 |
|
11 Aug 2005, 17:52
|
#1
|
|
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 444
|
Cosworth V8 - 20,000 RPM And Not Exploding!
How wos this possible? I don't even know how a normal bog standard road car engine works. Does anyone have any idea how they did this?
|
|
|
11 Aug 2005, 17:58
|
#2
|
|
20KPINAL
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,234
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by youngoldy
How wos this possible? I don't even know how a normal bog standard road car engine works. Does anyone have any idea how they did this?
|
By chopping 2 cylinders off a V10,would you believe.
|
|
__________________
All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.-- Galileo Galilei
|
11 Aug 2005, 18:01
|
#3
|
|
Incorrect voter.
20KPINAL
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 27,784
|
That was Ferrari wasn't it?
The Cosworth V8 that we have seen teh dyno test of was a true V8.
See this thread for a previous discussion on the Cossie V8: http://www.ten-tenths.com/forum/show...light=cosworth
|
|
|
11 Aug 2005, 18:11
|
#5
|
|
Incorrect voter.
20KPINAL
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 27,784
|
er, the thread I linked to was all about that video clip.
Looking at that video again, how can you tell it is a V10 with two missing cylinders? I can't see anything on the website saying it is a V10 with two pistons missing?????????
Last edited by Adam43; 11 Aug 2005 at 18:35.
|
|
|
11 Aug 2005, 23:10
|
#6
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,674
|
Its not its is definatly ferrari that have done this I remember when Ford said they are selling cosworth the head of cosworth said to carry on testing on V8 blocks and things.
|
|
__________________
The race track and the human body, both born of the earth, drive to be one with the earth, and through the earth one with the car,
drive to the undiminished dream, single moments of pleasure, an eternity of memories.
|
11 Aug 2005, 23:11
|
#7
|
|
20KPINAL
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,234
|
It was Ferrari who ran their V8 in a V10 case,so not a finished V8.
My original post was just a generalisation of F1 technology,since youngoldy didn't seem to be too aghast by the fact that the V10s were reaching 18-19,000 rpm or simply didn't know.
|
|
__________________
All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.-- Galileo Galilei
|
12 Aug 2005, 01:02
|
#8
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,211
|
I remember reading years ago about how an F1 engine if free-revved (ie no load) at wide open throttle for 10 seconds would reach 100,000 rpm assuming it held together that long. Note it was ~10 years ago so I am probably wrong on those figures!
|
|
|
12 Aug 2005, 05:50
|
#9
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,246
|
On a similar note to that posted above, i'd be interested to see how the Cossie would go on the track, whether that 20Krpm target is still achievable without further work
|
|
|
12 Aug 2005, 09:20
|
#10
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 7,491
|
I don't know about revs, but Honda's goal is 800 bhp with their V8.
|
|
|
14 Aug 2005, 12:24
|
#11
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 947
|
The V8's will be running more than 20,000 RPM definately.
As far as HP 780-820 would seem like a fairly decent, if not great effort in the engine department. But it all comes with development. Engines/tyres will develop and before we know it, the cars wont be any slower and the rule book will be once again re-written.
|
|
|
14 Aug 2005, 12:30
|
#12
|
|
Racer
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 404
|
next season when running the new v8's what will be the min weight limit???
|
|
__________________
Perfection is possible
|
14 Aug 2005, 13:15
|
#13
|
|
20KPINAL
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,234
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by pitcrew
next season when running the new v8's what will be the min weight limit???
|
95 kgs.for the engine.Total minimum is still 600 Kgs as far as i know.
|
|
__________________
All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.-- Galileo Galilei
|
14 Aug 2005, 15:26
|
#14
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
|
Castricum, The Netherlands |
Posts: 2,845
|
I don't like the minimum engine weight. Formula 1 was always about innovations. For the engines, it was not always about more RPM or BHP. In fact, the search for weight reductions slowed the increase of power a little bit.
|
|
|
14 Aug 2005, 15:59
|
#15
|
|
20KPINAL
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,234
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Pingguest
I don't like the minimum engine weight. Formula 1 was always about innovations. For the engines, it was not always about more RPM or BHP. In fact, the search for weight reductions slowed the increase of power a little bit.
|
There are other restrictions such as minimum distance between cylinders and maximum bore.So you end up with everyone having pretty much the same engine anyway.
|
|
__________________
All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.-- Galileo Galilei
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|