 |
|
6 Aug 2012, 04:00
|
#1
|
|
Racer
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 478
|
Where's Dallara?
Today I was thinking about the future of sportscar racing and tried imaging Le Mans without a Lola and then something came to my mind. What happened to Dallara? I mean, these are the guys who helped with the R8 and that Chrysler prototype. I know they have been active with Grand-Am and Indycar in the recent past and present but any chance of them returning to ACO racing any time soon?
|
|
|
6 Aug 2012, 04:21
|
#3
|
|
Racer
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 478
|
Wow I just had a brain fart there!  Thanks GT3.14!
|
|
|
6 Aug 2012, 05:27
|
#4
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
|
Location:
|
Innsbruck , Austria |
Posts: 13,253
|
Thinking about what De Chaunac said , that Oreca isnt interested in making a new chassis , cuz theres no money in it , where does that leave other chassis builders , such as Dallara ?
|
|
|
6 Aug 2012, 12:28
|
#5
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,465
|
Its about volume. If you make 50 chassis of the same design then theres profit - if you make 5, its hard to make a profit.
|
|
__________________
Chase the horizon
|
6 Aug 2012, 12:57
|
#6
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
|
Location:
|
Innsbruck , Austria |
Posts: 13,253
|
That answer isnt really relevant to our type of racing .
|
|
|
6 Aug 2012, 14:18
|
#7
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,152
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Badger
That answer isnt really relevant to our type of racing .
|
That answer is relevant to everything made on our planet. There needs to be a certain number of anything made, in order to turn a profit. Otherwise you need to sell them for such a huge price, that nobody will buy any.
The market is no longer big enough for boutique manufacturers to bother building chassis, nor engine. Houston, we have a problem.
|
|
|
6 Aug 2012, 15:59
|
#8
|
 Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 2,332
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fogelhund
Houston, we have a problem.
|
I am not sure what can be done? Anyone have an idea?
I have heard crash testing and carbon listed over the years as the problem, or at least some of them. But, having seen multiple accidents now where the driver survived, as an example the Audi accidents at LeMans last year, makes me not want to move away from that level of protection.
That said, the cost of a GT these days stuns also-and not just a Porsche or Ferrari, but the cars running in smaller or lower tech classes is equally stunning.
|
|
__________________
You live and learn. At any rate, you live.
Douglas Adams
|
6 Aug 2012, 16:19
|
#9
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,152
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by skycafe
I am not sure what can be done? Anyone have an idea?
|
Ensuring the biggest market possible, increasing the genre appeal across all series, stable rules, engine rules that allow for privateers to compete, manufacturer support and dollars across all series, competent series management, with a marketable TV broadcast.
|
|
|
6 Aug 2012, 16:29
|
#10
|
 Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 2,332
|
Right, I would agree with that. When it comes to engine rules and stability of those, isn't the influence of hybrid technology and other efficiency improvements going to have the effect of destabilizing, because of the development/operational costs?
Also, you want manufacturers to provide a product in a turnkey car that is available. The quantity they would need to provide becomes a challenge-what is the market?
|
|
__________________
You live and learn. At any rate, you live.
Douglas Adams
|
6 Aug 2012, 17:13
|
#11
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
|
Location:
|
Innsbruck , Austria |
Posts: 13,253
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fogelhund
The market is no longer big enough for boutique manufacturers to bother building chassis, nor engine. Houston, we have a problem.
|
Yes , I agree , so if nobody is interested in building chassis , then there is a design flaw that needs to be addressed , otherwise there there wont be anything to address .
Is it CF thats driving up the price ? While CF is not so expensive , the process for layup , autoclave and the need to ship the chaiisi back to the manufacturer for repair is . Plus crap like hybrid technology doesnt help either .
Fine , if you like to see technology , thats cool , I like it too but , if its deminishing the grids , I would rather not see it .
|
|
|
6 Aug 2012, 17:54
|
#12
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,152
|
I don't believe the cost of materials for chassis, CF etc. are the major factor here.
There is a fixed cost in design, develop and tooling that are by far the bigger issue. These need to be amortized across a number of sales.
We really need some developed chassis, such as the Porsche 962, 955, Spyder etc. that can be purchased at a price that they can be sold in numbers, and be competitive. Certainly a developed HPD in LMP1 should fall in the same category, if the ACO could come up with the equivalency of non-hybrid/diesel engines correctly. The gap between the manufacturers and privateers needs to be closed, even if artificially. There should be a probability of an upset win from the privateers on pace, even if it is still improbable.
There has been far too much pandering to Peugeot in particular, but manufacturers as a whole and short-term thinking.
How can they encourage the build and sale of developed competitive machinery? Can they give breaks to privateer machinery, such as weight breaks to true privateers running manufacturer equipment? Should manufacturer points be based upon all cars entered, with stricter rules around true manufacturer teams?
Last edited by Fogelhund; 6 Aug 2012 at 18:06.
|
|
|
6 Aug 2012, 20:37
|
#13
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 969
|
If you look at what Dallara builds now, they are effectively a builder of spec chassis racing cars and do not build cars in race series that offer strong chassis design competition.
|
|
|
6 Aug 2012, 21:42
|
#14
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,379
|
Well, everybody that tried to compete went away, e.g. Lola in F3 or G-Force/Panoz in Indycar.
|
|
|
7 Aug 2012, 00:30
|
#15
|
 Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 2,332
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wolfhound
If you look at what Dallara builds now, they are effectively a builder of spec chassis racing cars and do not build cars in race series that offer strong chassis design competition.
|
Coupled with a designer and program to run it, I wouldn't doubt that Dallara could produce a winning bespoke car. Their business model of 'mass production' is working for them and gives them economic stability, and results in well built series of cars at stable prices, which is good for the feeder series. They have made themselves somewhat immune to the boom and bust cycles we saw with March and Lola back in the Cart days, where one year you sold twenty chassis and the next year one because someone else was percieved to have the better option. You can not really keep a state of the art facility and staff when you have swings like that.
|
|
__________________
You live and learn. At any rate, you live.
Douglas Adams
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
| Thread |
Thread Starter |
Forum |
Replies |
Last Post |
|
Dallara f302-4
|
Gary C |
Club Level Single Seaters |
14 |
30 Oct 2012 09:14 |
|
Dallara SP1
|
rdjones |
The Chassis History Archive |
9 |
5 Jan 2008 11:47 |
|
Dallara and Rollcentre
|
JAG |
Sportscar & GT Racing |
17 |
29 Jan 2004 02:35 |
|
Doran-Dallara...
|
RacingManiac |
Sportscar & GT Racing |
8 |
12 Mar 2003 06:09 |
|
The new Dallara
|
mathieu |
IRL Indycar Series |
10 |
25 Jan 2003 19:10 |
|
|
|