 |
|
14 Nov 2010, 20:24
|
#1
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,269
|
Yas Marina 2011
Obviously, a fantastic facility and a visually stunning place for a Grand Prix. But could the circuit be tweeked slightly to be more fun to drive and possibly provide better overtaking opportunities?
I had a little play with the layout:
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
It would take relativley little work to complete and would improve the place in my opinion.
Source picture: http://automiddleeast.com/wp-content...na-Circuit.jpg
|
|
|
14 Nov 2010, 21:40
|
#2
|
 Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,179
|
Looks like you have linked to the thumbnail rather than the full size image.
|
|
__________________
ScotsBrutesFan
AKA Big Al.
International V8 Utes Fanclub
|
14 Nov 2010, 21:55
|
#3
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,269
|
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Ah, we'll try this one!
|
|
|
14 Nov 2010, 21:59
|
#4
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,269
|
I am not entirely happy with my solution for the hairpin leading onto the main straight. But, the track 'needs' to run right into that stadium grandstand otherwise its a waste of time.
One of the problems i have noticed and tried to remedy is that the 2 current braking zones are into chicanes which force the the cars into line-a-stirn formation. Hopefully with this configuration, the overtaken car has a chance to grab the place back at the following corner.
Would love to hear your thoughts.
|
|
|
14 Nov 2010, 22:20
|
#5
|
|
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 245
|
This might seem strange but I'd keep the circuit exactly like it is...
But I'd run it in the opposite direction.
It might be a bit of a problem reconfiguring some of the track with limited runoff, but I think it would actually improve the passing opportunities.
|
|
|
15 Nov 2010, 00:51
|
#6
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2007
|
Budapest, Hungary, Europe |
Posts: 1,810
|
I don't see the improvement here, to be frank...
Sorry
bio
|
|
|
15 Nov 2010, 05:03
|
#7
|
|
Racer
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 354
|
Only thing I'd like done is for the cars to take the S-bend they bypass after turn 3. Otherwise I don't think there is anything wrong with the circuit, it's the cars that can't overtake. Watch the V8SC (which they take the infield sort of corkscrew bypass, pretty good layout, possibly even for F1, but that won't happen because there are no stands) or GT1 races, tons of action.
|
|
|
15 Nov 2010, 14:13
|
#8
|
 Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,179
|
2 minor mods from me, though the first will cause more issues than it solves, namely the stupid and gimicky pit exit.
First do away with T4 and move the longer straight "infield" a bit, with the chicane then right-left (opposite of current) this would give F1 cars the larger radius hairpin leading onto the back straight.
Alternately knock a hole in the grandstand like they have done at the other end of the long straight creating run off, and allow F1 cars through T4 all the way along the straight to the hairpin.
Secondly at the other fast section, does the circuit actually need another chicane. The 90 left is fair enough, but why not then continue into an opening left hander that then feeds into the "street" section.
|
|
__________________
ScotsBrutesFan
AKA Big Al.
International V8 Utes Fanclub
|
15 Nov 2010, 19:02
|
#9
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,626
|
I like that, SBF.
My one preference in sector 1 would be to still use T2 and 3, but add the next set of curves to it, too (you can see a left/right kink just after them). That way you'd have the potential to bypass the chicane before the hairpin, which I think potentially kills the opportunity for an overtake in to the hairpin.
Selby
|
|
__________________
Run-offs, chicanes, hairpins...
Think you can do better? Let's see it!
Check out the "My Tracks" forum here on Ten-Tenths.
|
18 Nov 2010, 21:12
|
#10
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,764
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Birddog07
Only thing I'd like done is for the cars to take the S-bend they bypass after turn 3. Otherwise I don't think there is anything wrong with the circuit, it's the cars that can't overtake. Watch the V8SC (which they take the infield sort of corkscrew bypass, pretty good layout, possibly even for F1, but that won't happen because there are no stands) or GT1 races, tons of action.
|
Yes.
Its the cars that are the problem more than the circuit but there seems to be a lack of hearing in F1.
Until they wake up to the fact that excessive aero generated down force and wake turbulance is the reason they will not make progress.
The ideas displayed have some merit. Getting rid of the chicane before the street/marina section is a good idea but I would still like to see the esses sweeping up to the start of the main straight.
|
|
|
18 Nov 2010, 23:40
|
#11
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,269
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Teretonga
Yes.
Its the cars that are the problem more than the circuit but there seems to be a lack of hearing in F1.
|
You say that, but even the GP2 boys were having difficulties passing. usually ended in contact/spins. The main stops are pinched too tight.
|
|
|
19 Nov 2010, 02:42
|
#12
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,764
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peat
You say that, but even the GP2 boys were having difficulties passing. usually ended in contact/spins. The main stops are pinched too tight.
|
This opens them up a bit..... in several places. The changes come in the turn 4-5 area, then at the end of the back straight where the chicane opens out into a faster right hander before leading up the back straight.
Once there the left-right-left chicane has been replaced in the second part by sweeping curves leading to a fast left hander on to come back towards the marina. The two right hand kinks have also been opened up into a longer double apex curve before the hard right hander. the rest of the lap is as per normal.
Its a hard cicuit to change too much because of all the building around it and i still think the problem with passing is the cars, not the circuits anyway. Yas Marina one included. The circuit design has exacerbated the car problems though.
Last edited by Teretonga; 19 Nov 2010 at 02:53.
|
|
|
19 Nov 2010, 16:23
|
#13
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,613
|
Adding more of those bends in ahead of Turns 5-7 is only going to hurt overtaking potential at that end of the circuit; so, SBF's proposal is the best in that respect.
If anything, tightenting Turn 8 and 9 will hurt overtaking into 11, becuase of the added impact on the accordion effect in those corners. And I don't think loosening up Turn 9 will help the racing noticeably, though it could make that sequence a bit more fun. Therefore, I could take or leave that change, Teretonga.
Turns 11-13 as they are can set up some interesting criss-cross passing maneuvers. If I did change that sequence, I'd go with Teretonga's version, I think. I do like the changes Teretonga has made to Turns 14-16, though passing into 17 will always be rather tricky, as you are still carrying the cornering loads from Turn 16 when you have to hit the brakes for 17.
If it were up to me, I'd just go straight past the Turn 5-6 chicane into the Turn 7 hairpin. I would also loosen up Turn 20. After that, I'd strongly consider redoing Turns 12-16 as Teretonga has them in his diagram.
|
|
__________________
The only certainty is that nothing is certain.
|
21 Nov 2010, 08:00
|
#14
|
|
Subscriber
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,033
|
Here's mine, just some changing of minor things.
|
|
|
21 Nov 2010, 11:52
|
#15
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 686
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt
Here's mine, just some changing of minor things.
|
Yeh, that one is the sort of thing I'd do too - just simplify bits of it.
|
|
__________________
Please, call me dye.
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|