 |
|
31 Jul 2012, 22:13
|
#31
|
|
Subscriber
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,388
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrapezeArtist
Hmmm! Yes, I didn't think of that. 
|
In all seriousness: the SC came about eventually because drivers take (took) no notice of flags. This still happens (also in series with FIVs such as the various NASCAR sanctioned series). Where do we end - FCY or red flag for everything in all series? I hope not.
|
|
|
1 Aug 2012, 07:43
|
#32
|
|
Pie On 'ere
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,313
|
Yellow flag infringement + two witnesses = Immediate exclusion from meeting. No appeal.
' Bet that would change things pretty damn quick.
|
|
__________________
A curious fact missed by evolutionists is that most teenagers can speak fluent Chimp.
|
1 Aug 2012, 23:38
|
#33
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,771
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by numbersix
Yellow flag infringement + two witnesses = Immediate exclusion from meeting. No appeal.
' Bet that would change things pretty damn quick.
|
The trouble with showing yellow flags and allowing the race to continue, is the race is still on and the drivers are still racing and pushing every rule they can find to the limit. They may not be overtaking one another but they are still trying to make time on each other with all the attendent risks.
The safety car stops the race, bunches the field and allows the emergency crew safe access on a clear track. The practice of weaving to warm tyres should be banned under the safety car, run another lap in race order after the safety car pulls off to warm the tyres, or just deal with it, it's the same for everyone!
The only alternative, is Greem's red flag the race and restart.
Last edited by wnut; 1 Aug 2012 at 23:49.
|
|
|
2 Aug 2012, 00:00
|
#34
|
 Official Timekeeper!
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,431
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wolfhound
If one goes to Holland they have a system similar to what nicanary has suggested called code 60. They use a special flag and all drivers have to slow to 60km/h.
|
Yes indeed, purple flags shown at all marshals posts. I haven't been at a race meeting where it's been used, but from what I've heard it seems to be a very effective way of neutralising the race.
|
|
|
3 Aug 2012, 07:54
|
#35
|
|
Pie On 'ere
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,313
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wnut
The trouble with showing yellow flags and allowing the race to continue, is the race is still on and the drivers are still racing and pushing every rule they can find to the limit.
|
They are not racing (should not!) within the yellow flag zones.
Quote:
Originally Posted by wnut
They may not be overtaking one another but they are still trying to make time on each other with all the attendent risks.
|
The rules are very clear, they must slow down as well as not overtake.
Quote:
Originally Posted by wnut
The safety car stops the race,
|
No.
Quote:
Originally Posted by wnut
bunches the field
|
No. That's the objective, but cars are allowed to play catch up in various ways so you don't know who's where, and they are catching up at speed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by wnut
and allows the emergency crew safe access on a clear track.
|
Uhh!!!! No way. Have you ever been out there? I'll admit that is the ideal but the fact is that it rarely happens.
Quote:
Originally Posted by wnut
The practice of weaving to warm tyres should be banned under the safety car, run another lap in race order after the safety car pulls off to warm the tyres, or just deal with it, it's the same for everyone!
|
I'd like to see something like that. Whether it's technically feasible I'll let the experts decide.
|
|
__________________
A curious fact missed by evolutionists is that most teenagers can speak fluent Chimp.
|
3 Aug 2012, 14:00
|
#36
|
|
20KPINAL
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,238
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by numbersix
I'd like to see something like that. Whether it's technically feasible I'll let the experts decide.
|
Drivers try to warm their tyres up in order not to have an accident when the race is started again. So not allowing them to do so, may be counter-productive to what the safety car was called out for in the first place, i.e. to avoid more accidents.
|
|
__________________
All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.-- Galileo Galilei
|
3 Aug 2012, 16:49
|
#37
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,122
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by numbersix
They are not racing (should not!) within the yellow flag zones.
The rules are very clear, they must slow down as well as not overtake.
|
How much should the drivers slow down by? Please quantify it, and in such a way that the drivers can actually do that.
Because in real life, you slow down the minimum amount you think you can get away with, and at the same time you hope that the cars in front and behind slow down a little more.
What you don't want to happen is that you slow down more than everyone else, particularly if you've been closing on the car ahead slowly or pulling away from the guy behind.
The drivers, in the car, with their visors down, don't give two monkeys about the safety of the car in the wall or the orange workers besides the track. They care about maximising their race result. They might BE a marshall 49 weeks of the year, but if they are a competitive driver they still won't care about marshals whilst driving (not, obviously, to the extreme of WANTING to hurt them or not minding if they hit them).
As the rules are "slow down", 0.00001mph and a fractional lift of the throttle is technically obeying. Clearly that isn't enough. Is 1mph? 2mph? One gear lower than they wouldn't normally be in (but of course you'd be hitting the rev limiter in that lower gear to minimise the slowing down)?
If you can't quantify it (and I suspect you can't) then please come up with a better yellow flag rule.
Also (a late addition) - when there are yellow flags and the drivers are compelled to slow down against all their instincts and trying not to slow down any more than anyone else, and they see a car miles away in a safe place with the driver safely out of the way and no marshals for miles and miles, then they will stop slowing down and start going fast again - is that wrong? How is that actually any different from what 99% of people do in 30mph speed limit zones - they see the national speed limit sigh 500m ahead, and start to gradually accelerate, even though they are still in the road equivalent of a yellow flag zone. Is it okay do to this on the road when not competing, but not when on a track when every 100th of a second counts?
|
|
__________________
Dallara F307 Toyota, MSV F3 Cup - Class and Team Champion 2012
Monoposto Champion 2008, 2010 & 2011.
|
3 Aug 2012, 21:36
|
#38
|
|
Subscriber
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,388
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tristancliffe
Also (a late addition) - when there are yellow flags and the drivers are compelled to slow down against all their instincts and trying not to slow down any more than anyone else, and they see a car miles away in a safe place with the driver safely out of the way and no marshals for miles and miles, then they will stop slowing down and start going fast again - is that wrong? How is that actually any different from what 99% of people do in 30mph speed limit zones - they see the national speed limit sigh 500m ahead, and start to gradually accelerate, even though they are still in the road equivalent of a yellow flag zone. Is it okay do to this on the road when not competing, but not when on a track when every 100th of a second counts?
|
Just because a risk can't be seen doesn't mean it isn't there. The pedestrian who trips and falls into the road unexpectedly is the same as the orange suited person still climbing the wall to get away. The flag signals are *almost always* (nobody is perfect) indicating something is a risk. Ignoring them because you can't see the risk... well, that's a related but separate discussion.
|
|
|
3 Aug 2012, 22:57
|
#39
|
|
Pie On 'ere
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,313
|
The flag rule is fine. Drivers who are racing are on the very edge of adhesion and control. That is defined by their lap times. They must slow down so that they are in control and can take evading action. The object is not the slowing down. The object is to have the car totally under control and prepared to take evading action without risk of losing that control. It's usually achieved by backing off.
And yes, it involves losing/gaining distance, but so does a Safety Car which slows everything down by several laps. Tough.
And as for "not giving a monkey's", I suggest that being sent home a couple of times would soon refocus a driver's priorities, and if it doesn't, perhaps he should consider demonstrating his I.Q. in a different sport.
|
|
__________________
A curious fact missed by evolutionists is that most teenagers can speak fluent Chimp.
|
5 Aug 2012, 10:11
|
#40
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 12,978
|
As the Hockenheim incident was early in the race, the officials probably should have played it safe and beployed the safety car. I can't imagine that a system to mark out the positions of debris on the track is plausible. However, in dry conditions, common sense should be enough to avoid most other incidents. Immediate exclusion for infringing yellow flag limits ('delta' times make this quite easy to judge) should allow the number of safety car periods to be reduced.
My main issue with the safety car is that it is over-used. I can't understand the need to use it any more frequently than the red flag was used before it was introduced - unless drivers have become less capable of observing yellow flags or cars have started to give off debris more easily than 20 years ago. I appreciate that the safety car makes races less likely to overrun, which is helpful for TV schedules and allows for more races in a single meeting, but it is inherently unfair and should be kept to a minimum.
|
|
|
6 Aug 2012, 14:09
|
#41
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,122
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greem
Just because a risk can't be seen doesn't mean it isn't there. The pedestrian who trips and falls into the road unexpectedly is the same as the orange suited person still climbing the wall to get away. The flag signals are *almost always* (nobody is perfect) indicating something is a risk. Ignoring them because you can't see the risk... well, that's a related but separate discussion.
|
Drivers tend to ignore certain risks and choose to take other risks. I don't drive down the road thinking everyone might fall over, and I don't race thinking like that either. I've seen a lot of pointless yellow flags both as a driver and a spectator.
|
|
__________________
Dallara F307 Toyota, MSV F3 Cup - Class and Team Champion 2012
Monoposto Champion 2008, 2010 & 2011.
|
9 Aug 2012, 00:02
|
#42
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,771
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tristancliffe
Drivers tend to ignore certain risks and choose to take other risks. I don't drive down the road thinking everyone might fall over, and I don't race thinking like that either. I've seen a lot of pointless yellow flags both as a driver and a spectator.
|
That is exactly why the safety car is a good idea.
|
|
|
10 Aug 2012, 16:46
|
#43
|
|
Pie On 'ere
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,313
|
Safety cars were rare beasties years ago. Now they are common practice every weekend, everywhere.
And it's a choice that drivers have made which I do not understand.
A safety car invention messes up several laps, makes leading cars lose hard-earned advantage by closing up, and I can't believe for one minute that a racer who has paid a fair chunk of money on entry fees is happy to spend it going round in convoy.
Most yellow flag situations are between to two flag points only. Outside of those points the drivers can race their whatsits off. That involves a fraction of one lap.
And yet, drivers choose - by 'not giving a monkeys' as my learned colleague so aptly phrased it, the safety car over the flags.
It's a lose-lose situation and I really don't understand why drivers have chosen that option. They can unchange it overnight by changing this rabid desire to be on the podium at any cost - including the safety of those who risk their own welfare to be the first to their blazing wrecks when all sensible people will be running away.
|
|
__________________
A curious fact missed by evolutionists is that most teenagers can speak fluent Chimp.
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|