 |
|
29 Apr 2007, 00:50
|
#1
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 517
|
How does a seamless shift gearbox work?
In Formula 1 this year every competitive team is running a seamless shift gearbox. I would like to know how it works. Could anyone explain me what is the difference between a seamless shift gearbox and an automatic gearbox.
I know that John Barnard introduced the semi-automatic box on the Ferrari with the shifters in the early '90s. Then, a few years later came a gearbox shifted all by itself: it allowed the driver to race the car like a kart. Then the rules brought back the shifters on the steering wheel. So today I would like to know:
1) Is a seamless shift gearbox the same as a CVT (continously variable transmission?
2) Do drivers have to shift gears themself.
3) How many gears do these transmission have?
4) Do they have discreet ratios?
Thanks in advance
|
|
__________________
The Truth is: Williams FW18 & FW19 were THE most UNDER rated cars in history....
|
29 Apr 2007, 01:02
|
#2
|
 Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,623
|
|
|
|
29 Apr 2007, 03:18
|
#3
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,246
|
Theyre a development of the current gearboxes, in short. Still 7 speed, semi auto, driver shift controlled. Theyve just been modified so that the power isnt cut during shifts.
|
|
|
29 Apr 2007, 04:26
|
#4
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 3,320
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by karimbo
1) Is a seamless shift gearbox the same as a CVT (continously variable transmission?
|
No, it is'nt , because if it was it would be illegal, it has been banned ever since Williams tested it in 1994(it was to fast), now the car is in the VDT factory.
http://www.cke-tech.com/graphics/CVPST/CVT-test_car.jpg
|
|
|
29 Apr 2007, 15:35
|
#5
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,419
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by karimbo
In Formula 1 this year every competitive team is running a seamless shift gearbox. I would like to know how it works. Could anyone explain me what is the difference between a seamless shift gearbox and an automatic gearbox.
|
These are called sequential gearbox. Which also have electronic shifting no mechanical linkage.
BMW calls it thier SMG gear box. Porsche has their triptronic sequential gear box.
Many ppl call them "paddle shifters"
Info on differnt transmission:
http://www.autozine.org/technical_sc...ear_manual.htm
1) Is a seamless shift gearbox the same as a CVT (continously variable transmission? SEQUENTIAL
2) Do drivers have to shift gears themself. YES, right paddle UPshift, Left Paddle downshift
3) How many gears do these transmission have? 6 for road cars, 7 for F1 cars
4) Do they have discreet ratios? Road cars, yes, for the most part. Race cars the gear ratio is depended on the race circuit.
Last edited by AU N EGL; 29 Apr 2007 at 15:38.
|
|
__________________
"When the fear of death out weighs the thrill of speed, brake." LG
|
29 Apr 2007, 18:10
|
#6
|
|
Rookie
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 46
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by steve nielsen
No, it is'nt , because if it was it would be illegal, it has been banned ever since Williams tested it in 1994(it was to fast), now the car is in the VDT factory.
]
|
Actually it was tested in 1993...by David Coulthard
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x3UpBKXMRto
The seamless shift works in a very simply way...there is a point where 2 gears are selected at the same time....but one of them is ratcheting (the one to be selected) and when the driver clicks on the paddle the gear to be selected locks and the previous gear ratchets when the torque is applied to the selected gear.
|
|
|
29 Apr 2007, 18:50
|
#7
|
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 86
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by AU N EGL
These are called sequential gearbox. Which also have electronic shifting no mechanical linkage.
BMW calls it thier SMG gear box. Porsche has their triptronic sequential gear box.
Many ppl call them "paddle shifters"
Info on differnt transmission:
http://www.autozine.org/technical_sc...ear_manual.htm
1) Is a seamless shift gearbox the same as a CVT (continously variable transmission? SEQUENTIAL
2) Do drivers have to shift gears themself. YES, right paddle UPshift, Left Paddle downshift
3) How many gears do these transmission have? 6 for road cars, 7 for F1 cars
4) Do they have discreet ratios? Road cars, yes, for the most part. Race cars the gear ratio is depended on the race circuit.
|
Karimbo
The above statement is not correct AU N EGL is only talking about a sequential gearbox the Zeroshift is explained by Monstrobolaxm correctly. Basically 2 gears are selected together then I would think there are various way of changing to the second gear. There was talk of fitting 2 clutches in the gear box to select each engaged gear not sure if this was banned. Basically the Zeroshift means zero time that the gearbox is not driving the car. What has changed is the time it used to take for the selector ring to disengage from one gear and engage in the next gear.
|
|
|
29 Apr 2007, 20:11
|
#8
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,419
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ChironWSC
Karimbo
The above statement is not correct AU N EGL is only talking about a sequential gearbox
|
HELLLOOOO????? That is what I said, Sequentials.
|
|
__________________
"When the fear of death out weighs the thrill of speed, brake." LG
|
29 Apr 2007, 20:25
|
#9
|
 Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,455
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by AU N EGL
HELLLOOOO????? That is what I said, Sequentials.
|
Except that the question wasn't about sequentials as such, but the particular sort of sequential called "seemless shift" or "Zeroshift". This type have no gap at all in power delivery while the gear is being changed. As I understand it F1 has banned a zero time lag, but the technology is still used with a deliberate pause of the minimum allowable gap (or maybe that was the rule and its changed. Expert help anyone? Adam?) Anyway, I seem to recall that the main problem with using the truely seemless gearboxes is that the near instantaneous change in rotational speed of the output shafts, and hence wheel rims, gives the tyre walls some serious grief.
|
|
__________________
Gone as far as I can go.... so gonna stop.
|
30 Apr 2007, 07:46
|
#10
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,246
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ChironWSC
There was talk of fitting 2 clutches in the gear box to select each engaged gear not sure if this was banned.
|
I dont know if it was banned or not, but the function of having 2 clutches is basically the principle behind Volkswagens DSG gearboxes. The seamless gearboxes are different than the DSG boxes apparently, and the explainations already provided seem to back that up.
|
|
|
30 Apr 2007, 16:14
|
#11
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 559
|
To try and answer this as succinctly as possible:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by karimbo
1) Is a seamless shift gearbox the same as a CVT (continously variable transmission?
|
No. CVT's do not have discreet gear ratio's, F1 gearboxes all do.
Quote:
|
2) Do drivers have to shift gears themself.
|
Yep, they still have the paddles.
Quote:
|
3) How many gears do these transmission have?
|
I believe most, if not all, current F1 team use 7 forward gears in their transmissions.
Quote:
|
4) Do they have discreet ratios?
|
Yes.
As far as I know, the main difference between yesteryears "semi-automatic" and this years "seamless shift" gear boxes is about the use of the clutch, not the gears themselves.
In a normal semi, like with a normal gearbox, the clutch disengages whilst a new year is put into place, then re-engages the new year. This means there is a time (in an F1 car, a few milliseconds) where there is no power going directly to the wheels.
In a seamless shift box, there is no such time. I'm not entirely sure on the mechanism behind this, but I would imagine it could well be something like using two clutches (or more) so that for a period both gears could be engaged simultaneously, although only one would then be connected to the wheels. This would allow for there to be no momentary loss of power to the wheels when changing gear.
Hope that makes sense.
|
|
|
30 Apr 2007, 20:48
|
#12
|
 Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,455
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Sev
I'm not entirely sure on the mechanism behind this, but I would imagine it could well be something like using two clutches (or more) so that for a period both gears could be engaged simultaneously, although only one would then be connected to the wheels. This would allow for there to be no momentary loss of power to the wheels when changing gear.
|
No its entirely cleverer, and indeed simpler, than two clutches. It's all explained in the link from Jeremy in the second post
|
|
__________________
Gone as far as I can go.... so gonna stop.
|
7 May 2007, 11:52
|
#13
|
|
Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 28
|
I'm not sure you are right dtype38
All evidence i've heard so far is that the type used in f1 are based on the twin clutch/twin shaft idea
|
|
|
7 May 2007, 17:58
|
#14
|
 Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,455
|
Errr... ok, you got me there carlo. I "thought" that the seemless shifts used in F1 were a version of the Zeroshift, but I'm not prepared to put any money on it! Depends on your understanding of the terminology, but you could say that the dog engagement system of the Zeroshift is a twin clutch system.. sort of! Do you have any references for the system you refer to?
|
|
__________________
Gone as far as I can go.... so gonna stop.
|
7 May 2007, 18:19
|
#15
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2004
|
Richmond Hill, Ontario, Canada |
Posts: 1,104
|
F1 is definitely not using Zeroshift boxes. I believe they are using Dual Clutch technology, which gives an upshift time of approximately 40ms, downshifts a little longer. The Zeroshift box, uses overunning clutches and doesn't have a viable shift quality yet.
|
|
__________________
It's time to switch to Whiskey, we've been drinking Beer all night - Corb Lund
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|