Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Racing Talk > Racing Technology

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 25 May 2006, 01:20 (Ref:1618323)   #1
Maurini
Rookie
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2
Maurini should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Formula SAE Dampers

I helped to design the suspension for our Formula SAE car last year and had trouble making a damper selection. The final choice was Ohlin NT44 with remote reservoir which were clearly "overkill" for the application. These became a real packaging nightmare, and will likely be impossible to package this year because we are moving in the pull-rod direction.

Does anyone have any recommendations to compact and adjustable (minimum 2 way) dampers suitable for this application. My preference would be to use dampers with remote reservoirs, but I have reservations about using Mountain Bike dampers.

Your thoughts would be appreciated...
Maurini is offline  
Quote
Old 25 May 2006, 03:38 (Ref:1618361)   #2
Notso Swift
Veteran
 
Notso Swift's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
United Nations
37deg 46'52.36" S 144deg 59' 01.83"E
Posts: 1,914
Notso Swift should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
My preference would be to use dampers with remote reservoirs
Why?
Needle and seat design makes adjustment less linier.
Or do you need to remote mount the reserviors due to packaging/limited space in the mounting area, so you would rather take up more space over all, but are willing to do so because you move the weight around.
Notso Swift is offline  
Quote
Old 25 May 2006, 04:02 (Ref:1618368)   #3
Maurini
Rookie
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2
Maurini should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
The remote reservoir restriciton is due to packaging issues. We are trying to reduce the size of the rear box, and with the pull-rod suspension we need as much flexibility as possible.
Maurini is offline  
Quote
Old 26 May 2006, 13:21 (Ref:1619470)   #4
ss_collins
Veteran
 
ss_collins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Nigeria
Mooresville, NC
Posts: 6,704
ss_collins should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridss_collins should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridss_collins should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridss_collins should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
not a direct answer for you but this may help

http://www.racecar-engineering.com/c...notebook_3.htm

fair bit on damper location (with pics)
ss_collins is offline  
__________________
Chase the horizon
Quote
Old 26 May 2006, 22:31 (Ref:1619842)   #5
Mackmot
Veteran
 
Mackmot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
United Kingdom
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Posts: 2,188
Mackmot should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I strongly believe that the handling of the car is too important to be more bothered about the packaging and aero of an FSAE car.

Keep the quality dampers and set up your car well.
Mackmot is offline  
__________________
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
Quote
Old 2 Jun 2006, 16:19 (Ref:1625554)   #6
Seljak
Rookie
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Croatia
Posts: 14
Seljak should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
fsae dampers

finding the right damper for FSAE is a massive task. there arent alot of decent dampers avaliable for the application

we started with fox vanillas but they had problems with repetability, they were prone to overheating. The new fox vanillas have pro pedal which is crap for fsae and need to be rebuild as soon as you get them which is annoying. We ran pullrod with fox vanillas in 02 and 03 with great success. Winners of autocross in australia.

The last two years we have run penske 7800 dampers which were heaps better than the vanillas. The only problem with them is the are not externally adjustable, it takes a good hour to do rebuild them. Another problem we found was that each shock was completely different and it was practically impossible to find matching pairs. They are not that large and can be easily packaged for pullrod suspension, we ran it in that configuration in 2004 and pushrod in 2005.

This year i bought ohlins ST-44's, they are a good shock. our dyno testing has showed great repeatability and we found matching pairs. They are externally adjustable and have a big range of adjustment which saves us alot of precious tuning time. They are quite large and heavy but its well worth it. not good for pullrod but definetly good for pushrod suspension.

There are alot of dampers to use, have a look at what some other teams are using and talk to a decent suspension tuner for some advice. Remember that we run fairly low damper velocities compared to normal circuit racers so some dampers will not be suited to fsae application and finding small dampers for packaging is an even bigger nightmare.

cheers,
fil

Last edited by Seljak; 2 Jun 2006 at 16:23.
Seljak is offline  
Quote
Old 3 Jun 2006, 10:59 (Ref:1626019)   #7
shiny side up!
Veteran
 
shiny side up!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
United States
Ann Arbor
Posts: 1,332
shiny side up! should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quite a few teams acutually build their own shocks for FSAE. Usually those are not externally adjustable, so it can take a while to rebuild them, but once you get them sorted it makes it worth while from the packaging point of view without sacrificing handling. If you have access to a shock dyno, it makes the process of tuning / rebuilding that much quicker if you already know what in detail what an adjustment will do.
shiny side up! is offline  
__________________
Juliette Bravo! Juliette Bravo!!!!
Quote
Old 13 Jun 2006, 00:06 (Ref:1633058)   #8
Mech-Aero
Rookie
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
United States
CA
Posts: 1
Mech-Aero should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Our FSAE team is using ROMIC mtn bike shocks this year. They're a huge upgrade from the fox vanillas we used in the past.
Mech-Aero is offline  
Quote
Old 21 Jun 2006, 20:18 (Ref:1638613)   #9
Smokes
Rookie
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
England
Sheffield England
Posts: 6
Smokes should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Ask the Pace mtb company as they may be able to come up with a custom solution for a fsae shock
Smokes is offline  
Quote
Old 22 Jun 2006, 11:30 (Ref:1639017)   #10
Hitech
Rookie
 
Join Date: May 2002
England
UK, South Staffordshire
Posts: 67
Hitech should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
You eventually learn in motorsport that there is only one way to do things if you want to be successful, and that is to do it right.
Dampers are so fundamental in the package that you need to use the best you can find applicable to your application. Forget mountain bike shocks, they are much too light duty for car applications, even for FSAE/f.Student. Aviod the Spax/AVO end of the market if you can, good dampers are used by successful teams for a very good reason. Good luck with the car!
Hitech is offline  
Quote
Old 22 Jun 2006, 11:37 (Ref:1639025)   #11
ss_collins
Veteran
 
ss_collins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Nigeria
Mooresville, NC
Posts: 6,704
ss_collins should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridss_collins should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridss_collins should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridss_collins should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
http://www.racecar-engineering.com/c...notebook_4.htm

is the correct link (apologies)
ss_collins is offline  
__________________
Chase the horizon
Quote
Old 23 Jun 2006, 22:32 (Ref:1640075)   #12
R59
Veteran
 
R59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Heard and McDonald Islands
Bedfordshire
Posts: 3,523
R59 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridR59 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Talk to Koni.

They'll sort you out.
R59 is offline  
__________________
There is no substitute for cubic inches. Harry Belamonte - 403ci Vauxhall Belmont!!
A 700hp wayward shopping trolley on steroids!!
Quote
Old 25 Jun 2006, 00:53 (Ref:1640598)   #13
flavorPacket
Rookie
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
United States
Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 48
flavorPacket should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by shiny side up!
Quite a few teams acutually build their own shocks for FSAE. Usually those are not externally adjustable, so it can take a while to rebuild them, but once you get them sorted it makes it worth while from the packaging point of view without sacrificing handling. If you have access to a shock dyno, it makes the process of tuning / rebuilding that much quicker if you already know what in detail what an adjustment will do.
To my knowledge, we and Cornell are the only teams with completely custom dampers with independent compression and rebound adjustment, though Cornell's are not really externally adjustable (honestly we have some work to do here with the next generation, but our adjustment mechanisms do work, to varying degrees). ETS's dampers are very nice (hi/lo spd compression), but their guy Benoit openly admits that he used someone else's internals.

In response to the original poster's question, it seemed that RMIT had a fair bit of success with penske 1/4 midgets, if you're looking to buy. Unfortunately for us, our design judge was more interested in IC heights and roll camber than completely custom dampers (no bitterness here...), so from a design perspective I don't think you really gain as much as you need to put in to make quality dampers. They definitely performed on the track though, and excluding R&D time, were much cheaper than even the vanilla RCs we used previously.

Last edited by flavorPacket; 25 Jun 2006 at 01:00.
flavorPacket is offline  
__________________
"A racecar engineer can only sleep in one bed, but he can fill that bed with many women."

--Claude Rouelle
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Armstrong dampers dhart Racing Technology 6 24 Feb 2009 14:35
When to renew dampers? Tim Falce Racing Technology 15 9 May 2006 06:09
Dampers silente Racing Technology 24 18 Jan 2006 09:50
Proflex Dampers Boomerang Racing Technology 1 5 Sep 2005 08:37
Penske Dampers THR Racing Technology 9 25 Dec 2001 18:47


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:04.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.