Welcoming AmericanLeMansFans refugees.

 
Home Forum News F1 Predictions T-Shirts etc.: Europe/Worldwide. eBay Motorsport Links Advertising IRC Chat  
Site Partners: Race Cars For Sale Crash.Net MarshalsGuide.com MotorsportAds MotorsTV » 24-05 21:00 : BRITISH HISTORIC RALLY CHAMPIONSHIP RD 3 : PIRELLI HISTORIC RALLY  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   10-Tenths Motorsport Forum > Saloon & Sportscar Racing > Australasian Touring Cars.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 6 Jun 2009, 08:42   #16
GTRMagic
Race Official
1% Club
 
GTRMagic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Australia
In the infamous "Powder Room"
Posts: 32,651
GTRMagic is going for a new lap record!GTRMagic is going for a new lap record!GTRMagic is going for a new lap record!GTRMagic is going for a new lap record!GTRMagic is going for a new lap record!GTRMagic is going for a new lap record!
The larger issue here is that the branding this series has is intrinsically linked to V8's. Whatever CoT work is completed will have to incorporate a V8 engine, bespoke or unbranded, or sourced from a particular manufacturer.

How would other manufacturers view this kind of thing? If a carmaker does not have a V8 in their range, would they be bothered to enter a V8Supercar branded series?

It would be relatively simple, given enough $$, to build a V8-engined Hyundai Sonata, Nissan Maxima, Mazda 6, Toyota Avalon and so forth... but is there any benefit in such a thing for a carmaker, as the product they sell wouldnt have the kinds of specifications as the car being raced.

While some people get excited at the fact that the V8Supercar is really only a silhouette of the road car, the great unwashed pretty much dont know that... but if you were to start getting excited about an Avalon V8, and you cant buy one (whereas you can buy an SS/XR8 or HSV/FPV) would there be any point?

How would the conversion happen? Throwing out all the existing equipment, and rendering it worthless overnight? Sounds like a fun plan
GTRMagic is offline  
__________________
"Once you get in the right frame of mind, I think anything’s possible. I think we get, we so often get caught in this state of negativity and it’s a, it’s a poison like nothing else" - Pat Solatano Jr, Silver Linings Playbook

Excelsior...
Quote
Old 6 Jun 2009, 08:44   #17
Pro Racer
Veteran
 
Pro Racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Australia
Earth
Posts: 9,086
Pro Racer should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
well if this happens i'll give it a chance but i think i will lose abitof interest.

why can't we just go back to a Group A/C formula, real cars, best racing in those era's and you would imagine now there would be more teams with bigger budgets so the racing would be even better.
Pro Racer is offline  
Quote
Old 7 Jun 2009, 00:16   #18
Rachel Richards
Racer
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Wake Island
In a small house by the sea
Posts: 416
Rachel Richards should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Razor View Post
A production based touring car championship? I'm all for it. Just a stock standard road car with a roll cage, race seat and safety harness and that's it with the car modifcations. I wonder if the VESA heads and their endless wisdom would allow for it
Series Production, bring it on !
Rachel Richards is offline  
__________________
Bring on the Endurance season, and some big name DNF's...
(I'd love to see the V8 Chumpionship decided @ Winton, thus making the El Grande Finale the flop it deserves to be...)
Quote
Old 9 Jun 2009, 02:35   #19
Green Hornet
Racer
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 182
Green Hornet should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rachel Richards View Post
Series Production, bring it on !
Errr . . . we already have that - called the Manufacturers Championship in its latest guise, and nobody has gone to watch Series Production for years.

Compared to V8s all the other categories have very poor crowds so why would you advocate a change to that?
Green Hornet is offline  
__________________
Smith & Weston - the original point and click interface.
Quote
Old 9 Jun 2009, 03:07   #20
F J Nedos
Veteran
 
F J Nedos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Australia
Canberra
Posts: 1,077
F J Nedos should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Green Hornet View Post
Errr . . . we already have that - called the Manufacturers Championship in its latest guise, and nobody has gone to watch Series Production for years.

Compared to V8s all the other categories have very poor crowds so why would you advocate a change to that?
I dare say that if all of the major names (drivers, teams, sponsors) moved to a production based series, then the people would follow. That is what it seems to be about... marketing, names, profiles.

Will VESA want to break from a "parity" format? Doubt it... but it would be good. I still want to see way less reliance on downforce and way more rubber on the road.

The COT is already here in ways. You cant get a 5 litre holden or ford, the holden is shortened in length from the factory (and I am guessing the Ford is too), the interior is nothing like the factory car. By calling it COT, all you are doing is changing the marketing.
F J Nedos is offline  
__________________
I'm not saying "let's go and kill all the stupid people"... I'm just saying "let's remove all of the warning labels and let the problem sort itself out".
Quote
Old 9 Jun 2009, 03:59   #21
Razor
10-10ths offical Trekkie
Veteran
 
Razor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Australia
Yes! Front row!!!
Posts: 3,356
Razor should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridRazor should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by F J Nedos View Post
Will VESA want to break from a "parity" format? Doubt it, but it would be good. I still want to see way less reliance on downforce and way more rubber on the road.
I'll have to agree with you on that comment. Is anyone a fan of the reliance on wings? Most drivers are not fans of the idea of massive amounts of areodynamical grip. I remember a few years ago that Glenn Seton saying that his perfect V8 Touring Series would see the abolishment of big wings and areo devices in return for really grippy slicks and I agree with his sayings.

Quote:
Originally Posted by F J Nedos View Post
The COT is already here in ways. You can't get a 5 litre engined Holden or Ford, the Holden is shortened in length from the factory (and I am guessing the Ford is too), the interior is nothing like the factory car. By calling it COT, all you are doing is changing the marketing.
The FG Falcon has been shortened, in both length and breadth and has a lower roofline so it is in the same specific measurements as the BF Falcon and VE Commodore. So in every way possible, the COT is here in Aus aswell.
Razor is offline  
Quote
Old 9 Jun 2009, 06:28   #22
Crash Test
Veteran
 
Crash Test's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Australia
Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,192
Crash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridCrash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Except without a spec chassis design, which I think is what they are aiming at. Did I read somewhere that a Nascar COT spec chassis cost something like US$50K to build? There's no reason why you couldn't do a similar thing here, and wind up with something very similar to the end product that is already in use. $50K is less than an all fangled $330K new FG...
Crash Test is offline  
__________________
Love you long time
Quote
Old 9 Jun 2009, 06:49   #23
chevy34
Racer
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
New Zealand
Timaru, South Island, NZ
Posts: 104
chevy34 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Sounds like the SCCA Trans-am series to me?
chevy34 is offline  
Quote
Old 9 Jun 2009, 06:51   #24
Crash Test
Veteran
 
Crash Test's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Australia
Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,192
Crash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridCrash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Yeah, but as is proven by the current cars you can build a space frame car and still retain the basic look of the donor car.
Crash Test is offline  
__________________
Love you long time
Quote
Old 9 Jun 2009, 07:15   #25
chevy34
Racer
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
New Zealand
Timaru, South Island, NZ
Posts: 104
chevy34 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
The last of the Trans-am cars where very good looking cars and there where Jags with Ford motors Talk of a Merc with a Mopar sounds like a good idea to me. And the last of the Rocketsports Jags ran a 4ltr 4 cam V8 on injection against the 311ci pushrod carb motors and won races so why cant Toyota and Nissan get in there or toyota could use the NASCAR engine as a base.
chevy34 is offline  
Quote
Old 9 Jun 2009, 08:46   #26
Y.N.M
Rookie
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 9
Y.N.M should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crash Test View Post
Yeah, but as is proven by the current cars you can build a space frame car and still retain the basic look of the donor car.
The current cars aren't actualy a spaceframe chassis. They still use the production car shell although shortened and strengthened in areas.

I reckon its just becoming too much about marketing for Ford and Holden. Most team's don't have the backing from them now anyway so I don't see why the cars become to distant from the production counter-parts should be a problem in that sense? If they think that people want to drive what the guys are racing that could be a valid point but i think that would only apply to a small percentage of the fans. Most true racing fans would probably much rather watch guys racing proper race cars than a road car with slicks! I know I would.

Racing should be about technology and the cars just as much as driver talent. Maybe a budget cap and technical freedom like Formula 1 is introducing would keep the racing close (although I think v8 is probably one of the closest categories you'll find).

Think the organisers better be careful or they could loose more than they gain
Y.N.M is offline  
Quote
Old 9 Jun 2009, 23:08   #27
RotorFan
Veteran
 
RotorFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Australia
Sydney
Posts: 2,219
RotorFan should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Preposterous. My interest is already low in V8 Supercars. This will be the final nail though.


Just go to S2000/improved production for fug's sake and be done with it. Its cheap, its relevant and provides great racing.
RotorFan is offline  
__________________
Phil Mills: 30, 6-Left-Plus Over-Crest-Long, Opens-Over-Crest 100, COW-COW, 100, 6-Left-Minus Extra-Long

Fabrizio Giovanardi: I have like a banana - is the yellow car in front - that make me, you know, running like the monkey, running for the banana. When I see yellow in front, I just pushing harder and harder. I want that banana.
Quote
Old 10 Jun 2009, 02:25   #28
dsg
Subscriber
Veteran
 
dsg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Thailand
Soi Nanai
Posts: 1,916
dsg should be qualifying in the top 10 on the griddsg should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I like the COT idea, albeit with a few more freedoms in engine choice. Or another way of looking at it is as a more restricted class of sports sedans. Production cars work ok in rallying but on circuits I have never found them very interesting. I prefer to watch racing cars over road cars.
dsg is offline  
__________________
โฮเวอร์คราฟท์ของฉันเต็มไปด้วยปลาไหล
Quote
Old 10 Jun 2009, 02:58   #29
profi
Racer
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Australia
Melbourne
Posts: 165
profi should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by touring fan01 View Post
Spaceframe chassis. Silhouette body. Generic V8 engine and a load of fixed components (suspension, gearbox, diff, brakes, aerodynamics etc).

In other words they will all be exactly the same as each other underneath, clothed in panels to look like whatever model you want.

Welcome to the "Car Of Tomorrow" folks......
Thats how they are now, fabricated floorpan, wheelbase shortened, most panels are composite, both run a ford style head, 9" diffs.

I would like to see them allow more current technology freedoms. go more along the dtm line, that works you have the Mercedes and audi rivalry even though everyone knows that they are not...

To be honest a supercar is harder to pick visually (holden or ford) over a dtm car (audi or mecedes).

bring in more manufacturers and more fredoms is my thinking.
profi is offline  
Quote
Old 10 Jun 2009, 03:09   #30
Razor
10-10ths offical Trekkie
Veteran
 
Razor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Australia
Yes! Front row!!!
Posts: 3,356
Razor should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridRazor should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crash Test View Post
Except without a spec chassis design, which I think is what they are aiming at. Did I read somewhere that a Nascar COT spec chassis cost something like US$50K to build? There's no reason why you couldn't do a similar thing here, and wind up with something very similar to the end product that is already in use. $50K is less than an all fangled $330K new FG...
But you must remember Crash Test, NASCAR chassis only used for a couple of races per year, unlike V8 Supercars which are used all year.
Razor is offline  
Quote
Reply

Bookmarks




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[V8SC07R10] The BATTLE for BATHURST (Merged x4) billy bigtime Australasian Touring Cars. 593 16 Oct 2007 04:50
NASCAR Copying V8Supercar? (MERGED) Robert Ryan Australasian Touring Cars. 27 1 Mar 2007 18:04
Who will win the V8Supercar Driver's Championship in Season 2007? (MERGED) GTRMagic Australasian Touring Cars. 76 11 Jan 2007 09:07
Arnie maybe a future US President... but he cant take Supercars off the air (merged) retro Australasian Touring Cars. 36 18 Nov 2004 10:22
Congratulations/Jacques Villeneuve's Future... (merged) CobraSVT Formula One 91 1 Oct 2003 21:44


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:58.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2013 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.

Site Partners: GolfScoreSaver| MotorsportWorldNews| Love your BMW