
I think eventually Max will leave and someone with a better head on their shoulders will come in. someone who is in it for racing and isn't just bernies puppet |
||
__________________
I refuse to let fact get in the way of my opinion |
4 Apr 2006, 13:08 (Ref:1570109) | #12 | |
20KPINAL
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 29,853
|
Did you miss the overtaking on Sunday then?
|
|
|
6 Apr 2006, 12:55 (Ref:1572245) | #13 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,618
|
Quote:
Look left I must disagree. F1 didn't seem to lose any fans (at least not on here) because Ferrari did well. Sometimes it helps to have what some people view as the darthteam. I hate to make the comparison but it seems appropriate in the context of this discussio nto bring up NASCAR. NASCAR is not anything we F1 fans (for the most part) find all that interesting, yet it is an enormous success. The drivers and teams have personalities they aren't robots. The racings close and even if its contrived (restrictor plates) its alot more exciting to watch a race with 100 passes for the lead than 1 if you ask most people in the US (personally I disagree). NASCAR has entertainment which F1 seems to have lost in hospitality sweets closed paddocks and motor homes within arms reach of the garage door |
|||
__________________
I refuse to let fact get in the way of my opinion |
6 Apr 2006, 13:03 (Ref:1572255) | #14 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,843
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
Part time wingman, full time spud. |
7 Apr 2006, 14:56 (Ref:1573194) | #15 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 394
|
Quote:
I still think back to the erly 90s when youd have live coverage of practise sessions taht sometimes got washed out with rain and for an hour you simply saw nothing. A tree and a fence, a piece of tarmac. And everybody was happy. |
||
__________________
Some people wear Superman pajamas. Superman wears Chuck Norris pajamas. |
7 Apr 2006, 16:49 (Ref:1573283) | #16 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,618
|
Quote:
I honestly think the problem is the rules are caught inbetween two value systems. People want it to be entertaining, but they want it to be fast. I say ditch the present rules give them a box and a weigth for the car. and then the rest of the rules are to prevent spectators from dieing. the drivers volunteer and get paid for a dangerous activity so suck it up. Fire fighters don't complain and they probably make 40K a year as opposed to MS's 40M Deo, your right it its supposed to be the ultimate and it no longer is. But unfortunately no one has the attention span for that anymore |
|||
__________________
I refuse to let fact get in the way of my opinion |
4 Apr 2006, 14:29 (Ref:1570538) | #17 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 9,641
|
If you painted all of the cars the same colour you would never know which was which.
Lets free up the regulations to allow different approaches to the same subject. It would be nice to see variety in design so that, perhaps, each car might suit certain circuits/conditions and we see better racing and a less predictable championship. Minimum weight, maximum fuel allowance. Get on with it! |
||
|
5 Apr 2006, 12:39 (Ref:1571383) | #18 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 482
|
Quote:
What a crock - the current breed of cars are art forms and very unique. If you don't think you could pick a matt black McLaren from a matt black Renault then you need to visit your local optometrist. Really, F1 fans are the most fickle bunch. We have 3 great races to start the season, 5 teams in with a reasonable chance but everyone wants to moan about something. 22 teams (44 cars) have lodged applications for 2008, some of which will be dreamers but others are the real deal. F1 will be just fine, the question is will YOU (royal you, not aimed at bauble) still be interested? |
||
|
8 Apr 2006, 20:48 (Ref:1574121) | #19 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 269
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
9 Apr 2006, 15:54 (Ref:1574627) | #20 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,193
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
9 Apr 2006, 16:06 (Ref:1574630) | #21 | ||
Retired
20KPINAL
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,897
|
Quote:
|
||
|
10 Apr 2006, 10:24 (Ref:1575408) | #22 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,193
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
4 Apr 2006, 14:35 (Ref:1570544) | #23 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,035
|
ooh, limiting fuel with no engine restrictions..... sounds like Group C!
And that provided some of the bestest and closest endurance racing ever!!! |
||
__________________
le bad boy |
4 Apr 2006, 14:47 (Ref:1570558) | #24 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,193
|
I'm in favour of a massive deregulation. A ban on refueling and a maximum amount of fuel with abolition of all other engine regulations would be great. Just as the reintroduction of ground effect and slicks.
|
||
|
4 Apr 2006, 15:05 (Ref:1570571) | #25 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 9,752
|
if i was to design a f1 car surely one aspect of my design is that it would be impossible to pass!
these maufactures require restrictions (and the fuel one is an excellent idea by the way) and allowing them to operate without any rules is like saying athletes in "whatever sport they play" should be allowed to make up the rules as the go along. concerning the future of F1- it must be said that in one respect Max is ahead of the curve because he knows its only a matter of time before the manufactures start to all pull out. with the 2 of worlds largest car manufactures about to go bust - its only a matter of time before the rest head in the same direction. |
||
__________________
Home, is where I want to be but I guess I'm already there I come home, she lifted up her wings guess that this must be the place |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Future Changes | mabs_nsx | Formula One | 68 | 13 Aug 2005 13:06 |
The Future.........???? | AndyF | National & Club Racing | 54 | 4 Jul 2003 23:41 |
Future Tourer Future | Crash Test | Australasian Touring Cars. | 13 | 17 Jul 2002 23:01 |
What is the future? | Midge | Marshals Forum | 2 | 23 Jun 2002 20:55 |