|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
18 Oct 2013, 11:57 (Ref:3319416) | #26 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,721
|
It does seem unfair to penalise taller drivers - Webber, Hülkenberg, before them Doornbos, Wilson - for something they can't do anything about.
|
||
__________________
Interviewer: "Will the McLaren F1 be your answer to the Ferrari F40?" Gordon Murray: "Hmm... I don't think we have anyone at McLaren who can weld that badly..." |
19 Oct 2013, 04:39 (Ref:3319706) | #27 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 8,088
|
||
|
19 Oct 2013, 06:13 (Ref:3319719) | #28 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 107
|
|||
__________________
///M |
20 Oct 2013, 08:38 (Ref:3320453) | #29 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 398
|
It has been my understanding that the cars are built a lot lighter than the weight limit and that all of them carry ballast so they are all at the same minimum weight. Is that not the case any more? I thought the advantage of a lighter driver was merely the ability to place more ballast low down resulting in a lower center of gravity compared to a heavier driver.
|
||
__________________
We are building a fighting force of extraordinary magnitude. We forge our spirits in the tradition of our ancestors. You have my gratitude! |
20 Oct 2013, 21:59 (Ref:3320711) | #30 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 8,088
|
Quote:
|
||
|
25 Nov 2013, 01:05 (Ref:3336298) | #31 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 8,088
|
Driver size and weight packaging - straight from the horses mouth; Adrian Newey on selecting Daniel Ricciardo, an interesting insight!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DHDIj2rMu8Q |
|
|
25 Nov 2013, 23:57 (Ref:3336779) | #32 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,229
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
26 Nov 2013, 01:19 (Ref:3336802) | #33 | |
Retired
20KPINAL
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,897
|
||
|
26 Nov 2013, 08:12 (Ref:3336857) | #34 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,188
|
Alonso, Massa and Mercedes were very much against raising the weight limit during the GPDA meeting a few days ago.
http://speedblog.speed.com/speed/for...weight-change/ |
||
|
26 Nov 2013, 08:47 (Ref:3336864) | #35 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 8,088
|
Quote:
Two smallest lightest drivers on the grid want to keep their advantage! No surprise there! (I don't believe the weight posted for Vettel.) Still he is probably at the lighter end of the spectrum: "Intriguingly one of those keen for the change to go through was Sebastian Vettel, who freely admitted that he has had an advantage over Mark Webber for the past few seasons." And Mercedes blocking a 10 kg weight increase for the drivers .... Clearly the driver weight is a bigger issue than its made out to be! Time to bin power steering! |
||
|
26 Nov 2013, 11:24 (Ref:3336904) | #36 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,191
|
I fail to see why the minimum weight should be raised further. Driver weight parity is nonsense; the drivers body weight did count for the total minimum weight no earlier than 1995 and before that nobody complained.
|
||
__________________
'Aerodynamics are for people who can't build engines.' - Enzo Ferrari |
18 Feb 2014, 06:09 (Ref:3369571) | #37 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 8,088
|
Driver weight parity rules in Indycar
14.3.2. Driver Equivalency Weight – INDYCAR shall determine the additional Driver Equivalency Weight required and shall notify each Entrant by bulletin. The Driver Equivalency Weight must be installed and secured in the designed location forward of the seatback as per the following illustration. The Driver Equivalency Weight must be a hard dense metal. Violation of this Rule 14.3.2 may result in a minimum $100,000 monetary fine and/or such other penalties as INDYCAR shall deem appropriate. 14.3.2.1. Driver Equivalency Weight will be required to bring the combined weight of Driver and driver ballast to 185lbs. The Driver ballast weight tolerance is - 0 to + 1.00lbs. INDYCAR reserves the right to weigh any Driver at any time and adjust driver ballast accordingly.From https://hardcards.indycar.com/Resour..._RULE_BOOK.pdf |
|
|
12 Mar 2014, 22:57 (Ref:3378013) | #38 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 8,088
|
||
|
12 Mar 2014, 23:08 (Ref:3378019) | #39 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 3,548
|
Quote:
Up to last year the teams had no major problem with larger drivers but in 2014 they are having difficulty reaching the minimum weight with all the extra bits needed for the new regs. |
||
|
14 Mar 2014, 02:05 (Ref:3378436) | #40 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 8,088
|
Ideal weight that they want Hulkenberg at:
62 kg! |
|
|
14 Mar 2014, 13:38 (Ref:3378588) | #41 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 437
|
It's turning from the world driver's championship to the world dieter's championship
|
||
|
15 Mar 2014, 01:23 (Ref:3378803) | #42 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 8,088
|
Quote:
There must be some sort of health and safety issue involved here, a man with so few reserves left in his system will have impaired stamina and concentration, it will also affect their resistance to injury in an accident and their chances of recovery from injury. |
||
|
16 Mar 2014, 23:00 (Ref:3380827) | #43 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,214
|
Sutil looked bone thin as well. It seems ratehr easy to have a driver and his moulded seat a weight of 80-85kgs. That way the mass is carried in the same position for all cars and teams, Its silly that a very talkented guy who is 78kgs has to carry the disadvantage of bieng 16kgs heavier than another.
In the days where racing wasnt to close, different engines and fuel consumptions etc it was another grey area. Now with the respective pace of so many cars you cant give away that sort of advantage |
|
__________________
We may not always get what we want...as long as we dont get what we deserve. |
30 Mar 2014, 03:51 (Ref:3386328) | #44 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 8,088
|
Now we have drivers dehydrating themselves to save weight for qualifying!
http://www.grandprix.com/ns/ns27642.html In a dehydrated state the driver has less fluid surrounding his brain, and a far greater risk of brain injury in a crash! Martin Brundle mentioned that one of the drivers passed out during a press conference in Malaysia, apparently as a result of dieting and low blood sugar, what is going to happen if this occurs during a race? Brundle refused to name the driver, does anyone know who it was? I know from my point of view, but this is a serious and unfair situation, just plain ridiculous! Burns my bits, this does - more band members required! |
|
|
30 Mar 2014, 16:41 (Ref:3386681) | #45 | |
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 131
|
I think it could be a good idea.
I mean give the drivers a set weight slightly over the heaviest drivers weight so he is not at a disadvantage then give the cars a minimum weight with that set weight added on. i.e make a 600kg car and added set driver weight to that. Seems wrong the lengths that the drivers have to go to inorder to race. |
|
__________________
I should be Steveaki13, but I set up my username wrong. |
30 Mar 2014, 20:49 (Ref:3386796) | #46 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 42,467
|
Why didn't drivers do these unhealthy things before their was a combined weight limit. It was even more important then?
|
||
__________________
Seriously not taking motorsport too seriously. |
30 Mar 2014, 23:35 (Ref:3386864) | #47 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,349
|
Quote:
The truth is there may be another 50, 100, or 150, young men, and women, who could drive F1 cars faster than half to 75% of our F1 field but will never have the opportunity because of the convoluted way our rules are bound up and written. They direct their efforts into other forms of motorsport that provide other opportunities or forsake the sport altogether and do things that are more productive and even-handed than F1 |
||
|
31 Mar 2014, 07:45 (Ref:3386953) | #48 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 42,467
|
First paragraph: yes.
Second paragraph. The solution to this needs a more convoluted rule to allow for the different weights. We had weight if car. Simple. Now we have weight plus driver. More convoluted. We need car weight and driver plus ballast/seat/defined position weight. Very convoluted. A lot of these rules become convoluted due to the demands placed upon the sport. |
||
__________________
Seriously not taking motorsport too seriously. |
31 Mar 2014, 09:22 (Ref:3386973) | #49 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,349
|
Quote:
some people believe that if you don't like something then you write a rule about it and rule books are full of badly written rules, created to deal with a particular issue that someone has a bee in their bonnet over. A rule gets written and adopted but its often badly written or at odds with other aspects of basic competition common sense and gets upheld by people who really don't have a clue how to integrate the new rule with the rest of the rules, or use it in a legalistic way that partially or completely distorts the purpose for which it was intended, or is destructive to the way the basic principles of the way motorsport should be governed and administrated. |
||
|
31 Mar 2014, 18:28 (Ref:3387146) | #50 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 42,467
|
I don't think that this rule is particularly badly written, it is just we feel it is no longer appropriate.
|
||
__________________
Seriously not taking motorsport too seriously. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Driver weight in FF1600 | chris1600 | Club Level Single Seaters | 66 | 14 Nov 2007 10:58 |
Driver Parity: To Be Or Not To Be? | Chiefy | Formula One | 42 | 4 Nov 2007 02:37 |
EERC to possibly adopt power-to-weight parity | zac510 | National & Club Racing | 43 | 28 Nov 2006 10:21 |
TEGA Introduce Parity System | wishbone | Australasian Touring Cars. | 6 | 10 Sep 2002 05:03 |
Driver and car weight | Russfeld | National & International Single Seaters | 2 | 10 Aug 2002 10:44 |