|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
20 May 2009, 11:18 (Ref:2465633) | #1 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,100
|
Simtek 2.0, Epsilon Euskadi, Ray Mallock and Campos planning 2010?
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/75440
This is interesting, as Epsilon Euskadi were speculated as being the European satellite of USF1. RML in F1 could be interesting, but do they have experience of building single seaters? Campos are even more doubtful unless they get someone like Dallara to build the cars. Perhaps Nick Wirth could bring things over his Acura LMP project? Would be interesting to have the Simtek name back in F1. |
||
__________________
Marbot : "Ironically, the main difference between a Red Bull and a Virgin is that Red Bull can make parts of its car smaller and floppier." |
20 May 2009, 12:06 (Ref:2465659) | #2 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,067
|
MTV Simtek, please!!! What beautiful cars, they were..
And also I really hope this thing doesn't get dragged out. It's incredibly frustrating seeing these teams throw their dummies out simply to keep the new teams out (not purely..). I'd rather new teams replace the current crop who see fit to continue this political war, tbh. It's so, so tiresome. Selby |
||
|
20 May 2009, 12:51 (Ref:2465686) | #3 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,100
|
It's not so much of an issue of keeping teams out, more one of a bizzare 2 teams system that no-one wants. No-one wants to have a system where the lower cost teams have a ridiculous technical advantage.
|
||
__________________
Marbot : "Ironically, the main difference between a Red Bull and a Virgin is that Red Bull can make parts of its car smaller and floppier." |
20 May 2009, 13:17 (Ref:2465701) | #4 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,067
|
Absolutely, but even if that's abolished arn't Ferrari still opposing the actual budget cap? that's my point. Anyone who isn't interesting in reducing costs/allowing the sport to grow again needs to leave, imo. Regardless of what history they have in the sport etc, if they arn't happy with today's climate, they should go. It's not fair putting the show on hold just because they arn't content. While I agree that a 2 tier system would be unfair, I can't help but feel this budget cap is what we need.
Selby |
||
|
20 May 2009, 13:36 (Ref:2465709) | #5 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,244
|
Hmm 8 teams of two cars each = 16 cars
+ Brawn and Williams with 2 cars each = 20 cars. Enough for one championship that can run the government cheque races that Bernie loves so much, meanwhile the manufacturers can break away, buy out A1GP and pick up all the good tracks like Monaco, Spa et al (and without having to service CVC's debt the tracks would be able to make a profit). Sounds good to me |
||
__________________
"On a given day, a given circumstance, you think you have a limit. And you then go for this limit and you touch this limit, and you think, 'Okay, this is the limit.' And so you touch this limit, something happens and you suddenly can go a little bit further. With your mind power, your determination, your instinct, and the experience as well, you can fly very high." -Ayrton Senna |
20 May 2009, 13:45 (Ref:2465714) | #6 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,958
|
Epsilon Euskadi, the team who bailed on Sportscars this season, due to a lack of funds... is going to run an F1 team? Hmmmm
|
||
|
20 May 2009, 15:18 (Ref:2465740) | #7 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 591
|
|||
|
20 May 2009, 16:26 (Ref:2465792) | #8 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 11,176
|
I dont understand fully what the teams are moaning about. The 40 million figure is simply for developing the car - correct? So that means then that with driver salaries, hospitality and all the rest of the costs, "big" teams are still going to be chewing through close to 100 Million...
|
||
|
20 May 2009, 16:30 (Ref:2465796) | #9 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,742
|
Quote:
This whole "we can't downsize" argument is just an excuse - they're more than prepared to just shut their teams down, which would waste a hell of a lot more. Even Honda saw it as less costly to sell than to shut down |
|||
|
20 May 2009, 18:56 (Ref:2465880) | #10 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,873
|
This is Epsilon Euskadi's LMP. With a limited budget, they produced a quick car with advanced aerodynamics. While it was never a top 15 car, I was impressed. This team I feel would do very well with a budget cap. They have quite an advanced facillity - the issue would be sponsorship. Look at that car - no sponsors on it at all - it couldn't even find any for Le Mans 24 hours. |
||
|
20 May 2009, 19:11 (Ref:2465895) | #11 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,742
|
As mentioned earlier, it'll be easier to attract sponsorship and investment for something more high profile like F1, especially if it brands itself as the "Spanish national team"
They've got sponsorship in WSR, as well as a handy line-up in Valles and van der Drift |
||
|
20 May 2009, 19:13 (Ref:2465897) | #12 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 785
|
Quote:
They're gonna go elsewhere, where they have a bit more freedom; in fact where the supposed new teams are supposedly going to be coming from. |
|||
|
20 May 2009, 19:15 (Ref:2465899) | #13 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,873
|
the Le Mans 24 hours is every bit as high profile, with 250,000 fans of all nationalities - thats on Indy 500 levels. If you can't find one-off sponsorship for that event, you're going to struggle.
|
||
|
20 May 2009, 19:18 (Ref:2465902) | #14 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,742
|
It's a one-off event not many people actually watch outside of the hardcore fans that actually go there. And Indy isn't far off that these days as well
It might be high profile in a motor racing sense but in the grand scheme of things, it's nowhere near as popular as F1, which is pretty much the most watched sport in the world (or something like that). Millions watch it |
||
|
20 May 2009, 19:27 (Ref:2465910) | #15 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,873
|
Quote:
But yes, I agree, Formula One is generally more popular. The other issue with Le Mans is that there are 55 cars spread out on an 8 mile circuit - far less exposure! |
|||
|
20 May 2009, 20:13 (Ref:2465937) | #16 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,500
|
Quote:
|
||
|
20 May 2009, 20:29 (Ref:2465951) | #17 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,742
|
Quote:
Meanwhile, Addax have denied they're entering, so I take it that the Campos thing is Adrian on his own... |
|||
|
20 May 2009, 21:34 (Ref:2466003) | #18 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,354
|
Television viewing figures are not representative of the value or real publicity value of a sport when taken in isolation except for marketing guru's wanting to extract more money from advertisers.
LeMans attendance is still huge over the 48 hours leading up to the event and it would be a very simple step from the present to go an hours live coverage of the first and last hour of the event with half hour live updates every three or four hours during the event. If you added BMW, Ferrari, Renault and Toyota to the present mix it would easily grab the imaginations of half a billion people quite quickly as did the Ford-Ferrari battles in the mid sixties and become significantly more important inn Europe than the Indy 500, and the Daytona 500 are in North America, and far more important internationally than any single motorport event in the world. |
|
|
20 May 2009, 21:45 (Ref:2466011) | #19 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,873
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
20 May 2009, 21:54 (Ref:2466019) | #20 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,742
|
The world has changed a lot since the 1960s. Everything has to be instant to serve audiences with a short attention span. I don't think a modern audience would take to Le Mans and endurance racing these days because they wouldn't have the patience to sit through a 6 or 12 or 24 hour race. Why do you think the 24 hour coverage of Le Mans is on Eurosport whilst the don't even have any on terrestrial, and before that only had the end on ITV? People generally just tune in to watch the start and end
Endurance racing isn't as popular as it was not because we don't have a Ford vs Ferrari battle - we have Audi vs Peugeot right now, with Aston joining. It's not as popular because the world has changed and people have changed. I don't believe that if Ferrari and co went over that it would become far more popular overnight. It's very much a niche genre - you either like it a lot or you don't. It's a bit underground. It would gain some fans but I think the majority of tifosi and the like would lose interest because it doesn't have the action F1 has (or is perceived to have) I watch Le Mans every year and I follow endurance racing but that won't change just because there are more or less manufacturers in it. I think the majority of people would be the same. Endurance racing will never hit the heights it has hit (or allegedly hit, in Group C's case) again. It's the motorsport equivalent of test cricket - it's too specialised, and we're moving in an opposite direction in the sporting world in general. The only way I see it become more popular is if it removes the one factor that makes it stand out - endurance. And I doubt the purists would be happy if the 24 Hours of Le Mans became the 24 Minutes of Le Mans |
||
|
20 May 2009, 21:57 (Ref:2466025) | #21 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 587
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
"It's the usual stuff with luck. People like my teammate suddenly get a safety car period and found himself on the podium. So that was basically it. - Alonso, Germany 2008 |
20 May 2009, 21:58 (Ref:2466027) | #22 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,434
|
Quote:
With regards to other team the fact that Epsilon Euskadi features is no great surprise given that Joan Villadelprat has long been quoted as being keen to run a Spanish F1 team. Ray Mallock Ltd are a surprise, however, they do have a tradition of constructing their own cars, although perhaps not on the scale of a F1 car. Nick Wirth's concern entering is a surprise given that the last time he ran was Simtek back in '95. I do wonder whether this entry (and Mark Preston's Formtech, which is rumoured to have entered) will seek to join up with another prospective team in that they would design and build the cars, whilst the partner team races them. |
|||
|
20 May 2009, 22:01 (Ref:2466031) | #23 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,742
|
Formtech were rumoured to be going in with Colin Kolles. So usual Kolles candidates for drivers - Albers, Karthikeyan, Mondini, Bakkerud etc
It really does sound like an early 90s backmarker. I see a black, white and red livery not unlike that of Fondmetal... |
||
|
20 May 2009, 22:03 (Ref:2466033) | #24 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,873
|
|||
|
20 May 2009, 22:10 (Ref:2466041) | #25 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 587
|
|||
__________________
"It's the usual stuff with luck. People like my teammate suddenly get a safety car period and found himself on the podium. So that was basically it. - Alonso, Germany 2008 |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Epsilon Euskadi? | DanJR1 | Sportscar & GT Racing | 108 | 12 Nov 2009 15:44 |
What is Adrian Campos up to? | Kiwi3 | National & International Single Seaters | 13 | 15 Oct 2008 10:55 |
New Epsilon Euskadi LMP1 for 2007 | FIRE | Sportscar & GT Racing | 208 | 18 Jun 2008 10:46 |
Drivers for Epsilon Euskadi???? | milano | Sportscar & GT Racing | 6 | 26 Feb 2008 23:23 |
Would someone explain the Epsilon Euskadi for me? | jafine | National & International Single Seaters | 10 | 15 Oct 2005 20:19 |